Mafiascum.net

In post 1000, Infinity 324 wrote:Fire, hiplop, who's your other scumbuddy?

In post 1302, Infinity 324 wrote:How is that scummy?

I like to try to pressure replacements right when they replace in

In post 1304, MariaR wrote:

In post 1302, Infinity 324 wrote:How is that scummy?

I like to try to pressure replacements right when they replace in

you didn't do anything to me (not that I recall)

In post 1277, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok. I want to look for people pushing kts who weren't drawing attention to themselves and/or off the wagon. I don't think scum would make a big deal over trying to lynch someone only to have them flip PR.

-Manuel gave intent when intent was already given-- slightly towny
-Maria thought she was hammering early/generally drew attention to herself by voting and unvoting-- towny
-JarJar hammered and also voted and unvoted a bunch of times-- towny
-Rask made solid points against kts when he was already going down-- towny
-Slandaar was the first vote on the wagon and pushed it decently hard (though before the PR claim)-- towny
-hiplop voted kts because their predecessor did, and wasn't there for the claim and lynch-- meh
-fire tried to defend kts and called me scummy for bringing up points against them. Wasn't there for the lynch-- meh lean scum
-LQ voted after rask made the case, didn't do much else-- scummy (though I still have him as solidly town after rb interactions)
-DGB hopped on the wagon then disappeared-- scummy
-kraska unvoted and wanted to wait a day or two after the claim-- meh lean scum

(to be fair I would be on the scummy side of this list but still)

VOTE: DGB

In post 1295, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 1291, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 1140, Fire Assassin wrote:I don't see a reason to lynch KTS if what he says is true, Scum have to nk him or he has to out his "results" if he is scum.
Basically not a good lynch target today even if he is annoying.

This post is pretty shitty. Obviously "if what [KTS] says is true" there's be no reason to lynch him. If what he he says is true then he's town.

It feels like FA wrote this post knowing KTS was town.

The fact that he just disappeared and just let the lynch go through doesn't look good either.

Yeah that's a good point, honestly a lot of people did that

But basically this makes me more confident in my scumreads of fire, hiplop, and DGB

In post 1303, Fire Assassin wrote:That isn't pressure.

In post 1304, MariaR wrote:

In post 1302, Infinity 324 wrote:How is that scummy?

I like to try to pressure replacements right when they replace in

you didn't do anything to me (not that I recall)

In post 1305, Fire Assassin wrote:You say your scumreads are still me and hiplop nextday, so you think 2 people who are scum replaced out at same time.
Right....

In post 1308, Fire Assassin wrote:And hiplop even in your reads list is a "Meh" read.

How in the hell are you confident at all about hiplop being on a scumteam with me when you don't even have much to say about hiplop?

In post 1310, JarJarDrinks wrote:@Fire, do u townread DGB?

In post 1299, kraska77 wrote:@lq No I don't
And iso him He only has like a couple of posts in the thread it's not hard to figure out what posts I'm talking about

In post 1277, Infinity 324 wrote:-hiplop voted kts because their predecessor did, and wasn't there for the claim and lynch

-- meh

-fire tried to defend kts and called me scummy for bringing up points against them. Wasn't there for the lynch

-- meh lean scum

-LQ voted after rask made the case, didn't do much else-- scummy (though I still have him as solidly town after rb interactions)
-DGB hopped on the wagon then disappeared

-- scummy

In post 1312, Fire Assassin wrote:

In post 1310, JarJarDrinks wrote:@Fire, do u townread DGB?

No read on DGB, I think you are terrible town though.

In post 1314, Fire Assassin wrote:

In post 1277, Infinity 324 wrote:-hiplop voted kts because their predecessor did, and wasn't there for the claim and lynch

-- meh

-fire tried to defend kts and called me scummy for bringing up points against them. Wasn't there for the lynch

-- meh lean scum

-LQ voted after rask made the case, didn't do much else-- scummy (though I still have him as solidly town after rb interactions)
-DGB hopped on the wagon then disappeared

-- scummy

Okay lets see on this again.

Fire, LQ, DGB are all various scummy.

But here is the scum team guys:
Hiplop (who is meh), Fire, DGB.

Bullshit.

In post 1316, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 1312, Fire Assassin wrote:

In post 1310, JarJarDrinks wrote:@Fire, do u townread DGB?

No read on DGB, I think you are terrible town though.

Why terrible town and not scum?

In post 1313, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 1299, kraska77 wrote:@lq No I don't
And iso him He only has like a couple of posts in the thread it's not hard to figure out what posts I'm talking about

You have had 2 people ask you about the slip now. I think its appropriate that you say what exactly you think that is.

In post 1318, Fire Assassin wrote:

In post 1316, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 1312, Fire Assassin wrote:

In post 1310, JarJarDrinks wrote:@Fire, do u townread DGB?

No read on DGB, I think you are terrible town though.

Why terrible town and not scum?

Your approach to calling me scum sounds exactly like your town game and how you have pushed terrible reads.

In post 1317, MariaR wrote:I think he's talking about the actions around the bw on KTS and not overall play as in you can do scummy things on that bw but still be town I think you're chasing a deadend.

In post 1127, Fire Assassin wrote:

In post 1114, Killthestory wrote:Thank you.

I'm a night two JOAT.

And I might do something later, but I'm worn out.

JOAT aren't limited by nights. That isn't a role.

In post 1131, Fire Assassin wrote:

In post 1, Marquis wrote:All non-Vanilla roles hold the modifier "Night 2". Other modifiers may exist in the game (in conjunction with "Night 2") if applicable.

How the hell did this pass normal review?
This isn't normal.