Mafiascum.net

In post 1298, Elbirn wrote:

In post 1291, Saladman27 wrote:VOTE: Elbirn If Ali wants to policy lynch someone other than me, now that’s a problem...

In post 1292, Eve wrote:Ok back to Elbirn then VOTE: Elbirn

Okay how many mislynches do we have left cuz I'll burn this game to the ground just to get rid of these kids, I changed my mind

Scratch this, I'm just pissed at kids for being bad at this game. If we lynch them both and they're town we go to 4p mylo, we need to just lynch correctly

In post 1300, Elbirn wrote:

In post 1298, Elbirn wrote:

In post 1291, Saladman27 wrote:VOTE: Elbirn If Ali wants to policy lynch someone other than me, now that’s a problem...

In post 1292, Eve wrote:Ok back to Elbirn then VOTE: Elbirn

Okay how many mislynches do we have left cuz I'll burn this game to the ground just to get rid of these kids, I changed my mind

Scratch this, I'm just pissed at kids for being bad at this game. If we lynch them both and they're town we go to 4p mylo, we need to just lynch correctly

*scratches head*

Yet you're the one who says there can't possibly be two N3 PRs in this game.

Elbirn if Looker was my partner do you really think I'd put the first vote on him, keep it on, and make sure he gets lynched? You don't think I'd try to keep my partner alive Day 1?

HELLO.

EARTH TO ELBIRN.

In post 1302, Wake1 wrote:Elbirn if Looker was my partner do you really think I'd put the first vote on him, keep it on, and make sure he gets lynched?

100%

In post 1303, Elbirn wrote:

In post 1302, Wake1 wrote:Elbirn if Looker was my partner do you really think I'd put the first vote on him, keep it on, and make sure he gets lynched?

100%

Like, you know why?

Because then you get to say shit like the above

Despite not actually doing anything to ensure his lynch

And despite the fact that doing anything to derail his wagon would have been transparent as fuck, you can still claim you would have tried

Somebody talk some sense into Elbirn before he gets hammered.

ALSO, I would have you claim since you are at L-1.

In post 1302, Wake1 wrote:and make sure he gets lynched?

you say that but i feel like the credit goes to alimdia for the looker lynch

In post 1305, Wake1 wrote:Somebody talk some sense into Elbirn before he gets hammered.

ALSO, I would have you claim since you are at L-1.

I don't negotiate with terrorists

why in the everloving fuck are we voting elbirn

stop voting elbirn

VOTE: Saladman

this is a better wagon

honestly, i don't know that it's impossible to have two N3 PRs

i don't want to vote based on paranoid conspiracies that "person who hard pushed looker is scum in a 2scum game" until we've actually gotten through figuring out the people who _DIDN'T_ vote looker

yes?

How can Elbirn’s spot be conf!town just because Wimpy repped out? Wimpy repped out of all of his games, not just this one.

because of what happened in this game

And another. In the queues he /out of everything saying “mafiascum has deteriorated.”. Can’t say what happened in the other game cause it’s still ongoing.

If you want to figure out the people not voting looker why did you vote salad

In post 1313, Saladman27 wrote:And another. In the queues he /out of everything saying “mafiascum has deteriorated.”. Can’t say what happened in the other game cause it’s still ongoing.

So it seems you are saying wimpys replace out is irrelevant- what alignment are you reading elbirn as and why

In post 1311, Saladman27 wrote:How can Elbirn’s spot be conf!town just because Wimpy repped out? Wimpy repped out of all of his games, not just this one.

Salad why do you scumread me? Give reasons.

Pedit: Profi don't interrupt me to say what I'm saying

Well I'm not my question was tailored quite specifically to address my concerns that salad is making a meal over the replace out being NAI but also placing his vote on you without citing a real reason

I am purposely making the assumption salad believes the replace out is irrelevant so he either says no its scummy which would really be a bit of a backtrack imo or see if he comes up with a bonafide reason for scum reading you

In post 1314, profii wrote:If you want to figure out the people not voting looker why did you vote salad

wait what

oh wow i thought Zote hammered Looker

wait no, i re-read day1 and saladman only voted Looker right at the end when it was seemingly inevitable

In post 662, Saladman27 wrote:I’ll hammer, I guess. I mean who needs a claim when you can have a flip?
VOTE: Look

this was the only point that Salad voted Looker, the rest of the day prior his votes were either myself, Wake, or Saudade but he never really said much about why and totally avoided having an opinion about the Looker wagon

Yeah that's cool and all but is Saladman27 "smart" enough to no kill the first 3 nights just to fuck with us?

nokilling the first 3 nights is a really dumb strat

why is there even discussion based around the fact scum might've done that volunteerily? they didn't

i'd rather lynch saladman or elements actually

wake is annoying but he pushed Looker yesterday apparently and i believe his anger for now

elbirn is similarly grumpy and slightly more likely to be scum

salad defended elbirn/wimpy who could've been lynched instead of him so i guess i want to lynch Elements in that case

VOTE: Elements