Mafiascum.net

With 5 votes in play, it takes 3 to lynch.

Lynching

Quagsire

(2): GeorgeBailey, Looker

Alduskkel

(1): Quagsire

Not Voting

(2): Alduskkel, skitter30

Deadline:

(expired on 2020-04-16 10:00:00).

• skitter30 standing V/LA Fridays and Saturdays.
  
• skitter30 V/LA 9/4 - 11/4

[/area]

Tempting, but I'd rather wait for skitter.

Fair, i'm pretty sure we both know she'd be the NK.

I'll be here in a few hours, apologies for my absence

ok catching up now

In post 1259, GeorgeBailey wrote:Either Looker or Quag made that kill, since Furret said this EOD:

In post 1242, Captain the Furret wrote:skitter30
Alduskkel
GeorgeBailey
Quagsire
Looker
VOTE: Chemist1422

no i'm p sure furret was killed since they claimed bg

In post 1269, Quagsire wrote:forgot about this sequence of posts and the weird rvs push on menalque. i want to say this isn't svs theatre but other takes on this would be helpful.

i don't especially like gb's iso but i think that interaction of nom and mena's strongly points to town!mena

aldu is probably my strongest townread right now?
or more accurately, i guess, the person i'm least interested in lynching today?

i'm between looker/quag rn i think

In post 1272, Quagsire wrote:sighhh

i know skitter is vla but still she's the only one i can confidently say is town right now so i need to know where her head is at

doing this in the meantime

VOTE: alduskkel

yeah so this is the person i'm probably least likely to vote for today
i'm most likely going to be voting you once i'm caught up

In post 1276, Looker wrote:Why is Skitter town?

hi how are you reading me?

In post 1279, GeorgeBailey wrote:although quag leaving Ald at L-1 "in the meantime" is really sketchy.

i didn't even realize that was l-1; tbf i think that today two votes is l-1 so i think i'd give that a little more leeway than the luca l-1

also today is probably massclaim day i think

In post 1288, Looker wrote:VOTE: Alduskkel

why exactly are you voting aldu?

i want looker to articulate his reads on everyone
but i'm probably going to be voting quag i think

i think i'm at

{aldu}
{gb}
{looker}
{quag}

hi sorry life's been busy and i keep forgetting the prod timers are 36 instead of 48

catching up soonish

In post 1276, Looker wrote:

• Why is skitter town?
  
• Why would skitter's thoughts override your own?
  
• If you don't think Alduskkel is scum, why would you vote him?

I'm not understanding the pro-townness of this "Follow the Skitter" approach

skitter is town because of noms associations, unless she was bussing, but that'd have to be a hell of a bus.

i do think alduskkel is scum, that's why i'm voting him.

In post 1280, Alduskkel wrote:which is the second time that quag has casually put someone at L-1

the first time being luca

i like how this is the thing people are picking apart out of my iso instead of my actual arguments

In post 1288, Looker wrote:I got it from the "sighhh" and usage of "meantime". It lacks conviction and expresses resignation in a way that relinquishes accountability.

---

VOTE: Alduskkel

the 'sighh' was because no one was posting and this game is boring and no one wants to lynch aldus despite the bad associations with noms

In post 1306, skitter30 wrote:aldu is probably my strongest townread right now?
or more accurately, i guess, the person i'm least interested in lynching today?

ok why

what has aldus done to warrant such a strong townread

i'm not townreading him strongly so much that i think that out of you lot he's least likely to be scum, which isn't quite the same thing

he's good tonewise and just seems very ... earnest? pure? idk the right word exactly
like i read his iso and i have trouble seeing scum saying a lot of the things he has

what exactly are his bad associative with nom?

In post 42, nomnomnom wrote:heartwarming response, aw...
VOTE: Alduskkel

I agree this is kind of weird, but Ald has a much better wagon history right now

I see that nothing has changed.

In post 1296, GeorgeBailey wrote:Can you tell me briefly why you scumread Ald over Quag?

Why does it have to be brief? We clearly have all the time in the world. Alduskkel voteparked on Heaven while nom's wagon rode the wave, and I feel he was expecting to capitalize on my tunneling of Quagsire. The second part could be said of any of you, though. I also feel nom could've been distancing because she voted him the most.

In post 1297, Alduskkel wrote:unless skitter wants to come in here and drop the take of the century.

Even if she did, though...I mean...come on....

In post 1302, GeorgeBailey wrote:Fair, i'm pretty sure we both know she'd be the NK.

Over me? But I'm the most townie.

In post 1317, Quagsire wrote:the 'sighh' was because no one was posting and this game is boring and no one wants to lynch aldus despite the bad associations with noms

Hey, that's not my fault, man; I'm not the one trying to inspect skitter's colon with my skull.

• @skitter: I don't get it. Kill one of us today and the other one tomorrow; what's the hold up?
  • If you're as good as they say you are, then you've already won. And that's whether you were bussing nom or not.
    
  • As far as articulation, I did. I think. But if I didn't I don't care. Barring GB scum, this game is over.

Looker's vote is still really weird here. Happened right after I put Nom up to L-1.

In post 864, Looker wrote:

In post 843, nomnomnom wrote:the fact that the majority of players have said that they think quag/me are partners on d1 without any kind of flip is extremely concerning

Having scumreads is concerning, not having scumreads is concerning - I just keep getting called concerning. So many opinions about how other people should be playing this game.

---

• If Aldus is talking to others to reconcile his scumread of me, why isn't Quag calling him out for "playing around his scumread"?

VOTE: nomnomnom

In post 1074, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 953, Captain the Furret wrote:@George and Aldusk, can you two pick a wagon to support?
its crunch time.

Will do.

Sorry nom, Chemist joining the Ald wagon really doesn't help.

VOTE: nomnomnom

In post 1077, Looker wrote:VOTE: Alduskkel

Did you see Chemist's vote there as well?

It's more of the timing Looker.