Mafiascum.net

In post 1295, Quick wrote:

In post 1293, Vecna wrote:

In post 1218, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1217, Quick wrote:

In post 1215, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1204, Auro wrote:

In post 1199, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Bah. What will we get from it though? That’s the problem. If we’re gonna lynch a lurky person t should be one that has had other people discussing it. Otherwise we really get nothing.

Sure. Hence we wagon them to generate discussion, probably cycle through a few, and then proceed to lynch.

Well yeah but you don’t generally say that’s what you’re doing or it defeats the purpose if they know they aren’t actually getting lynched. This kinda stuff happens naturally anyway for the most part, especially on day one.

That's why we lynch worthless slots.

THUS. HOCTAC.

Also brushed off suspicion on another one of my scumreads Hoctac as "just meme'ing".

Auro, noooo

I don't see Auro getting lynched at this point in the game...

Maybe thatll change when I tell you the last 2 games with auro:

the 1st he was scum. He was doing this fluffy nice attitude with getting along with people. Nearly everyone townread him.
the 2nd he was actually town. He was very inquisitive, outspoken, prodding. Nearly the entire playerlist scumread him hard because of his tone or whatever (he was in a hydra though, but I was actually forming my townread based solely on the Auro stuff). I had to mason with the slot and help redeem it. We solved that shit together very nicely

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82629

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82397

spot the differences and tell me which one is more similair to this game. Note that auro is in the p-horses hydra and was responsible for like 80-90% of the communication done.

In post 1301, Vecna wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82629

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82397

spot the differences and tell me which one is more similair to this game. Note that auro is in the p-horses hydra and was responsible for like 80-90% of the communication done.

I forgot TH was part of that hydra. That is a big difference.

VOTE: auro

In post 1302, farside22 wrote:

In post 1301, Vecna wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82629

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82397

spot the differences and tell me which one is more similair to this game. Note that auro is in the p-horses hydra and was responsible for like 80-90% of the communication done.

I forgot TH was part of that hydra. That is a big difference.

VOTE: auro

How thoroughly did you actually check out that game there?

farside has a lot of empty votes? or is it just me?

In post 1303, Quick wrote:

In post 1302, farside22 wrote:

In post 1301, Vecna wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82629

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82397

spot the differences and tell me which one is more similair to this game. Note that auro is in the p-horses hydra and was responsible for like 80-90% of the communication done.

I forgot TH was part of that hydra. That is a big difference.

VOTE: auro

How thoroughly did you actually check out that game there?

She was in it

In post 1298, Vecna wrote:Town Auro would bank on own interpretations and not ask someone else to do the work to convince him.

And my interpretations are that ETL is town, and the allegations are fake and made up.

Thus, my asking to explain.

I might be able to vote for Auro, but only if they show up soon.

P-Edit: Priceless.

[/v]Auro[/v]

These can go at this point:
Jake
5G
Hactoc
Creature
Ari

Okay, that's not a bad list rn.

In post 1293, Vecna wrote:Also brushed off suspicion on another one of my scumreads Hoctac as "just meme'ing".

Oooh kay dude Hectic's big post about only being able to form a read on D4 and that's with a cop guilty, and suddenly solving on D7 is very obviously a meme.

And considering I was wagoning Hectic... Someone's not paying attention

I stated at the end of Doubles I wouldn't be sticking to that playstyle, no? Were you expecting me to tryhard this game as well? Especially considering this is a cult game?

If you're pushing a scumread on me so I don't get infected, then carry on

In post 1291, Vecna wrote:1: Solve the game Day 1 so we dont end up getting stuck in the "OMG LOOK HOW DIFF THIS SLOT IS NOW BEHAVING", which will result in way too many mislynches

2: Lynch the initial 3 scum members, hopefully strongly reducing their ability to spread the shit

3: Use whatever mechanical gimmick is available to make 50% of us immune

So? My point was that strong townreads shouldn't be stated, and how does that detract from this strat exactly?

@Auro,

Are you caught up?

But I have no credibility, honestly. Don't sheep me, I am only Mafia Scum.

Just asking questions here. It would be nice for answers.

Loosely, I didn't read some stuff closely, what's up

@Vecna: Also, as scum the whole "be nice and rational" strategy doesn't really work here because being widely townread makes it harder to justify not being infected. Mimicking my Doubles play - where I'm pushed hardly instead of hardly pushed, with a few slots like yours that defend me - that is the ideal spot to maintain as scum.

Do you doubt my scum capabilities to faking tryhardness?

In post 679, Quick wrote:

In post 676, Auro wrote:Strong townreads are: {Mastina, ETL, Miss Lynch, Nero Cain}
Nero is sheep read of Mastina.

I like your ISO quite a bit.

In post 682, Quick wrote:

In post 680, Auro wrote::3 anyone else you think I should be strongly townreading?

Well I'm not really sure why you were putting pressure on me when I am obvtown, but beyond that I don't really have any problems with your reads.

In post 835, Quick wrote:

In post 682, Quick wrote:

In post 680, Auro wrote::3 anyone else you think I should be strongly townreading?

Well I'm not really sure why you were putting pressure on me when I am obvtown, but beyond that I don't really have any problems with your reads.

I am just asking here but is this spicy or not that they never answered this?

In post 853, Quick wrote:

In post 835, Quick wrote:

In post 682, Quick wrote:

In post 680, Auro wrote::3 anyone else you think I should be strongly townreading?

Well I'm not really sure why you were putting pressure on me when I am obvtown, but beyond that I don't really have any problems with your reads.

I am just asking here but is this spicy or not that they never answered this?

In post 868, Quick wrote:

In post 795, Auro wrote:I wonder what would happen if I threaten to tank my play if I'm infected.

Because winning doesn't matter

In post 1220, Quick wrote:

In post 1218, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1217, Quick wrote:

In post 1215, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1204, Auro wrote:

In post 1199, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Bah. What will we get from it though? That’s the problem. If we’re gonna lynch a lurky person t should be one that has had other people discussing it. Otherwise we really get nothing.

Sure. Hence we wagon them to generate discussion, probably cycle through a few, and then proceed to lynch.

Well yeah but you don’t generally say that’s what you’re doing or it defeats the purpose if they know they aren’t actually getting lynched. This kinda stuff happens naturally anyway for the most part, especially on day one.

That's why we lynch worthless slots.

THUS. HOCTAC.

5G is worse. And Wolfie doesn't even have a gimmick.

In post 1224, Quick wrote:

In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1200, Auro wrote:I like annoying Nero.

I'm not very annoyed. try harder.

You really are not trying very hard Nero. Are you Scum? Honest answers only.

P-Edit. Yeah, because Saud actually adds value to the game and all these other players don't.

In post 1258, Quick wrote:

In post 1256, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1244, Quick wrote:Did Creature seriously clear himself for having a casual conversation about writing novels?

maybe?

His meta isn't as black and white as it used to be but generally posting creature=town creature. And him being inactive early on made me think he was scum. The q is does he/his scum buddy see a mini wagon on him and yells @ him to come post?

I already

shaded

that. No one picked up on it except you.

In post 1260, Quick wrote:

In post 853, Quick wrote:

In post 835, Quick wrote:

In post 682, Quick wrote:

In post 680, Auro wrote::3 anyone else you think I should be strongly townreading?

Well I'm not really sure why you were putting pressure on me when I am obvtown, but beyond that I don't really have any problems with your reads.

I am just asking here but is this spicy or not that they never answered this?

Okay, nvm, maybe it is just normal.

In post 1295, Quick wrote:

In post 1293, Vecna wrote:

In post 1218, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1217, Quick wrote:

In post 1215, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1204, Auro wrote:

In post 1199, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Bah. What will we get from it though? That’s the problem. If we’re gonna lynch a lurky person t should be one that has had other people discussing it. Otherwise we really get nothing.

Sure. Hence we wagon them to generate discussion, probably cycle through a few, and then proceed to lynch.

Well yeah but you don’t generally say that’s what you’re doing or it defeats the purpose if they know they aren’t actually getting lynched. This kinda stuff happens naturally anyway for the most part, especially on day one.

That's why we lynch worthless slots.

THUS. HOCTAC.

Also brushed off suspicion on another one of my scumreads Hoctac as "just meme'ing".

Auro, noooo

I don't see Auro getting lynched at this point in the game...

In post 1308, Quick wrote:VOTE: Auro

Okay, GLHF

In post 173, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 161, Tchill13 wrote:ETL do you think ML as scum would be willing to grab the spot light and tunnel you on a semi absurd reason? do you consider that good scum play this early?

No. She's probably town.

In post 164, Auro wrote:

In post 111, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:auro - seems scummy b/c contentless posts. FIVE contentless posts.

Make it 8 now!

@Miss Lynch: I watched Community years ago, it's one of my FAVORITE shows! Sadly it's not on Netflix in India right now for another rewatch.

VOTE: Auro

In post 214, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 209, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 198, Tchill13 wrote:that didnt last long.

I find it odd you immediately vote the guy I was shading then back off after a pretty quick resolution when you've already showed you can play with some real conviction.

pretty easy to come out from your suspicion it seems ETL.

I was interested in Auro because he had said absolutely nothing of an import. I wanted to get more from him. I did.

I don't want to play with conviction anymore. It doesn't do any good.

I just found it odd that i vote you, i shade someone, you vote said shade then you move on relatively quick.

Its a little weird that nobody really pushed you after the fiasco but it seems like your handling of auro will suffice for now.

UNVOTE:

Also, Vecna, did you assume I would follow the tryhard playstyle even as a PR?

Given I have a constraint of only appearing for a while sporadically in games (and you can see this in my sitewide activity), how do you think my play would map?

(On a side note, you could say I'm masterminding this defense expecting people to call me scummy for being defensive, thus fulfilling my scum goal. Heh)

In post 1285, Quick wrote:

In post 1284, Saudade wrote:do you scumread me or what more content from me tchill13

Do you have any content to offer? How about on D2?

I wasn't talking to you, nor is the point of my question to "defend" the amount of content I've produced.
in short, keep quiet and let the brilliant player do his work

Ugh Vecna is never online when I'm online

In post 1317, Auro wrote:(and you can see this in my sitewide activity)

Are you saying we should know if you are a PR or not at this point? Sorry I haven't actually played since almost 2 years ago so I am a bit rusty.

In post 1318, Saudade wrote:

In post 1285, Quick wrote:

In post 1284, Saudade wrote:do you scumread me or what more content from me tchill13

Do you have any content to offer? How about on D2?

I wasn't talking to you, nor is the point of my question to "defend" the amount of content I've produced.
in short, keep quiet and let the brilliant player do his work

Or we can lynch this instead? I can add you to "THE LIST..." if you want.

come and vote me peasant

This is a large game which is hard to get into for many players, if you're goiing to play roulette and vote anyone who isn't "contributing" in a manner that you see fit you're a bad player

I'm not implying anything. I'm just surprised that Vecna has bucketed my style in such a straightforward way.

@Saudade: A50 slot, what do you think?