Posted: Sat May 23, 2020 11:08 am
Is that a good enough reason to vote?In post 1277, osuka wrote:i dont think there is a good answer to this questionIn post 1264, Formerfish wrote:Freddie, why shouldn't you die today?
VOTE: freddie
Is that a good enough reason to vote?In post 1277, osuka wrote:i dont think there is a good answer to this questionIn post 1264, Formerfish wrote:Freddie, why shouldn't you die today?
VOTE: freddie
I think heIn post 1289, Formerfish wrote:Do you think he defends his scum buddy so blatantly? If he's town should we assume why he's so adamant about Freddie being town? If Vota is town, and Freddie is town, and brass was town, who's scum?In post 1287, osuka wrote:interested in what you have in mind but don't say it because I wanna hear it from freddie first, assuming you're rightIn post 1285, Formerfish wrote:There is, I just don't think he's going to figure out what it is.In post 1277, osuka wrote:i dont think there is a good answer to this questionIn post 1264, Formerfish wrote:Freddie, why shouldn't you die today?
VOTE: freddie
let's talk about votato
i have plenty of good enough reasons to vote your slotIn post 1300, Freddiethelady wrote:Is that a good enough reason to vote?In post 1277, osuka wrote:i dont think there is a good answer to this questionIn post 1264, Formerfish wrote:Freddie, why shouldn't you die today?
VOTE: freddie
uh sorry i seem to have missed this postIn post 1299, Freddiethelady wrote:you’ve said yourself that I’m a bad player many times, so Going off that, how likely is it that I’m strategic enough to be scum? Is that a chance you’re willing to take when Deciding whether you should risk voting another lynch? Are you taking that into consideration, or are you happy with Just anyone hanging....In post 1264, Formerfish wrote:Freddie, why shouldn't you die today?
In post 1304, osuka wrote:uh sorry i seem to have missed this postIn post 1299, Freddiethelady wrote:you’ve said yourself that I’m a bad player many times, so Going off that, how likely is it that I’m strategic enough to be scum? Is that a chance you’re willing to take when Deciding whether you should risk voting another lynch? Are you taking that into consideration, or are you happy with Just anyone hanging....In post 1264, Formerfish wrote:Freddie, why shouldn't you die today?
this is probably the worst post in the thread so far. Everyone in this thread is now slightly more brain damaged than they were before having read this pile of dogshit, dumpster fire of a post
It's so weird that you were so convinced for Brass to be scum based on meta, yet in this same post back peddle on the lynch by saying your vote was for pressure.In post 1303, Nauci wrote:@Tuxedo: I don't like the way you're trying to shade my D1 read on Brass/waves. I was extremely transparent on just how unlike Brass's meta. Or the way you shut down discussion of Freddie when A: there hadn't even been enough pages to go anywhere, B: Freddie had not showed up to respond yet, and C: it was clearly the biggest point of discussion from yesterday and still needs sorting today. What was your motivation there?
I'm pretty sure I explained myself clearly yesterday. I had a strong meta-based scum read on Brass, and wavesarc had barely contributed to the thread. You were my strongest scumread largely based on your predecesor's posts, but since you contributed a ton of content under pressure, I wanted to pressure my other scum read to also contribute. It was unfortunately hammered before that happened. Nice try with the shade but this is how scum hunting works.In post 1307, Tuxedo Mask wrote:It's so weird that you were so convinced for Brass to be scum based on meta, yet in this same post back peddle on the lynch by saying your vote was for pressure.
tux may have brought it up a few times since his attempt to change the subject was largely ignored. just a thought.In post 1310, Nauci wrote:I'm pretty sure I explained myself clearly yesterday. I had a strong meta-based scum read on Brass, and wavesarc had barely contributed to the thread. You were my strongest scumread largely based on your predecesor's posts, but since you contributed a ton of content under pressure, I wanted to pressure my other scum read to also contribute. It was unfortunately hammered before that happened. Nice try with the shade but this is how scum hunting works.In post 1307, Tuxedo Mask wrote:It's so weird that you were so convinced for Brass to be scum based on meta, yet in this same post back peddle on the lynch by saying your vote was for pressure.
If you want people to stop talking about Freddie and start talking about meaningful stuff, why don't you actively start that up instead of trying to shut the other conversations down? I mean you're literally posting about how we need to talk about how we feel about all the other players but you've not done so yourself, and all you did day 1 was tunnel that slot.
I think that the Freddie discussion had potential to head somewhere, especially after Freddie actually came to respond to them, and that how different players discussed that slot was helping me sort them.
I'd just like to hear you talk about NOT Freddie, you're my strongest town read. So I think your reads of the players could help. Obviously you don't have to, but I think it would be good for the game state.In post 1316, Formerfish wrote:And what exactly is expected of me right now, Tux?
Waves had a decent shot of being scum, and wasn't. Freddie was my next choice and his play in twilight only served to further that read and his play today is very much scum play.
So I'm going to push the read I have and see him lynched. What are you doing?
I think this is bad faith, FF said multiple times that he was dropping his normal schtick and playing day 2 style in day 1.In post 1291, votato wrote:and fish the bar is higher for you. you said your gambit would give us a solve by today. where is the solve? or were you just scrambling because we caught you being scummy?
Line by line:In post 1314, Freddiethelady wrote: tux may have brought it up a few times since his attempt to change the subject was largely ignored. just a thought.
I don't really know how to contribute at this point - the discussion has only been revolving around how shitty my posts are, which is just noise. lilith isn't around nor is gibus. i think tux and nauci are doing a nice job of looking for other things to discuss, but aren't being engaged. fish and osuka aren't doing much except critique my posts. votato is quiet for now but not like lilith or gibus who have been virtually silent for a long time now.
so nauci, what happened? you had me convinced his slot was scum. i was really surprised by the result; bass' game/behavior may have been an anomaly.
osuka, you're a loud and obnoxious dick. you're unlike fish who (comes across as abrasive also) at least has the decency of explaining why he abhors my reads/personality/contributions. i will improve my game...will you?
question: is it common to suspect someone is lying who confirms themselves as town like i did? i guess i answered my own question by observing that im still under scrutiny even though i confirmed my role.
In post 1314, Freddiethelady wrote:who confirms themselves as town like i did?
This is a question for BrassIn post 1314, Freddiethelady wrote:so nauci, what happened? you had me convinced his slot was scum. i was really surprised by the result; bass' game/behavior may have been an anomaly.
Actually I don't think it's the same. From you, it felt more like a legitimate question/comment. From Freddie, it felt really weird because A: they literally just read my response to you on the same topic because that's the post they quoted, and B: Freddie went out of their way to claim that they were voting Brass solely because they were sheeping me yesterday, as if it absolved them from the responsibility of forming a read or from the responsibility of a mislynch. I think I need to reread the entire Freddie ISO on Monday because this feels like classic distancing from pushing a mislynch?In post 1318, Tuxedo Mask wrote:3: @Nauci, is this how I came off when I criticized your meta read? If so I'm sorry.