Mafiascum.net

In post 1253, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 1251, Looker wrote:

In post 1241, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Aye, my head thinks you might be town because truth was voting for you

What are you doing? Why would you vote for me when neither osuka or superbowl were on Truth's lynch? Are you sleepy, tired, bored...?

---

• Does anyone know what process Titus uses to accomplish VCA? We're just going to go with it?

I don't know what you people are doing, but I will applaud in twilight if I'm lynched. Killing the worst over Walter was an excellent move.

Truly,
I already knew I was n3 kill.
Gotta admit my head is jumbled rn

Nobody wants your disclaimers, Dunce; just hammer osuka.

In post 1268, osuka wrote:

In post 1266, superbowl9 wrote:Ik some people like it but why are we putting so much faith in titus VCA? Like I can get chkflip wanting it because they have meta or whatever, but why are seemingly most treating this as gospel? Not to mention you're implying a townread on the slot, which what has overkill/titus done to deserve?

superbowl/looker scumteam

game is solved, you can all vote now

This is the first that I'm hearing of you suspecting superbowl. Why didn't you push him when I first called him scum? What changed? Do you think he's been bussing me for the past two days?

In post 1277, osuka wrote:

In post 1244, Gypyx wrote:how would you rate the odds of scum!looker?

I missed this, but 70-30

If looked flips green, Titus is confscum

If we're doing percentages, then 42% osuka | 28% superbowl | 21% Dunnstral, Chkflip or Nepenthes | 7% Titus | 2% Gypyx.

In post 1278, osuka wrote:@looker reminder number 82 that you have yet to reply to my question

83

• So, basically, Titus's VCA is easily manipulable and subjective.
  
• I think you guys should penalize dumb town just as much as scum. If they're on my wagon, lynch them.
  
• Titus is suspicious of superbowl, but is going with the crowd so as not to stand out or look bad
  
• Where did I AtE?

How is this not a repeat of yesterday? Can y'all not see that scum are desperately trying to kill me? Two OMGUSes, a WIFOMy "VCA" (which is compromised by subjective and inconsistent interpretations of bussing), and a Dunce. What are you guys doing?

In post 1299, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1287, Nepenthes wrote:

In post 1275, superbowl9 wrote:Yes
Especially because yall will eat up her VCA in which she points out she bussed her partner who is clearly going to be an elim at some point

What do you scumread abt titus

To give u a quick summary, overkill was doing nothing with unexplored and poor lines of thought, then titus replaced in and has also had poor votes. I don't feel genuine attempts to read the game from her just excuses to elim whoever she likes (VCA is a perfect tool for this)

Poor votes? Deciding to join conftown on scum was a poor vote? Also for someone claiming we shouldn't use vote history, you sure are arguing my vote history was bad.

VCA is actually a horrible tool for eliminating whoever I want. If someone is actually doing VCA, there are conclusions that can't be walked away from.

You want to argue VCA is subjective and useless. Do your own. VCA has been my theory for years. I openly invite challenges to it. I murderfuck anyone who says VCA isn't scumhunting.

I may scumhunt differently, but I still scumhunt. Try to push this Titus is only VCAing when my votes are good. Try it. I live and die by my VCA.

In post 1300, Looker wrote:So, basically, Titus's VCA is easily manipulable and subjective.

My VCA is not why you're wagoned. My VCA doesn't clear you and you and Osaka are the options. Osaka's early voting clears him. Flipping you gets more information to nail down my VCA.

Cleared him because he voted Truth in RVS?

Because he stayed off bugspray who was obviously going to die with no assistance needed?

Because he tried to lynch me instead of Truth?

Because he's trying to lynch me again?

I think I'm justified in calling your trying to experiment with my lynch weak. You don't seem nearly confident enough to require only my lynch to hammer things down. Any lynch at this point should help you narrow things down.

It's hardly RVS to scum given the bugspray forced voting as well. Voting scum and not voting town are pretty strong indicators of being town.

As for lynching you instead of Truth, that's NAI without your alignment. If you're scum, it's null. If you're town, he's likely dumb town because of how vocal he was.

In post 1307, Looker wrote:I think I'm justified in calling your trying to experiment with my lynch weak. You don't seem nearly confident enough to require only my lynch to hammer things down. Any lynch at this point should help you narrow things down.

Only your lynch solidifies the options scum had Day 2. That would be either a double bus or a mislynch and a bus.

I don't know your alignment. Your lynch is a higher net positive to me than Osaka. Osaka's hunting. You are whining. Talk to me about who scum are.

With all due respect, Ms. Murderfucker, I don't understand your first sentence.

Also, everything is NAI when you don't know alignments.

p-edit: Interesting and inaccurate interpretation - whining vs hunting.

That exchange was like watching a classmate drink bleach. Thank you for revealing to me what I'm dealing with here.

In post 1310, Looker wrote:With all due respect, Ms. Murderfucker, I don't understand your first sentence.

Also, everything is NAI when you don't know alignments.

p-edit: Interesting and inaccurate interpretation - whining vs hunting.

This post is why you don't understand VCA.

To do a legitimate VCA, you have to either a) know what scum wanted or b) make an educated guess at what scum wanted. For me, the only way I can do that is if I know your alignment.

I can say early voters on Truth on Day 1 are likely town. That's because the action is not one scum regularly take.

You can bitch about me respecting my process and not overselling or underselling, or you can tell us who scum are.

I'm not a bitch². I think that post is of me not understanding your VCA, not I don't understand it. And I've already said osuka/superbowl.

Also, the assumption is that when you say "regularly", you have the games to back it up, so that's my assumption as of now.

Anyways...it's late and I have better things to do, so good luck.

Lol this whole page is just caught scum having a goddamn meltdown

My drunk ass couldn’t even begin to fathom how big a meltdown this is, it might just be the worst I’ve ever seen. It’s kinda funny actually

In post 1300, Looker wrote:

In post 1253, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 1251, Looker wrote:

In post 1241, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Aye, my head thinks you might be town because truth was voting for you

What are you doing? Why would you vote for me when neither osuka or superbowl were on Truth's lynch? Are you sleepy, tired, bored...?

---

• Does anyone know what process Titus uses to accomplish VCA? We're just going to go with it?

I don't know what you people are doing, but I will applaud in twilight if I'm lynched. Killing the worst over Walter was an excellent move.

Truly,
I already knew I was n3 kill.
Gotta admit my head is jumbled rn

Nobody wants your disclaimers, Dunce; just hammer osuka.

In post 1268, osuka wrote:

In post 1266, superbowl9 wrote:Ik some people like it but why are we putting so much faith in titus VCA? Like I can get chkflip wanting it because they have meta or whatever, but why are seemingly most treating this as gospel? Not to mention you're implying a townread on the slot, which what has overkill/titus done to deserve?

superbowl/looker scumteam

game is solved, you can all vote now

This is the first that I'm hearing of you suspecting superbowl. Why didn't you push him when I first called him scum? What changed? Do you think he's been bussing me for the past two days?

In post 1277, osuka wrote:

In post 1244, Gypyx wrote:how would you rate the odds of scum!looker?

I missed this, but 70-30

If looked flips green, Titus is confscum

If we're doing percentages, then 42% osuka | 28% superbowl | 21% Dunnstral, Chkflip or Nepenthes | 7% Titus | 2% Gypyx.

In post 1278, osuka wrote:@looker reminder number 82 that you have yet to reply to my question

83

---

• So, basically, Titus's VCA is easily manipulable and subjective.
  
• I think you guys should penalize dumb town just as much as scum. If they're on my wagon, lynch them.
  
• Titus is suspicious of superbowl, but is going with the crowd so as not to stand out or look bad
  
• Where did I AtE?

How is this not a repeat of yesterday? Can y'all not see that scum are desperately trying to kill me? Two OMGUSes, a WIFOMy "VCA" (which is compromised by subjective and inconsistent interpretations of bussing), and a Dunce. What are you guys doing?

To answer your questions, which I almost feel like is unfair to myself since you have yet to answer mine:

1251 is ate
Your quoted post is ate
I’m suspicious of super bowl but I’m more suspicious of you
“If they’re on my wagon, lynch them” is a sorry excuse for an ate
Titus vca is manipulable, yes, but that’s not what my case on you is. In fact, my case on you predates that by a lot and you haven’t answered my question

Answer my question, looker

This whole page is a big scum ate meltdown and if this is not, in itself, an excellent case for a looker exec, I truly don’t know what is

I am not sure how to read these looker posts.

In post 1310, Looker wrote:With all due respect, Ms. Murderfucker, I don't understand your first sentence.

Don't fucking be disrespectful.

Kinda weird of Titus and Looker get online at the same and also vanish at the same time for litterally the first time in the game at this time

In post 1320, chkflip wrote:

In post 1310, Looker wrote:With all due respect, Ms. Murderfucker, I don't understand your first sentence.

Don't fucking be disrespectful.

What is up with you trying to police me. She says she murderfucks. Therefore, murderfucker.

Also, note the consistent "BWAHAHAHA MELTDOWN!!!! LOLOLOLOL!" angle from osuka.

Are you not reading what people write, chkflip?