Mafiascum.net

In post 1296, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1289, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1285, Battle Mage wrote:Flea is doing a lot of that LAMISTy stuff but it's superficial - long ISO cases which don't strike a balanced objective line, are a scum move I've used many times in my youth.

This is where you and I differ, you read my ISO as a case and as an attack, not me running over my thoughts on you and adjusting or confirming my read.

It's my thoughts, not a case. If people agree with it, they agree with it. If people want to supply me with non-meta information or differing ways of reading a post, then I'll sit, consider and adjust.

I'm a brain spewer I just put out whatevers in my head as I'm reading something.

I mean I don't think it's so much that "we differ", as you're wrong. There was no obvious attempt to "adjust" your read - you singled out a bunch of posts which were completely meaningless and objectively NAI, and tried to contrive to make them seem scummy to bolster your position. It was a case of "I've said BM is scum, now I have to prove it" rather than "I wonder if BM is town or scum".

I'm open to the idea that you're just town who got carried away, but I'll wait and see if you take a more objective line to appraising people going forward.

In post 1302, Battle Mage wrote:i'm on board

VOTE: blitzo

In post 1233, Titus wrote:

In post 1221, Taly wrote:VOTE: DippingGoofball

I want to start here. Undeveloped thoughts from this slot.

This is OMGUS.

In post 1234, Titus wrote:

In post 1207, Taly wrote:I want Titus to explain her meta takes and evaluate their strength openly. I think her frustration to DGB is sincere and I want to lean in on the way she approaches this plist read wise.

What in particular?

In post 1280, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1222, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1220, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 1219, Taly wrote:If you want to group, requote this list in a chain

Taly, come to Electrical tonight.

Titus reads all over the place here - unusual for her.

Ignoring the baiting from Flea - I have been pulling out some great reads so far imho.

In post 1281, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1269, SirCakez wrote:ok
Does anyone else have the feeling with Taly's posts that she is writing a lot of words but none of them actually mean that much?

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

In post 1284, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 1281, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1269, SirCakez wrote:ok
Does anyone else have the feeling with Taly's posts that she is writing a lot of words but none of them actually mean that much?

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

I highly doubt DGB read any of taly's posts b4 responding here.

In post 1303, Flea The Magician wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 1296, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1289, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1285, Battle Mage wrote:Flea is doing a lot of that LAMISTy stuff but it's superficial - long ISO cases which don't strike a balanced objective line, are a scum move I've used many times in my youth.

This is where you and I differ, you read my ISO as a case and as an attack, not me running over my thoughts on you and adjusting or confirming my read.

It's my thoughts, not a case. If people agree with it, they agree with it. If people want to supply me with non-meta information or differing ways of reading a post, then I'll sit, consider and adjust.

I'm a brain spewer I just put out whatevers in my head as I'm reading something.

I mean I don't think it's so much that "we differ", as you're wrong. There was no obvious attempt to "adjust" your read - you singled out a bunch of posts which were completely meaningless and objectively NAI, and tried to contrive to make them seem scummy to bolster your position. It was a case of "I've said BM is scum, now I have to prove it" rather than "I wonder if BM is town or scum".

I'm open to the idea that you're just town who got carried away, but I'll wait and see if you take a more objective line to appraising people going forward.

I love how you're telling me what I did <3
I love how you completely missing the face I'm a brainspewer.
I love how you're completely hooked on being defensive.
It's kinda cute (◍•ᴗ•◍)❤

In post 1306, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Taly it's because your avatar keeps changing like somebody who can't make up their mind in the loading screen

In post 1307, Taly wrote:Murder
1) Why Blitzo?
2) Can you explain game 2170 and how it relates to Pooky read? I don't agree with their "let's lim in the non-claims" because I think that can be role-fishy and motivation behind an agenda (oriented to getting people to work with their plans) is what I'm evaluating Pooky on rn.
3) Without ISOing Haschel, I relate to their arduous running relationship with the thread and reading... and I don't understand the scumreads on this slot because they seemed a bit based around him agreeing with Reck on mechanic POV

In post 1303, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1296, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1289, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1285, Battle Mage wrote:Flea is doing a lot of that LAMISTy stuff but it's superficial - long ISO cases which don't strike a balanced objective line, are a scum move I've used many times in my youth.

This is where you and I differ, you read my ISO as a case and as an attack, not me running over my thoughts on you and adjusting or confirming my read.

It's my thoughts, not a case. If people agree with it, they agree with it. If people want to supply me with non-meta information or differing ways of reading a post, then I'll sit, consider and adjust.

I'm a brain spewer I just put out whatevers in my head as I'm reading something.

I mean I don't think it's so much that "we differ", as you're wrong. There was no obvious attempt to "adjust" your read - you singled out a bunch of posts which were completely meaningless and objectively NAI, and tried to contrive to make them seem scummy to bolster your position. It was a case of "I've said BM is scum, now I have to prove it" rather than "I wonder if BM is town or scum".

I'm open to the idea that you're just town who got carried away, but I'll wait and see if you take a more objective line to appraising people going forward.

I love how you're telling me what I did <3
I love how you completely missing the face I'm a brainspewer.
I love how you're completely hooked on being defensive.
It's kinda cute (◍•ᴗ•◍)❤

In post 1304, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1302, Battle Mage wrote:i'm on board

VOTE: blitzo

├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤
├┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┤ . o O (At least put a robe on or something... x_x
├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤

In post 1183, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i think we need to start eliming in the no room claim pool


we can probly hit bad guys

and if they're townies we were never going to win this game

VOTE: Reck

my tolerance for gamethrowing is gone

In post 1196, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like the counterargument to the plan of "we cant let the scum know where we are" doesnt make sense when half the player list has already claimed their locations.

In post 1308, Taly wrote:also

i think this is the first time

Battle Mage

does not sus me in a game LMAO

does scum-

BM

really give

Flea

the benefit of the doubt here? 1296

In post 1309, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 1307, Taly wrote:Murder
1) Why Blitzo?
2) Can you explain game 2170 and how it relates to Pooky read? I don't agree with their "let's lim in the non-claims" because I think that can be role-fishy and motivation behind an agenda (oriented to getting people to work with their plans) is what I'm evaluating Pooky on rn.
3) Without ISOing Haschel, I relate to their arduous running relationship with the thread and reading... and I don't understand the scumreads on this slot because they seemed a bit based around him agreeing with Reck on mechanic POV

Anything for you Taly

1. Honestly, I am on board with no elim so this is kind of just a park vote representing my general read on Blitzo. All his posts are kind of hand wavy in a way I don't like. Like off the top of your head, can you remember any of Blitzo's reads? I remember there being some vague suspicion of me but other than that I can't remember. But then you read the iso and like there is stuff there, but I don't feel like any of it is actually changing the game at all if that makes sense. So basically, I think Blitzo is posting a lot of look busy fluff. I can give examples, but honestly I think it's kind of clear what I mean from a general skim of the iso.

In post 1309, MURDERCAT wrote:2. I think Pooky in death curse feels a lot more intentional compared to Pooky in 2170. Like the same kind of energy is there in both games, but I feel like it was directed differently, if that makes any sense. I SR'd Pooky in both games though so /shrug

3. I think HC is more likely scum than Reck because I expect scum to be less vocal than Reck is being if they want to try to derail the grouping. I am mostly null there though.

Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1308, Taly wrote:also

i think this is the first time

Battle Mage

does not sus me in a game LMAO

does scum-

BM

really give

Flea

the benefit of the doubt here? 1296

haha well you're in my neutral pile I guess!

and I certainly could - scum-BM is highly skilled!

In post 1272, SirCakez wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 567, Taly wrote:

murderkitties

, i like your 563 but i feel like your 365 went a bit hard onto a slot relatively early for the games pace

how has your

cakez

read progressed?

In post 565, Flea The Magician wrote: TAAAALLLLLYYYYYYYY!
1) How are you?
2) Who is your worst read at the moment?
3) Is there anything so far you disagree with?
4) Why are you upside down? ( ͜。 ͡ʖ ͜。)

1)

good, bout to get to college work, need to stop letting mafia distract haha

2)

no particular scumreads... need to reread

TGP

because they did not pass the vibe check.

alisae

passed the vibe check but not yet the deepwolf check. i think you are quite fluffy even with your wall, tbh - i want more concrete statements from you.

pooky

feels agenda-y but that doesnt ping me by itself.
i think the amount of times

reck

comes into this thread only to say

"i wont read and i denounce the threads mentality"

is genuine BUT is being used deflectively.
actually did not care for this readslist from

BM

In post 287, Battle Mage wrote:i think it's most likely that Alisae is town and Titus is scum. Akarin town, Pooky town, Cakez town.

felt very early to make reads on these players, at least mostly town-ones.

id rather

BM

just explain these reads. i think

OWER

prodded them at some point but if they replied, the answer wasnt noticeable enough for me to see it.

(maybe OWER prodded murderkitties instead)

3)

disagreement is not the correct word... more cautiously inquisitive. this town did not have a very cohesive start with everything considered.

4)

why i am upside down you ask?
my nails are lavender D:< not as red as my role PM or as green as what id want to brag they be.

Like look at this post for example
So much words but I don't actually get much from it?

Battle Mage wrote:I'm hard-town on Cakez

In post 1304, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1302, Battle Mage wrote:i'm on board

VOTE: blitzo

├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤
├┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┤ . o O (At least put a robe on or something... x_x
├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤

In post 1316, Taly wrote:

In post 1272, SirCakez wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 567, Taly wrote:

murderkitties

, i like your 563 but i feel like your 365 went a bit hard onto a slot relatively early for the games pace

how has your

cakez

read progressed?

In post 565, Flea The Magician wrote: TAAAALLLLLYYYYYYYY!
1) How are you?
2) Who is your worst read at the moment?
3) Is there anything so far you disagree with?
4) Why are you upside down? ( ͜。 ͡ʖ ͜。)

1)

good, bout to get to college work, need to stop letting mafia distract haha

2)

no particular scumreads... need to reread

TGP

because they did not pass the vibe check.

alisae

passed the vibe check but not yet the deepwolf check. i think you are quite fluffy even with your wall, tbh - i want more concrete statements from you.

pooky

feels agenda-y but that doesnt ping me by itself.
i think the amount of times

reck

comes into this thread only to say

"i wont read and i denounce the threads mentality"

is genuine BUT is being used deflectively.
actually did not care for this readslist from

BM

In post 287, Battle Mage wrote:i think it's most likely that Alisae is town and Titus is scum. Akarin town, Pooky town, Cakez town.

felt very early to make reads on these players, at least mostly town-ones.

id rather

BM

just explain these reads. i think

OWER

prodded them at some point but if they replied, the answer wasnt noticeable enough for me to see it.

(maybe OWER prodded murderkitties instead)

3)

disagreement is not the correct word... more cautiously inquisitive. this town did not have a very cohesive start with everything considered.

4)

why i am upside down you ask?
my nails are lavender D:< not as red as my role PM or as green as what id want to brag they be.

Like look at this post for example
So much words but I don't actually get much from it?

Cakez

, why are you only looking at one of my earliest posts, and one at a time for this?

Yeah, I don't believe your stance here.

In post 1318, Taly wrote:Shit.

My townreads are generally people who scumread each other.

BM-Flea

Pooky-Reck

Murder-Alisae

with

Gamma/OWER

floating off somewhere.

This gamestate sucks.

p-edit

Battle Mage wrote:I'm hard-town on Cakez

Case it.

In post 1319, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1304, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1302, Battle Mage wrote:i'm on board

VOTE: blitzo

├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤
├┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┤ . o O (At least put a robe on or something... x_x
├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤

What does this even mean

In post 1316, Taly wrote:

In post 1272, SirCakez wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 567, Taly wrote:

murderkitties

, i like your 563 but i feel like your 365 went a bit hard onto a slot relatively early for the games pace

how has your

cakez

read progressed?

In post 565, Flea The Magician wrote: TAAAALLLLLYYYYYYYY!
1) How are you?
2) Who is your worst read at the moment?
3) Is there anything so far you disagree with?
4) Why are you upside down? ( ͜。 ͡ʖ ͜。)

1)

good, bout to get to college work, need to stop letting mafia distract haha

2)

no particular scumreads... need to reread

TGP

because they did not pass the vibe check.

alisae

passed the vibe check but not yet the deepwolf check. i think you are quite fluffy even with your wall, tbh - i want more concrete statements from you.

pooky

feels agenda-y but that doesnt ping me by itself.
i think the amount of times

reck

comes into this thread only to say

"i wont read and i denounce the threads mentality"

is genuine BUT is being used deflectively.
actually did not care for this readslist from

BM

In post 287, Battle Mage wrote:i think it's most likely that Alisae is town and Titus is scum. Akarin town, Pooky town, Cakez town.

felt very early to make reads on these players, at least mostly town-ones.

id rather

BM

just explain these reads. i think

OWER

prodded them at some point but if they replied, the answer wasnt noticeable enough for me to see it.

(maybe OWER prodded murderkitties instead)

3)

disagreement is not the correct word... more cautiously inquisitive. this town did not have a very cohesive start with everything considered.

4)

why i am upside down you ask?
my nails are lavender D:< not as red as my role PM or as green as what id want to brag they be.

Like look at this post for example
So much words but I don't actually get much from it?

Cakez

, why are you only looking at one of my earliest posts, and one at a time for this?

Yeah, I don't believe your stance here.

It was a random example I could quote a dozen posts from your ISO
Why so defensive?

In post 1321, Battle Mage wrote:Taly-

let's just work outside of our respective townpools then. We aren't too far off each other tbh.

i've played 1 game with cakez town, and 1 game with cakez scum. In the nicest possible way, when he was scum he was completely obvscum, and when he was town he was pretty obviously town. As scum he got elimmed on Day 1 for basically trying to run a fake-meta gambit on me (as well as some other things i think). In this game, he's giving believable pro-town takes and coming across much more natural. I think cakez is sweet.

In post 1323, Taly wrote:let's just work outside of our respective townpools then. We aren't too far off each other tbh.