Posted: Tue May 11, 2021 7:42 am
ATTENTION DUELISTS!
MY HAIR HAS DECIDED THAT WE ELIMINATE BEEBOY!
MY HAIR HAS DECIDED THAT WE ELIMINATE BEEBOY!
and we trust our fate to the heart of the cards.
It was being proposed that we eliminate the slot even if it gets a replacement.In post 1292, Chara wrote:because a slot that doesn't post (not saying this is beeboy as the day is still young) gives zero information alive too, and they need to go before the endgame. i'd want to eliminate that slot regardless.In post 1288, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't understand why we should ever eliminate a slot that doesn't even post. The allignment indicative information we'd get out of that flip if scum is zero to none. And if they flip town it's even worse.
I don't think this is the case based on what I've seen. I think Beeboy has adopted this playstyle regardless of playstyle and also has happened to roll scum lately. I played with him a while ago and he definitely did not refuse to post as scum.in this case there happens to be evidence it is very AI for beeboy.
That's kind of sillyIn post 1311, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I mean if i was scum and i had someone like Beeboy as scum partner i would just buss him and say everyone who didn't vote him is scum.
this is why i'm proposing a non-beeboy wagon right now. i think Raya's scummy, we can talk about that.In post 1304, NorwegianboyEE wrote:But what if someone vigs Beeboy and we vote someone that will react more to pressure instead.
Whatever.In post 1313, unwnd wrote:So I take you don't want to clarify what you didn't understand and sweep the accusation under the rug? If that's a choice you make then I will read you on Beeboy's flip
but i find it so hard to say no to unwnd when they speak my language about trimming inactive slots. i'm just thinking pushing beeboy at this moment is less fun when there's a whole cornucopia of players.In post 1308, unwnd wrote:I believe that if Beeboy is just scum then not only do we eliminate scum but we garner reactions from partners as well. Limming inactive slots (especially in this case) is far more productive earlier on
I mean, for pooky, it just sounds like he's tired of playing with someone who does nothing as scum.. and I'd be annoyed at it as either alignment too...In post 1310, unwnd wrote:You also get a read out of Pooky who is the one spearhelding this lim, along with me
You're getting free information from players who actually want to play at the cost of nothing
Pretty good deal I'd say
if this is true it's a fair criticism of the eliminate beeboy idea, but i do find it hard to believe beeboy's just been joining games and then not playing them?In post 1305, Dwlee99 wrote:It was being proposed that we eliminate the slot even if it gets a replacement.In post 1292, Chara wrote:because a slot that doesn't post (not saying this is beeboy as the day is still young) gives zero information alive too, and they need to go before the endgame. i'd want to eliminate that slot regardless.In post 1288, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't understand why we should ever eliminate a slot that doesn't even post. The allignment indicative information we'd get out of that flip if scum is zero to none. And if they flip town it's even worse.I don't think this is the case based on what I've seen. I think Beeboy has adopted this playstyle regardless of playstyle and also has happened to roll scum lately. I played with him a while ago and he definitely did not refuse to post as scum.in this case there happens to be evidence it is very AI for beeboy.
I understand that too, and I definitely share Pooky's sentiment in regards to feeling annoyed with BeeboyIn post 1317, Chara wrote:but i find it so hard to say no to unwnd when they speak my language about trimming inactive slots. i'm just thinking pushing beeboy at this moment is less fun when there's a whole cornucopia of players.In post 1308, unwnd wrote:I believe that if Beeboy is just scum then not only do we eliminate scum but we garner reactions from partners as well. Limming inactive slots (especially in this case) is far more productive earlier on
okay, why?In post 1314, Chara wrote:i think Raya's scummy, we can talk about that.
In post 1288, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't understand why we should ever eliminate a slot that doesn't even post. The allignment indicative information we'd get out of that flip if scum is zero to none. And if they flip town it's even worse.
In post 1304, NorwegianboyEE wrote:But what if someone vigs Beeboy and we vote someone that will react more to pressure instead.
This is strange. NBEE suggests that 1) flipping Beeboy would give no information, 2) that we wait for to see if we have a vigilante, and 3) that well, maybe the scum are just trying to bus Beeboy. What I'm seeing is that NBEE has no consistent townread rationale for disagreeing with the Beeboy wagon, and is simply trying very hard to save Beeboy.In post 1311, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I mean if i was scum and i had someone like Beeboy as scum partner i would just buss him and say everyone who didn't vote him is scum.