Mafiascum.net

In post 13197, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Shading means one thing and one thing only: making something appear worse then it seems to be.

You’re missing the point. He continued to accuse me of that even after I clarified exactly what I meant. Had he dropped it after I explained it, it would have been fine.

In post 13174, butterflies wrote:I i initially gave you the benefit of the doubt because I understood that I failed to make myself clear. Now that I have. I find your response to me quite insulting because I have made it extremely clear what my point wqs, and you’re intentionally twisting it when I’ve made my point beyond abundantly clear.

I mean some of what he has said is eh. But most of what he said is correct. Like the shading and what I was doing last day and my track being justifiable is all accurate.

In post 13198, butterflies wrote:

In post 13187, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13159, Rad wrote:

In post 13155, butterflies wrote:No it isn’t “common sense”, not when you had far better options and objectively way more suspicious slots.

Like this i don't get. Is Drap scum for the decision? If so, push him, vote him, etc. Is he bad town for it? If so, why the hell are you throwing shade on him?

I mean this isn’t the issue.

The issue is not understanding the situation of why I tracked them when it was made clear by not just me but also you.

I know it isn’t the most optimal but it was justifiable and I find it odd people aren’t getting that.

I think RAD could possibly be pocketing you with this. He might disagree and dislike my opinion on that but while I think you genuinely misunderstood me, RAD continuing to call my opinion “shade” even after I clarified my read on you doesn’t really sit well with me. So my read on you is unchanged but I’m not liking RAD’s recent posts wrongly accusing me of that.

I really need to think more about this.

I somewhat agree with this.
I would say that from what I've read of Rad's latest posts, I'm no longer that opposed to a vote on him.
Also, just saying, I agree with Cytosine's solve somewhat.
-Guanine

In post 13199, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13169, butterflies wrote:

In post 13167, Rad wrote:

In post 13164, butterflies wrote:I think he’s town who made an extremely suboptimal track and both of you can bite me. I stand by that!

That's anti-town of you. Do you not get that?

That's how scum wants to play. Pressuring town by lowering confidence.

Get it? Stop being anti-town if you're town.

How is it anti-town? I would love to find out who killed T-Bone and because he wasted that track we still don’t know.

Isn’t this the opposite of what you said?
Or do you not agree with what BB said in regards to whom I should have tracked?


BTW just tracking your wolf reads all the time is actually -EV’s because it’s predictable.
Tracking a Null of someone based on their claim (even if a wolf read) is way better.

What is the opposite of what I said? I think a lot of people would have been much better tracks than me. Did you read my post wrt the Taly gladiate?

In post 13188, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:after we yeet rad we can yeet drap unless he produces a guilty for us

Why you setting up back to back ML’s for?

Miss Frog?

In post 13200, butterflies wrote:

In post 13197, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Shading means one thing and one thing only: making something appear worse then it seems to be.

You’re missing the point. He continued to accuse me of that even after I clarified exactly what I meant. Had he dropped it after I explained it, it would have been fine.

It was still shade.
Even if it wasn’t intentional

In post 13204, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13188, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:after we yeet rad we can yeet drap unless he produces a guilty for us

Why you setting up back to back ML’s for?

Miss Frog?

bro you need someone to work on your lines

you think you're dissing me but you're actually dissing yourself

In post 13201, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13174, butterflies wrote:I i initially gave you the benefit of the doubt because I understood that I failed to make myself clear. Now that I have. I find your response to me quite insulting because I have made it extremely clear what my point wqs, and you’re intentionally twisting it when I’ve made my point beyond abundantly clear.

I mean some of what he has said is eh. But most of what he said is correct. Like the shading and what I was doing last day and my track being justifiable is all accurate.

That’s not shading. Saying that I considered your track on me a waste and/or suboptimal may be possibly upsetting to you? but in what world is that shade?

The only part I think I i initially failed to be clear on is that I felt genuinely lied to when you told me that you tr me but you already clarified to me that you hadn’t, so yeah, initially I was very upset about that.

In post 13203, butterflies wrote:

In post 13199, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13169, butterflies wrote:

In post 13167, Rad wrote:

In post 13164, butterflies wrote:I think he’s town who made an extremely suboptimal track and both of you can bite me. I stand by that!

That's anti-town of you. Do you not get that?

That's how scum wants to play. Pressuring town by lowering confidence.

Get it? Stop being anti-town if you're town.

How is it anti-town? I would love to find out who killed T-Bone and because he wasted that track we still don’t know.

Isn’t this the opposite of what you said?
Or do you not agree with what BB said in regards to whom I should have tracked?


BTW just tracking your wolf reads all the time is actually -EV’s because it’s predictable.
Tracking a Null of someone based on their claim (even if a wolf read) is way better.

What is the opposite of what I said? I think a lot of people would have been much better tracks than me. Did you read my post wrt the Taly gladiate?

Didn’t you agree with BB that claim base tracks are better like whom BBT visited.

Anyone who thinks I'm pocketing drap here hasn't read the rest of the game because drap has hard town read me since the gladiate lol. And before that he hard scum read me.

If anything it's the other way around. But I think drap's prob just town here.

Can we just vote BBT, probably Red.

maybe you're just both scum together who cares about this fake pocketing bullshit lol

In post 13205, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13200, butterflies wrote:

In post 13197, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Shading means one thing and one thing only: making something appear worse then it seems to be.

You’re missing the point. He continued to accuse me of that even after I clarified exactly what I meant. Had he dropped it after I explained it, it would have been fine.

It was still shade.
Even if it wasn’t intentional

Saying I disagreed with your track isn’t shade, it’s my honest opinion. I didn’t initially clarify what I meant by saying you lied to me, so that part I can actually see but then I did very clearly clarify that and RAD continued to wrongly accuse me of that.

In post 13204, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13188, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:after we yeet rad we can yeet drap unless he produces a guilty for us

Why you setting up back to back ML’s for?

Miss Frog?

like what r u even trying to do in this comment rofl

it reads like you forgot you've been faking suspicion of me all night and decided to go straight to insulting me for missing on frog

except insulting me for missing on frog only makes sense if you know i'm town

and you've been insinuating i'm not town for a while now

so its like you're slipping TMI along with your half assed insults lol

In post 13208, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13203, butterflies wrote:

In post 13199, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 13169, butterflies wrote:

In post 13167, Rad wrote:

In post 13164, butterflies wrote:I think he’s town who made an extremely suboptimal track and both of you can bite me. I stand by that!

That's anti-town of you. Do you not get that?

That's how scum wants to play. Pressuring town by lowering confidence.

Get it? Stop being anti-town if you're town.

How is it anti-town? I would love to find out who killed T-Bone and because he wasted that track we still don’t know.

Isn’t this the opposite of what you said?
Or do you not agree with what BB said in regards to whom I should have tracked?


BTW just tracking your wolf reads all the time is actually -EV’s because it’s predictable.
Tracking a Null of someone based on their claim (even if a wolf read) is way better.

What is the opposite of what I said? I think a lot of people would have been much better tracks than me. Did you read my post wrt the Taly gladiate?

Didn’t you agree with BB that claim base tracks are better like whom BBT visited.

Well then you’d probably be able to clear him for that no? My point was that you were sussing on other slots, which was what my point was about.

cuz like it's not an insult to insult me for "missing" on frog if i'm scum

cuz if i'm scum I didn't miss on frog

its like you can't keep your shit straight when you come with the shade

you want to set me up as a mislim with your fake paranoia

but you forget to maintain the paranoia when i piss you off with my halfassed barely trying play so you insult my accuracy

except insulting accuracy doesnt even make sense if you're paranoid of me cuz it's not an INSULT to someone's scumhunting ability if they miss and you think they're SCUM

cuz you see

the goal of scum

is to kill townies lolol

In post 13210, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Can we just vote BBT, probably Red.

He hardclaimed Jack and roles and flavour are connected. No one CC’d his flavour claim. No town neighbours have been flipped and why wouldn’t you even wait for him to claim his NAs?

cuz Drapion is mafia

In post 13216, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:cuz like it's not an insult to insult me for "missing" on frog if i'm scum

cuz if i'm scum I didn't miss on frog

its like you can't keep your shit straight when you come with the shade

you want to set me up as a mislim with your fake paranoia

but you forget to maintain the paranoia when i piss you off with my halfassed barely trying play so you insult my accuracy

except insulting accuracy doesnt even make sense if you're paranoid of me cuz it's not an INSULT to someone's scumhunting ability if they miss and you think they're SCUM

cuz you see

the goal of scum

is to kill townies lolol

But Drap caught Bella, do you think that was somehow coordinated?

bussing is fine

In post 13218, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:cuz Drapion is mafia

So your theory is that he claimed to track me because?

Wow, my head is spinning rn

like dude is a claimed investigative who's somehow survived multiple nights post claim and done jack-all since his big "catch" while unclaimed cleared players get shot

smells fishy af to me

In post 13221, butterflies wrote:

In post 13218, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:cuz Drapion is mafia

So your theory is that he claimed to track me because?

Wow, my head is spinning rn

cuz he probly doesnt want to get caught in a lie tracking someone with a NA?

i dont really know who cares

VOTE: RAD

His continuing to accuse me of shading when I clearly am not isn’t sitting well with me but I don’t like Drap trying to run up BBT when he hasn’t even gotten a chance to claim.

But if you’re right, it could explain alot with his hard defenses and jumping on me here and calling me ninja.