Page 54 of 116

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:45 am
by Cephrir
In post 1324, TheIrishPope wrote:When someone references psychological stuff... they're probably scum.
So yeah orcinus vote is best vote.
In post 1319, likeabauss wrote:
In post 1158, Angry Frat BROs wrote:
Spoiler:
2) Guilty Conscience (psychobabble) Talked about it previously.


AKA BULLSHIT THAT YOU'RE SPEWING TO MAKE ME LOOK WORSE
This isn't really an appropriate response. You can't just say "BS" to refute an argument. Here's a primer on how word choices provide insights into the brain:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/let ... they-speak
There are much more in depth applications. It can be very effective, until the subject (you in this case) is aware that reading of that nature is going on. (This is a big part of why I keep my cases to myself, and don't always explain my reads in great detail. These are some cool tools that I use frequently in mafia, but the more I talk about them the less effective they become with people who are aware.)
...???

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:48 am
by likeabauss
In post 1324, TheIrishPope wrote:When someone references psychological stuff... they're probably scum.
So yeah orcinus vote is best vote.
TIP, this doesn't work in my mind. Are you saying I'm probably scum for referencing psychobabble?

You know I do psychobabble stuff all the time, alignment regardless.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:48 am
by TheIrishPope
Hey I'm just saying.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:49 am
by TheIrishPope
Like, I don't think anything you've done up to this point has been scummy enough to warrant a vote, but you have a pretty strong scumgame

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:55 am
by goodmorning
i keep forgetting to check and see if i need to prod people

what a lazy mod

Votecount 1.41

Angry Frat BROs [L-4] - likeabauss, Toomai, Hermy, RadiantCowbells, PeregrineV


orcinus_theoriginal [L-5] - Sakura Hana, sangres, TheIrishPope, Guyett

JacobSavage [L-6] - MC Maraca, Cephrir, yessiree

Sakura Hana [L-8] - orcinus_theoriginal

likeabauss [L-8] - Angry Frat BROs

Not Voting [3] - JacobSavage, caledfwitch, MVP

With 17 alive, it takes
9
to lynch. The day will end in (expired on 2013-11-20 09:39:00)


Prodding caledfwitch.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:56 am
by TheIrishPope
I don't see no cat wtf.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:57 am
by TheIrishPope
Anyway this is a failing wagon I'm out.
UNVOTE: orcinus
His shitty ass AtE didn't convince me, but he's not getting lynched today, no matter how hard I try

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:59 am
by Guyett
wut?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:44 am
by TheIrishPope
I don't understand your question

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:39 am
by Guyett
how is it a failing wagon?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:10 am
by yessiree
There is no reason for the orc wagon to diffuse right now.

He's just trying to lurk it out while using "calming his head" as an excuse until the attention is diverted elsewhere.

I still would like a JS lynch but orc lynch has my support if needed.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:02 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 1226, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:im busy til tuesday night
you gayass shit.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:02 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
sorry i take that back

ur not a gayass shit

but you're seriously pissing me off.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:26 pm
by yessiree
not busy enough

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:02 pm
by likeabauss
Orcinus, when I'm a townie and its D1, it always makes me uncomfortable when somebody I haven't really interacted with much jumps into a fight with a third party to defend me. I mean, I'm a big boy... I can defend myself. Plus, that person usually doesn't have any business defending me, especially if they haven't sorted me yet (and may not have sorted the third party.)

So there was me coming at you, and two folks who clearly jumped in to discredit/debate my attack on you (AngryFratBros and MC Maraca.) Now:
1) if you're town (which we know you aren't) you'd be suspicious of two meat heads randomly defending you. Seems like good/reasonable play to me.
2) if you're scum (which you are), a reasonably good play would be to setup a lynch on either or both of the two if they were townies by feigning suspicion of their defending. It'd be an easy angle to press, especially if you had an annoying egotistical and highly suspicious player that'd help (that's me.)

But you've done neither of the above.

In this scenario/narrative above, explain what I'm missing from your perspective.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:42 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 1339, likeabauss wrote:1) if you're town (which we know you aren't) you'd be suspicious of two meat heads randomly defending you. Seems like good/reasonable play to me.
because your case on me is shit

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:45 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
rank's meta doesn't support your claim which is why you've refused to provide it despite it being the obviously townie thing to do

so that's why you're slinging mud on me and asking me to be lynched second because when i flip town you have no excuse anymore

i've fooled myself for long enough

VOTE: bauss

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:45 pm
by Cephrir
In post 1339, likeabauss wrote:1) if you're town (which we know you aren't) you'd be suspicious of two meat heads randomly defending you. Seems like good/reasonable play to me.
As a townie who is only not arguing with your cases because people usually yell at him when he answers questions not directed at him, this logic is stupid.

I may just start answering things that aren't directed at me though because I'm rapidly getting sick of feeling like I'm sitting here helpless to stop these stupid wagons.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:46 pm
by Cephrir
In post 1341, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:rank's meta doesn't support your claim which is why you've refused to provide it despite it being the obviously townie thing to do

so that's why you're slinging mud on me and asking me to be lynched second because when i flip town you have no excuse anymore

i've fooled myself for long enough

VOTE: bauss
Seriously bauss,
why the fuck will you not provide examples of this meta you're touting if it exists?
There is no protown reason to withhold this.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:59 pm
by RadiantCowbells
There's a big leaning town one though: laziness.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:05 pm
by yessiree
@cephir, have you even worn the same trousers, walking home at midnight while shitfaced with someone else?

no you haven't

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:10 pm
by Cephrir
Does he really strike you as the lazy type, given the effort he's put into his cases... and his willingness to link to other things...?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:16 pm
by yessiree
bauss's got something, I can feel it

I also love how flipping mad orc is, I enjoy every single bit of it

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:19 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
I am in no way obliged to take this shit.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:22 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
I don't mind when people scumread me.

I mind when I get 50 trollvotes hopping on a reason that's not related to me and when I ask for actual proof for said reason nothing happens

I am not obliged, believe it or not, to do anything for this town. I am not obliged to entertain you by assuming your posts come from a place where thought actually occurs


I am honestly not enjoying myself at all right now.