Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2013 2:17 am
Dunno
My reads are in total jumble
My reads are in total jumble
Dunno
Well that seems like bullshit, considering you should have a hell of a town block right now. I know I do!
Did you cop Rufflig last night?In post 1328, GuyInFreezer wrote:Normally I should've but I don't for many reasons and I won't bother listing why
But i can say this though: so far my townblocs are all of your scumreads.
In post 1328, GuyInFreezer wrote:Normally I should've but I don't for many reasons and I won't bother listing why
But i can say this though: so far my townblocs are all of your scumreads.
It was either that or option 2In post 1330, Nachomamma8 wrote:Did you cop Rufflig last night?In post 1328, GuyInFreezer wrote:Normally I should've but I don't for many reasons and I won't bother listing why
But i can say this though: so far my townblocs are all of your scumreads.
Considering I don't know what the hell the township is, no. It isn't.In post 1335, Minami no Hana wrote:Isn't the townslip I mentioned long time ago is not enough for you?
In post 651, Minami no Hana wrote:Random ISO when I have a time~
(This will help me form an updated readlist eventually by the time I finish ISOing.)
Asking a good question.In post 62, pitoli wrote:And I didn't like this. Why not let Orci explain why you're town instead of running to the meta assumption?In post 57, Kazekirimaru wrote:Kaze is so town because he's early aggressive omgz
Yes, I am aware of my meta.
The first paragraph is a townslip if not towntell.In post 98, pitoli wrote:Because it's totally possible someone wouldn't have thought "blue townie" was a literal description of the PM sitting in their inbox. I for one thought you were speaking figuratively so it's weird to me that you would jump on that and assume scum would try to be "in" on a role PM that could be easily verified by the OP.In post 67, Kazekirimaru wrote:Why not?In post 61, pitoli wrote:No, I didn't like that test either, Kaze.
Mmm yeah that's m'bad.That was to fferyborkIn post 62, pitoli wrote: And I didn't like this. Why not let Orci explain why you're town instead of running to the meta assumption?
I am not surprised to see hedginess from a newbie. The part I don't like, however, is that Fuzzylogic seems to be repeating "you are observing X about me, and saying X is scummy. however, town can also do X" and yeah zzzzzzz
The second paragraph, as I said (I think I said it), I'm leaning towards the playstyle clash.
Townslip #2.In post 101, pitoli wrote:Fair enough. I remembered seeing the town wincon and for some reason assumed the rest was there. But still, you don't think it's a possibility that Fuzzy was not taking you at face value when you said "blue"?In post 99, Kazekirimaru wrote:How is the role PM verified by the OP? I don't see any example role PMs, do you?In post 98, pitoli wrote: Because it's totally possible someone wouldn't have thought "blue townie" was a literal description of the PM sitting in their inbox. I for one thought you were speaking figuratively so it's weird to me that you would jump on that and assume scum would try to be "in" on a role PM that could be easily verified by the OP.
As far as her general posts goes, it's not aggresssive. I played with pitoli once when she was scum and replaced out. In there, I remember she going aggressive against her pushes (also with a long post = long dick joke lol). In this game, she didn't look aggressive against her pushes so I guess that's another townpoint for her. Also, her general posts looked townish.
So I think she's town.
(1/12)
Want to know what my paranoia of Nacho has gotten me in the past? Nothing. Nacho was town. I'll start getting paranoid when I see a solid reason to suspect Nacho. I can't make a case on Nacho that does not depend on a flip that we do not have. In general, I do not make relational cases without flips. When I have made such a case before a flip, it was because there was a strong connection. However, I've always marked it as a conditional case if x flips scum. I do not recall ever acting on a relational case without a scum flip.In post 1294, Tammy wrote:Seriously Rufflig - No paranoia on Nacho at all, not even a little bit?
I did, but now I need to sort out Minami's claim and sort out why Tammy claims Pitoli is a cop that cleared Nacho. I don't see where Pitoli made such a claim. My initial thought was this is a semi role madness game, so x-shots of different sorts of cops is possible. Then I remembered Kaze's claim and that we have a quasi name cop floating about as well. Even with x-shots this seems to be getting a bit too town sided. Something isn't adding up.In post 1283, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ Ruff
What , No scum reads??
Who do think needs to be lynched??
No? I'm not asking you to be suspicious of Nacho; it felt off that you weren't paranoid at all and just wrote him off as town without much thought, which I thought was possible if you were scum and he was town.In post 1347, The Rufflig wrote:
If you want me to be suspicious of Nacho then present something to be suspicious of. As far as I can tell, your paranoia of Nacho depends on my alignment. Since I know I'm town, I know your case on Nacho is wrong.
I did, but now I need to sort out Minami's claim and sort out why Tammy claims Pitoli is a cop that cleared Nacho. I don't see where Pitoli made such a claim. My initial thought was this is a semi role madness game, so x-shots of different sorts of cops is possible. Then I remembered Kaze's claim and that we have a quasi name cop floating about as well. Even with x-shots this seems to be getting a bit too town sided. Something isn't adding up.[/quote]In post 1283, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ Ruff
What , No scum reads??
Who do think needs to be lynched??