Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:46 pm
Explain this please. Jingle's not even on the wagon. Nor am I.In post 1324, Squirrel Girl wrote:For me, that votecount is why I suspect Jingle, really.
Page 54 of 99
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:03 pm
jingle is on the wagon. as shroomish
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:04 pm
Oh bah you are right.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:12 pm
UNVOTE:
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:54 pm
No action came from me
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:59 pm
I sat home and got drunk
Aka no action.
So I guess that's it. We all claimed VTs but for Anti.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:05 pm
So now does Dr reorganize the list and we all actually claim, or what?
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:06 pm
CONFIRMED
sweeeeeeeeeeeet
sweeeeeeeeeeeet
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:06 pm
also, blocked guy last night, but that doesn't really help us
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:09 pm
I don't know why I bolded that
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:09 pm
ok so before any grand reveal stuff, just to make sure:
everyone is 100% committed to what they said? if you are a PR and you were waiting to hear this sorta list, now is the time to say it.
everyone is 100% committed to what they said? if you are a PR and you were waiting to hear this sorta list, now is the time to say it.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:10 pm
im also taking all no action claims as VT claims, if it isnt the case please say so
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:10 pm
I'm just a plain old VT
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:12 pm
i suspected as much knowing SC's mod meta, though i'm a little surprised scum didn't gambit because they probably could have gotten me lynchedIn post 1336, Dr Pants wrote:im also taking all no action claims as VT claims, if it isnt the case please say so
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:23 pm
I confirm, VT.In post 1335, Dr Pants wrote:ok so before any grand reveal stuff, just to make sure:
everyone is 100% committed to what they said? if you are a PR and you were waiting to hear this sorta list, now is the time to say it.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:24 pm
I never thought someone could drag things out more than ika though.In post 1335, Dr Pants wrote:ok so before any grand reveal stuff, just to make sure:
everyone is 100% committed to what they said? if you are a PR and you were waiting to hear this sorta list, now is the time to say it.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:26 pm
haha i just need to be sure that no one was waiting to claim correctly cause its gonna fuck up the conclusions if thats the case
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:29 pm
Dr. Pants, let them explain later. The way massclaim works is you don't lie, or you accept the suspicion that comes with lying.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:33 pm
i need to hear specifically from snork. ika suspected that if anyone was to have a PR, it would be snork. snork's push for doing the mass claim in this specific way suggested to me as well that snork might have a PR. so I need to hear if snork has a PR.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:42 pm
God... that paragraph structure just took me back to school.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:48 pm
In post 1327, Titus wrote:Oh bah you are right.
Not really, I think Snork was softing something. I think I get to lynch you anyway ::sharpens knives::
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:50 pm
This was extremely underwhelming. I was hoping you had something up your sleeve.In post 1330, Titus wrote:I sat home and got drunk
Aka no action.
So I guess that's it. We all claimed VTs but for Anti.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:51 pm
No I don't. I'm a VT. I just work really well with that kind of stuff and I was hoping for something spectacular.In post 1343, Dr Pants wrote:i need to hear specifically from snork. ika suspected that if anyone was to have a PR, it would be snork. snork's push for doing the mass claim in this specific way suggested to me as well that snork might have a PR. so I need to hear if snork has a PR.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:52 pm
So.. yeah I guess anti is town. That's nice. My paranoia was eating at me.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:53 pm
Awww, I never get any fun. ::puts away knives::.