In post 60, Smithereens wrote:First Thoughts: 'Damn 3 pages already this game is hella active'
*reads the game*
3 people engaged in small chat... :\
VOTE: Creature
Somewhat serious vote, not entirely RVS. There's absolutely no way you're getting a town read from the very first post a person makes in the game. If you could I'd just copy/paste that post everywhere I went as scum and you'd be none the wiser. Possible that Creature is buddying, I don't like how he talks about 'early town activity' or some shit like that as if he's trying to seem a part of it.
tbh I am not so sure on a scum!Smith, but I don't feel safe saying he's town.
Is it possible scum wanted to kill Dwlee99 to WIFOM Smith?
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:17 am
by Creature
^ I think mafia killed Dwlee99 because:
- SK would see Robbnva more as a threat to him rather than mafia who's just eliminating strong town reads and keeping WIFOM in the game.
- I don't think a vigilante would shoot Dwlee99, some showed paranoia but I don't see someone doing a hero vig here.
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:18 am
by Creature
In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for
In post 105, F-oh-ex wrote:Aaaaaand they're mostly shitposting, w-w-wow.
Not sure how you can say it's mostly shit posting. Lots of game discussion has taken place in the past 2/3 pages.
What's your opinion on these discussions? The serious votes on me, the serious vote on creature, the refusal to give opinions on those 2 things by atm?
Any thoughts at all?
Let me read it 2-3 times and I'll present my opinion. I'd rather not form a serious opinion on spot after one read if I weren't there while the discussion was happening at all. When I am forced to catch up (and I often am due to time zones), I prefer to take a few horus to read everything carefully a few times.
"I'd rather not form a serious opinion on spot after one read" Scum
"When I am forced to catch up" Town
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:23 am
by Creature
In post 127, Smithereens wrote:I'll give Dwlee benefit of doubt and assume he's being antagonistic for the sake of arguments/activity. Not an ideal tact imo given all the activity, so take the hint.
are you trying to start a wagon or just get more out of them? (seeing as they only have 2 posts and i frankly can't get enough from that to place a legitimate vote)
In post 127, Smithereens wrote:I'll give Dwlee benefit of doubt and assume he's being antagonistic for the sake of arguments/activity. Not an ideal tact imo given all the activity, so take the hint.
he's gonna play that way regardless of what you say to him