Page 54 of 107

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:29 am
by Parmigiano Reggiano
In post 1324, Reality Check wrote:Oh btw what did parm claim? It was the parry anybody thing right?
In post 1170, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote: I will flip town, yes. I'm the Town Enhanced Parrier, I can parry anyone regardless of who they're voting. They switch to Not Voting and they forfeit the right to vote the player they were parried from for the rest of the DP.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:30 am
by Brigitte
In post 1301, RadiantCowbells wrote:I want Brigitte
Not interested.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:41 am
by Brigitte
@Mod VLA till Friday

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:52 am
by Reality Check
Has it been tested?

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:53 am
by Parmigiano Reggiano
In post 1328, Reality Check wrote:Has it been tested?
No, I'd rather not since it's once per game.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:43 am
by mbaki
beep boop beep im a sheep

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:45 am
by mbaki
if reality check is going to hard block the other scummy slots

VOTE: Varsoon

VOTE: Michael Scott

VOTE: Varsoon

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:47 am
by mbaki
In post 1329, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:
In post 1328, Reality Check wrote:Has it been tested?
No, I'd rather not since it's once per game.
and regardless of alignment, fake claiming a provable role like that is dumb so that is his real role (or at least part of it) if he's scum

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:51 am
by mbaki
In post 1294, Reality Check wrote:I knew joining this game was a bad idea
thank you, next

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:52 am
by mbaki
In post 1295, RadiantCowbells wrote:Your reads are obscene

I might just replace out this game is awful
needy

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:55 am
by mbaki
In post 1298, RadiantCowbells wrote:Oh wait Brigitte is town too
Oh wait parmigiana is town too
imagine

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:55 am
by mbaki
In post 1308, JohnnyEnglish wrote:So, back to the Alonzo wagon. Choo choo.

Upon review, I do not think that Fractured or Brigitte is scum. I am not necessarily opposed to a compromise wagon on GuiltyLion now. But I would strongly prefer Alonzo being lynched.

Could we get more votes on him please?
break up with your girlfriend, i'm bored

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:02 am
by Fractured
You're right, the next time someone tries to tell me the earth is flat, I'll just keep my mouth shut because telling them I disagree is the same thought process used to support anti-vacc argument.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:03 am
by mbaki
In post 1337, Fractured wrote:You're right, the next time someone tries to tell me the earth is flat, I'll just keep my mouth shut because telling them I disagree is the same thought process used to support anti-vacc argument.
ooh, another good example! but yours only works the other way around. burden of proof is on the accusing party, not on the defender.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:04 am
by Fractured
The fact that you don't fundamentally disagree with anti-vacc is probably the least surprising thing here.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:05 am
by Fractured
In post 1338, mbaki wrote:
In post 1337, Fractured wrote:You're right, the next time someone tries to tell me the earth is flat, I'll just keep my mouth shut because telling them I disagree is the same thought process used to support anti-vacc argument.
ooh, another good example! but yours only works the other way around. burden of proof is on the accusing party, not on the defender.
Actually, you're backwards. Burden of Proof is on the claimant.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:05 am
by mbaki
that is what i just said, yes

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:06 am
by Fractured
The fact that one part is accusatory in court is due to the fact that the accusatory party makes a claim. But thank you for that excellent example of a situation where correlation does not imply causation.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:07 am
by Fractured
In post 1341, mbaki wrote:that is what i just said, yes
No, it's not.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:09 am
by mbaki
the claimant is the accusing party, in legal terms the plaintiff

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:11 am
by Fractured
In post 1344, mbaki wrote:the claimant is the accusing party, in legal terms the plaintiff
Behold! A correlation! Burden of Proof lies on the claimant, and the claimant is the accusatory party in court.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:11 am
by Fractured
In post 1338, mbaki wrote:
In post 1337, Fractured wrote:You're right, the next time someone tries to tell me the earth is flat, I'll just keep my mouth shut because telling them I disagree is the same thought process used to support anti-vacc argument.
ooh, another good example! but yours only works the other way around. burden of proof is on the accusing party, not on the defender.
"Someone tries to tell me" = "someone makes a claim" that person is the claimant, and burden of proof lies on them.

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:20 am
by mbaki
= somebody makes an accusation, yes. then the defending party disproves the evidence or argues or w.e legal term you want

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:27 am
by Parmigiano Reggiano
This is fun, which one of you is scum

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:29 am
by Parmigiano Reggiano
In post 1348, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:This is fun, which one of you is scum
Also which head is talking rn