Mafiascum.net

Fusco please give me some reads. The only ones I've seen out of you are bad.

In post 1325, chennisden wrote:Fusco please give me some reads. The only ones I've seen out of you are bad.

Like what which ones

your meta is not this

me - 1 - 0 - tmck

The only read which you've articulated is me, and there's a weird townread on Oka.

Like I don't think Oka is necessarily scum but your reasoning is meh.

hunh?

ank is town
mbuki is town
tmnt is town
taly = town
and various others in my iso

oka is town because theyre pushing their scumreeeeeads
and they arent pushing any one agenda.


do you think oka is fishing for a low hanger?

In post 1327, Fuscosco wrote:your meta is not this

how would u know

i barely even have a meta

In post 1331, Fuscosco wrote:oka is town because theyre pushing their scumreeeeeads
and they arent pushing any one agenda.


do you think oka is fishing for a low hanger?

shadowless is the very definition of low hanging

In post 1333, chennisden wrote:

In post 1331, Fuscosco wrote:oka is town because theyre pushing their scumreeeeeads
and they arent pushing any one agenda.


do you think oka is fishing for a low hanger?

shadowless is the very definition of low hanging

I'm worried about this too. I liked the push, but I'm getting vibes because its hardcore shadow all the time and I didnt like okay response

Fusco, why is Ank town to you?

- Floor

what's wrong with the low hanging fruit?

In post 1333, chennisden wrote:shadowless is the very definition of low hanging

I mean its generating content.

How dont you have a meta? Hasnt this whole game been about speculating the 8ball and your liklihood of being it?



Im used to you being quiet.

^ tmck would generate more content

bef would generate more content

In post 1336, OkaPoka wrote:what's wrong with the low hanging fruit?

because you know the case is terrible?

In post 1335, NanceFloor wrote:Fusco, why is Ank town to you?

- Floor

Feel. They have read the game, analyzed it to their own standards, which Im used to, and this:

In post 1316, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1314, themilkcartonkid wrote:Does anyone agree that ank jumping all over the place with votes might be obfuscation?

that's not a typical scum strategy for me

This is not something I would ever say as scum. Until I do, of course.


Besides, how is ank voting 5 places in 5 posts scum obfuscation? its not even on a VC. At best, its trolling. Except it isnt. I have a modest TR on them

In post 1338, chennisden wrote:bef

Im kind of willing to do this.

theyve died down since they caught some heat

In post 1339, chennisden wrote:

In post 1336, OkaPoka wrote:what's wrong with the low hanging fruit?

because you know the case is terrible?

what about my case is worse than the case that exists on tmck?

Im of the opinion that ank will scumslip through sheer content at this rate if they are scum.

at least, Im confident that I can read a scum ank here.

The obfuscation argument was not mine.

Oka, read on tmck right now?

- Floor

i was talking about shadowless, not tmck.

In post 1345, chennisden wrote:i was talking about shadowless, not tmck.

why is the shadowless case worse than the tmck case?

In post 1344, NanceFloor wrote:The obfuscation argument was not mine.

Oka, read on tmck right now?

- Floor

lynching tmck is lynching at variance in my opinion

In post 1346, OkaPoka wrote:

In post 1345, chennisden wrote:i was talking about shadowless, not tmck.

why is the shadowless case worse than the tmck case?

theres nothing to case. it's literally impossible to case.

what are you going to do, analyze every nook and cranny of someone who's not even here?

In post 1347, OkaPoka wrote:

In post 1344, NanceFloor wrote:The obfuscation argument was not mine.

Oka, read on tmck right now?

- Floor

lynching tmck is lynching at variance in my opinion

This is not a read.