Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:11 pm
wait a second who's this ultimateprank guy?
oh this is actually pretty scummy if trueIn post 1321, UltimatePlank wrote:this was the only point that Salad voted Looker, the rest of the day prior his votes were either myself, Wake, or Saudade but he never really said much about why and totally avoided having an opinion about the Looker wagonIn post 662, Saladman27 wrote:I’ll hammer, I guess. I mean who needs a claim when you can have a flip?
VOTE: Look
why did you come in just to unvote me and make that comment?
I'm not saying it's the best play but considering that we have two claimed protective power roles that are both N3 only and there are no counter claims, I am forced to conclude that there were no blocked kills N1-3In post 1323, Eve wrote:nokilling the first 3 nights is a really dumb strat
why is there even discussion based around the fact scum might've done that volunteerily? they didn't
Can we do Eve? Look at her reaction to your postIn post 1309, UltimatePlank wrote:why in the everloving fuck are we voting elbirn
stop voting elbirn
VOTE: Saladman
this is a better wagon
On a side note, Eve's contributed more than you have this game.In post 1335, Saladman27 wrote:VOTE: Eve I’m thinking she’s hopping on wagons as they gain traction, hoping for a mislynch. I mean that response to plank’s argument about mean just screams to me “i have a valid reason to mislynch, thanks plank!”
That is, to me, a pro town post. I also thought Alim’s pfp was fozzie bear.In post 516, alimdia wrote:At this point Looker's wall of posts, the contents in there towards me are just 90% saying 'nothing' and straight up misdirection
A prime example is...Except your post 334, 393, 403 are not pre-Day 1 anymore. Its after a crapload of stuff has happenedIn post 504, Looker wrote:Are you expecting reads to be given out pre-Day 1? Where do you think they come from? They're derived in-game from interactions, so I don't see why you'd expect them to be telegraphed in RVSIn post 487, alimdia wrote:No you had 0 mention of wake, and then suddenly you assume wake is town. 0 analysis in between. You didn't express any reads in between.
In post 438, alimdia wrote:Your 334 said that you haven't read wake yet.In post 435, Looker wrote:I feel it was opportunistic scum, honestly. When people don't have to give reasoning, anybody can jump on a wagon.In post 405, profii wrote:Lack of protest of the wake wagon falling down is noted. Any thoughts from anyone?
Your 393 and 403 also don't mention wake.
Your next post, which is the post I am quoting, suddenly straight up slips that wake is town. Hmm? Where did that sudden town read come from? I think it's definitely a slip
If we assume that's an accident.... who is the opportunistic scum on the wagon? Why is your vote on Elements, who needed to be prodded by the mod and thus actually hasn't posted in a while.You're scum for straight up saying wake is town with 0 prior mentions of wake and also still not analysing the wagon?In post 504, Looker wrote: I really don't get your case. You say I'm scum for finding Wake's wagon suspicious, but you weren't on it either. I legit thought this was you being upset over the trash comment.
Also I already disproven by my posts earlier: "being upset over the trash comment"
Scum doesn't act scummy on purpose. In fact they try their best to not look scummy.
What I look for are what they don't do, contradictions and posts that imply prior knowledge.
You:
1) didnt investigate wake wagon still. Its been a couple days. Every time we talk about it, you talk about me, answer other stuff, instead of analyzing the wake wagon.
2) You imply prior knowledge of wake being town when you had 0 mentions about wake before. Yes I expect reads to be given out before you make a statement that implies you 'know' they are town.
I'm probably done responding to Looker's walls unless theres anything new there. So far its more of the same.
This was an unvote on wake after his outburst when he thought he was lynched. Nothing to do with you.
This killed meIn post 1322, Elbirn wrote:Yeah that's cool and all but is Saladman27 "smart" enough to no kill the first 3 nights just to fuck with us?
What reactions and what's wrong with it?In post 1332, alimdia wrote:Can we do Eve? Look at her reaction to your postIn post 1309, UltimatePlank wrote:why in the everloving fuck are we voting elbirn
stop voting elbirn
VOTE: Saladman
this is a better wagon
No I just agreed with the logic on you - I could've kept voting for wake or elbirn you know or kept my vote on Elements - you're just looking for a reason to vote me because you know I'm a potential lynch todayIn post 1335, Saladman27 wrote:VOTE: Eve I’m thinking she’s hopping on wagons as they gain traction, hoping for a mislynch. I mean that response to plank’s argument about mean just screams to me “i have a valid reason to mislynch, thanks plank!”