Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 3:22 am
EP, it seems like you’re the only one who wants to be outed, so here we go. Your flavour is “ “
I don't actually know for sure if those were the exact action types that were used - just that the players in question had been targeted.In post 1324, gobbledygook wrote:I mean Egix is confirming those actions happened to those players so
Ni?In post 1328, pisskop wrote:Except ni?
Ive already claimed my flavor.In post 1325, eyestott wrote:EP, it seems like you’re the only one who wants to be outed, so here we go. Your flavour is “ “
I legit thought of that first too!In post 1332, eyestott wrote:Also I just lost the game fml
This doesn't help prove my point because you already know my role now. You need to reveal someone's flavour who's role is still unknown to prove that you know the player's' flavour instead of the role flavour.In post 1325, eyestott wrote:EP, it seems like you’re the only one who wants to be outed, so here we go. Your flavour is “ “
I agree with pk on this. This lynch feels important and people have information, but nobody wants to give enough information to help steer the lynch.In post 1335, eyestott wrote:Who’s doing the teeth pulling, pk?
you mean the 3 way masonry chat?
wtf does this mean? Explain?In post 1326, Egix96 wrote:I don't actually know for sure if those were the exact action types that were used - just that the players in question had been targeted.In post 1324, gobbledygook wrote:I mean Egix is confirming those actions happened to those players so
I said I didn't send a letter saying guilty. My receipent said they received my mail so...In post 1338, EspressoPatronum wrote:I agree with pk on this. This lynch feels important and people have information, but nobody wants to give enough information to help steer the lynch.In post 1335, eyestott wrote:Who’s doing the teeth pulling, pk?
- Egix just now confirmed the TARGETS but not the actions claimed by eyestott + the letter
- Eyestott won't reveal the full contents of the letter to protect the identity of the JoaT
- The JoaT hasn't revealed
- alim is a mailman who hasn't said what he sent
There's more information that people are holding, but the above is/may be relevant to the lynch.
Whether or not the holding of information today has been the correct play, trying to get said information definitely feels like pulling teeth.
Er I never saw the post where you hinted at my flavor? CAn you qutoe againIn post 1339, eyestott wrote:Pretty much everyone has an assumed role now, thanks to gobble making those guesses
But alimdia should be able to confirm that I knew their flavour from the get go, as would Mastina if she were alive, and Gobble If he looks back at the first few posts directed at STRQ. (Gobbles flavour is a lyric from never gonna give you up, so I dropped references to other lyrics in my early convos with STRQ)
In post 51, eyestott wrote:Nah, I'm Majiffy
lol jk
In all seriousness, I needed a new avatar so elbirn gave me this
Right, but you still haven't said the contents of your letter (per the post below). It should be noted that your partial claim in 1124 was helpful, as you helped rule out the possibility of a redirect.In post 1340, alimdia wrote:[...]I said I didn't send a letter saying guilty. My receipent said they received my mail so...In post 1338, EspressoPatronum wrote:I agree with pk on this. This lynch feels important and people have information, but nobody wants to give enough information to help steer the lynch.In post 1335, eyestott wrote:Who’s doing the teeth pulling, pk?
- Egix just now confirmed the TARGETS but not the actions claimed by eyestott + the letter
- Eyestott won't reveal the full contents of the letter to protect the identity of the JoaT
- The JoaT hasn't revealed
- alim is a mailman who hasn't said what he sent
There's more information that people are holding, but the above is/may be relevant to the lynch.
Whether or not the holding of information today has been the correct play, trying to get said information definitely feels like pulling teeth.
[...]
In post 1124, alimdia wrote:I'm gonna do a partial claim, and redact some stuff because I don't want to give other info away 'freely'
I am an mailman. I sent a mail to Eve last night.The contents of the mail shall remain secret for now, but it definitely is NOT 'I'm a JOAT and I got a guilty on pisskop N1', so that rules out me being redirected to eyescott.
I did not send a mail to anyone else last night. Therefore, I'm struggling to understand how eyescott got a mail last night.
I also did not send mail on N1, Eve should understand why.
The conclusion is that the mailman is either scum or eyescott is just bs'ing the whole thing up.
Good pointIn post 1343, Eve wrote:i think people not coming forward with more information is probably indicative that this lynch is fine and nothing more needs to be said