Mafiascum.net

In post 1324, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1315, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 1301, Frozen Angel wrote:I even see it as a possibility that we have 3 scum in scorp andante and nero right now and it all make so much sense to me that I want to even cry

there's no way that we don't have at least 1, probably 2 scum just coasting in this game state

Could not agree anymore..

In post 1168, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 1159, the worst wrote:

In post 1157, fireisredsir wrote:imo if anything a lim on Nero would encourage there to be more wallposts

what's your read on nero independent of fa?

idk how to read him independent of FA since that's all he's done lately. i think that his responses have been better and more consistent than hers, and i mostly agree with his perspective so far on other things as well. that doesn't make him town but id lean that way. i also think that FA is very easy to sheep here and i am concerned about the people doing that without much thought. greeting especially looks bad to me

In post 1180, Andante wrote:

In post 1176, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 1174, Andante wrote:

In post 1171, Dwlee99 wrote:This wagon actually reeks wow

nahh good wagon. I TR the people on it

do you TR greeting and scorpious?

scorp isn't on it, and greeting seemed fine. I also agree with trusting in Frozen here. Frozen is very passionate about this read, and I think, since frozen has put in by far the most work here, I go with Frozen

In post 1295, Andante wrote:

In post 1290, fireisredsir wrote:feels more like she's forgetting what her thoughts and reads are supposed to be

ok no. I keep forgetting what my actual thoughts are cause yall asked me for a list, I wrote that down, gave that, and the way people ask for stuff, I just genuinely don't remember that stuff. Reads I make on my own time, I remember those. Like I don't tr Eyes AT ALL. Hockey's claim is so bad.. Scorp is also getting on their level. but look, none of my thoughts matter cause no one else is thinking that way, so why listen to me?

In post 1308, Andante wrote: How does 1234 mean I forget I TR nero?

you can vote TRs

... lol we're getting no where on this point.. just saying... I was referring to how we're going back to something I said 500 posts ago.... like how is that relevant?

In post 1328, the worst wrote:VOTE: scorpious this one excites me less ftr

In post 1332, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1328, the worst wrote:VOTE: scorpious this one excites me less ftr

what dioes this mean

In post 1334, Greeting wrote:What's the record for largest amount of posts on Day 1 in a Mini Normal? We might be heading towards that.

In post 1333, the worst wrote:

In post 1332, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1328, the worst wrote:VOTE: scorpious this one excites me less ftr

what dioes this mean

i voted scorp
and then said the scorp wagon doesn't excite me as much

In post 62, Nero Cain wrote:Nero Cain is here to vote scum but then not get listened to

In post 64, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 48, Andante wrote:

In post 47, 0verki11 wrote:ive been pretty busy today

Busy with maf plans so soon?

VOTE: 0verki11

this is dumb, back on hockey

vote:hockeyfan

In post 253, Nero Cain wrote:Scorps 203 is a bit dumb. It was a meaningless page 1 vote and you calling it out is stupid. There's nothing "bad" about it. It's null. Also complaining about his 157 was whack. It's not all that dissimilar from Andante's 161. I thought this post was overly nitpicky but decent q at the end. No wonder this guy got ran up in our last game.

In post 213, Scorpious wrote:

In post 207, Stephen A Smith wrote:

In post 40, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 31, Andante wrote:also I don't tr Hockey for realz 27,28 come from maf not town

why

this is a bad response

both these posts are kinda bad tbh

At first, I was like "yeah I agree with you" but upon further reflection...naw. Even though I think Hockey is scum both alignments will ask why they are being scum read. Maybe you could argue that Stephens isn't the greatest since asking for clarification on why they (Hockey) were being scum read is just...generic and not really "bad" but not great either.

In post 214, wavemode wrote:The reads did have reasoning behind them.

but didn't he only explain like one read though? Like I can get behind your reasoning for town reading the slot and I guess you could say that logic dictates that he did have reasoning to call those 5 slots scummy (unless you want to argue that he threw out 5 randos to see who bites) but I only remember him talking about Greeting but Ima reread that convo when I get done catching up.

now, where were you all those times I got ran up for not explaining my scumreads?

In post 219, Scorpious wrote:I dont think DW was pissed I think he genuinely was curious.

In post 74, Dwlee99 wrote:No your list sucks and so you die

sounds kinda angry there.

this was the 2nd post after an OMGUS/Venge vote. Where are you getting that DW was more curious than pissed?

In post 219, Scorpious wrote:I don’t think anyone should be taking anything AI out of that entire exchange based on the ridiculousness of it all.

I'll dedicate a longer post to this when I'm not as tired but I don't feel like it was really all that "ridiculous". I mean maybe I'm misinterpreting here when you, wave and Hockey say there's nothing AI there to mean its null behavior and you just can't decide what alignment(s) it comes from but its not like its a contentless fluffpost.

In post 1337, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1333, the worst wrote:

In post 1332, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1328, the worst wrote:VOTE: scorpious this one excites me less ftr

what dioes this mean

i voted scorp
and then said the scorp wagon doesn't excite me as much

seems odd for u to have both of these thoughts in the same post?

In post 1337, HockeyFan wrote:you voted a person, and then didnt like the wagon anymore within 5 words?

In post 1337, HockeyFan wrote:so A. why vote them B. who on the wagon do u not like

In post 1344, the worst wrote:i'll concede that obviously you're also looking at andante, but to be completely blunt, you're not really doing anything to advance that :p

In post 443, Greeting wrote:

In post 407, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 406, Greeting wrote:

Scorpious

is unusually enthusiastic about this game.

My gut tells me it's because of

Stephen A Smith

though.

Does them being enthusiastic about this game affect your read on them?

I thought the context of the post implied that I think it's NAI.

In post 445, Greeting wrote:I also don't see Scorpious as particularly scummy this game (referencing 363). It is, however, my gut read based on the fact that his scum game often tends to be unenthusiastic and he seems to be really into it this time. I'm not ruling out scum Scorpious, but I think there's more scummy slots than that.

In post 1345, Andante wrote:

In post 1344, the worst wrote:i'll concede that obviously you're also looking at andante, but to be completely blunt, you're not really doing anything to advance that :p

What? Hockey is looking at me?

In post 1346, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 443, Greeting wrote:

In post 407, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 406, Greeting wrote:

Scorpious

is unusually enthusiastic about this game.

My gut tells me it's because of

Stephen A Smith

though.

Does them being enthusiastic about this game affect your read on them?

I thought the context of the post implied that I think it's NAI.

In post 445, Greeting wrote:I also don't see Scorpious as particularly scummy this game (referencing 363). It is, however, my gut read based on the fact that his scum game often tends to be unenthusiastic and he seems to be really into it this time. I'm not ruling out scum Scorpious, but I think there's more scummy slots than that.

interesting. these are different reads, right after each other. he says it's NAI when he's questioned on it, but then when talking about it in a different context he has a gut read based on it. feels nervous