Mafiascum.net

↑ Ser Panda wrote:

↑ Teleporting Speed Hippos wrote:

No. Stop right there.

We are

NOT

abandoning a scumlynch on N just because Gooner isn't reading.
Get your votes back on N so I can hammer the fuck outta him.

OR tell me why scum would post without reading.

Swear to god wrathchild.

stop being annoying as fuck

Why the misrep?

As promised

@Mod: I thought I had a vote on MoS, if I don't then the above should be fine, if I do, , then

On top of the whole intent to hammer Defender thing, I really got bad vibes from his response to my question about reaction to the discrepancy between Pardoned and Dead Thor.

↑ Mastermind of Sin wrote:

↑ IceGuy wrote:WrathChild (7): Knight of Cydonia, Knight of Cydonia, vijay2vasandani, N, DoomYoshi, StrangerCoug, vijay2vasandani

This wagon makes me REALLY reconsider how I feel about WrathChild...he's probably town now.

I'd really like you to expand on this please. I don't care if you think I'm town or not, but I do care who you think is scummy on my wagon and why.

My first act as a proper player in this game is


====[]
[]====

FUCKING PARTYTIME

WrathChild (7): Knight of Cydonia, Knight of Cydonia, vijay2vasandani, N, DoomYoshi, StrangerCoug, vijay2vasandani
Mastermind of Sin (4): Axelrod, Gooner, Gooner, N
Gooner (5): Sir Bastion, Sir Bastion, DCLXVI, DoomYoshi, DoomYoshi
Knight of Cydonia (4): WrathChild, WrathChild, Nero Cain, Axelrod
StrangerCoug (3): Ser Panda, Quilford, guille2015
vijay2vasandani (2): Knight of Cydonia, Gooner
Mastermind of Sin (1): N

votes are currently not on a player.



Every player has votes.
With alive, it's to hammer.
There are votes in play, of which are frozen, leaving votes active.

Deadline is August 31st, noon CEST.





The defendants are and .

Everybody is anxious, waiting for the jail doors opening.

However, only the sheriff exits the building. Everybody else is carried out in a coffin.

votes are currently not on a player.

Every player has votes.
With alive, it's to hammer.
There are votes in play, of which are frozen, leaving votes active.

Deadline is September 21st, 11 a.m. CEST.

VOTE: StrangerCoug
VOTE: StrangerCoug
VOTE: Sir Bastion

Was on the jury, more on that in a bit.

Going to give a summary of the jury, which my "luck" put me on it again:

We were Axel, Nocmen, AVox, Quilford, Stranger, Bastion, and me. We judged N.

N's defense statement was really bad. He chose not to give reads, and said that his mistake was posting too much without thinking.'

Post-by-Post:

AVox votes Guilty. (L-3)
AVox claims that N's statement was AtE, and another bit of stuff I explained about his Defense.
Quilford forgets jury is randomized and votes Guilty. (L-2)
AVox tells him this.
Quilford Unvotes. (L-3)
AVox asks Quil if he thinks N is scum.
Quilford says he's not sure. He says that he thinks he and Sir Bastion are opposite alignments, or both town. He says he will vote anyway.
I vote guilty, giving a quick explanation why my vote would have been on him in the main game if I had any left. (L-2)
Bastion votes guilty, about his defense. (L-1)
Stranger thinks the group made the right choice, but was too quick to hammer.
Nocmen quickhammers. Although his post read town, the hammer was not good.

Based Solely on Jury:



Sir Bastion because of Quilford's idea, Nocmen because of his quickhammer.

Nocmen (1): D3f3nd3r

votes are currently not on a player.

Every player has votes.
With alive, it's to hammer.
There are votes in play, of which are frozen, leaving votes active.

Deadline is September 21st, 11 a.m. CEST.

VOTE: MOS
MOS

As for the thing yesterday, it was a reaction test. Trying to see who would try turning something totally unscummy (not fully reading the thread) into something scummy and to see who leapt on the bandwagon.

DoomYoshi leapt onto the bandwagon in a way which worries me.

VOTE: DoomYoshi

LOL

Nice try bro


What do you mean "because of Quilford's idea"?
Why are you voting Nocmen? Haven't we already gone over why this is a bad idea?


Fully claim your PR and results or die.

Also willing to vote: v2v, WC.

↑ Gooner wrote:As for the thing yesterday, it was a reaction test. Trying to see who would try turning something totally unscummy (not fully reading the thread) into something scummy and to see who leapt on the bandwagon.

Can you please explain this better.

V/LA until Tuesday evening.

VOTE: Axelrod x2
VOTE: Defender

↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:VOTE: Axelrod x2
VOTE: Defender

Care to explain these, or just going to lurk more and contribute almost as little as Shadow did?

BTW, who got the Executioner deal?

StrangerCoug (2): Quilford, Quilford
Sir Bastion (2): Quilford, D3f3nd3r
Mastermind of Sin (2): Gooner, Gooner
Quilford (2): Mastermind of Sin, Mastermind of Sin
D3f3nd3r (2): AurorusVox, vijay2vasandani
Nocmen (1): D3f3nd3r
DoomYoshi (1): Gooner
Gooner (1): AurorusVox

votes are currently not on a player.

Every player has votes.
With alive, it's to hammer.
There are votes in play, of which are frozen, leaving votes active.

Deadline is September 21st, 11 a.m. CEST.

@AVox

↑ D3f3nd3r wrote:
Quilford says he's not sure. He says that he thinks he and Sir Bastion are opposite alignments, or both town. He says he will vote anyway.

Nocmen quickhammers. Although his post read town, the hammer was not good.

You mean, he said opposite alignments or both scum, right?
Why do you think N and SB are of opposite alignments?

...


You know this is getting really repetitive and I really want to know why now.


Quilford has voted me once twice three times during this game and has never followed up on any of them.

I dont understand why you keep voting for me and accusing me of scum when you have no conviction to stand behind your votes. You never follow up on your accusations, when I have defended myself or even when the mod pulls your vote due to technical error. Which is incredibly odd if not downright suspicious

and then the kicker that has me really wondering is that you use the jury on N as a grounds to go for me again over the actually person we are meant to be considering the defendants case. I might think you have some issue with me personally.

I actually want you to stand by your guns this time, actually put forward a case for me being scum cause you seem jacksure of it enough to keep taking pot shots at me and then not following them up when it's clear no one else in the game is interested. Look you have defender with you this time so perhaps you will actually do something.

↑ D3f3nd3r wrote:Going to give a summary of the jury, which my "luck" put me on it again:

We were Axel, Nocmen, AVox, Quilford, Stranger, Bastion, and me. We judged N.

N's defense statement was really bad. He chose not to give reads, and said that his mistake was posting too much without thinking.'

Post-by-Post:

AVox votes Guilty. (L-3)
AVox claims that N's statement was AtE, and another bit of stuff I explained about his Defense.
Quilford forgets jury is randomized and votes Guilty. (L-2)
AVox tells him this.
Quilford Unvotes. (L-3)
AVox asks Quil if he thinks N is scum.

Quilford says he's not sure. He says that he thinks he and Sir Bastion are opposite alignments, or both town. He says he will vote anyway.

I vote guilty, giving a quick explanation why my vote would have been on him in the main game if I had any left. (L-2)
Bastion votes guilty, about his defense. (L-1)
Stranger thinks the group made the right choice, but was too quick to hammer.
Nocmen quickhammers. Although his post read town, the hammer was not good.

Based Solely on Jury:

VOTE: Sir Bastion, Nocmen

Sir Bastion because of Quilford's idea, Nocmen because of his quickhammer.

Bolded reads as scum who knew exactly how N would flip. Interesting is the fact that he said he would vote anyway... but never actually did. Smells like someone knew what was coming and wanted to be able to point fingers.

pending an answer to this question: why were you so sure that N and Bastion were/are opposite alignments, and why didn't you vote for N after putting your vote on, removing it and then stating you would vote N guilty?