Page 55 of 123

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 6:32 pm
by Darthe
Hey, I just got back to this and saw the death. Ferret comes out of this looking blindsided and I am probably going to place a vote there (after an ISO in the morning, I'll do a case to show you all if I find stuff). Alternatively Svet has looked to gain a lot of quick town credit based on... knowing the canon? I can't figure out if his stream of consciousness is just that or is jumping on easy brownie points. Gotta agree with Desperado about Krab but that slot is funky in general imo and past that I will have more to say tomorrow. Happy Mothers Day to those of you who are stateside.

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 7:33 pm
by Svenskt Stål
In post 1347, Amethyst Actor wrote:Ya'll should vote Sven, that post I quoted in that vote post shows him slipping. He stated that he knew that the game was multi-ball because there couldn't be a team of three against a town of 18. insinuating that he knew how many people were on the scum team.
I did not insinuate. I KNEW, that the scum team had 3 players. A few other non scum players did aswell, its called logic.

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 7:33 pm
by Svenskt Stål
In post 1348, Amethyst Actor wrote:and I'll keep on whining about Krabs not being lynched until I see good reason to believe otherwise just as I do for alot of my scumspects
Nobody will listen to you and you will only look scummier.

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 8:05 pm
by petapan
i legit don't have time to fully keep up right now so i'm going to be putting myself on
V/LA until Wednesday, May 15

In post 1146, RATEDR wrote:heya, petapan. First of all, are you Peta or Reggin? Hard to keep track, especially with your John Cena gimmick (which I'm guessing means you're Reggin)

Also, what are your thoughts on Raven and GoodCopBadCop? You have briefly touched on those two but I'd like to know what you think of them a little more in depth.

-Grazie
the latter

dunno and whoops i was leaning town on him not going to lie to try and save face
In post 1241, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really understand this part.

Why would you think it was scummy of Despo to ask Sven to claim?

Why is he no longer scummy for asking GCBC to claim after the fake daykill?
the former is rolefishing (actual rolefishing not contrived horsecrap people try to make into a scumtell), where with the latter it's eh, asking a dayvig to out their role

but given the fact we just had a scum daykill go through i'm not sure anymore

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 10:36 pm
by xMALCOLMx
[Kise]
In post 1346, Skullduggery wrote:Or, more likely:

15 Town
3 Shield Mafia (Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins, Roman Reigns)
3 Heyman Mafia (Paul Heyman, Brock Lesnar, CM Punk)

zomg setup speculation

A commendable attempt to keep a lid on the identity of your team, though.
I laughed :oops:

That was Nacho earlier. I explained who Paul Heyman was and who would be partnered with him as 2nd mafia team members.

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 10:49 pm
by ArcAngel9
am out till Monday morning.
will catch up on Monday.. sorry :(

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 10:52 pm
by The Goat
My level of irritation with this game is to the point that I'm tunneling on certain people and not behaving pro-town. Gonna step back and reread from the beginning.

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 11:29 pm
by Doctor C Niall DeMencha
I need to be more active.

@Malcolm: top three players you'd lynch?
@Rate: explain why I'm scum and then put your vote where your mouth is.

Skull is playing like his town meta.
By the way, @whoever said I was one-way sniping, 100% right. I'm convinced Krabs slot is scum and Mutt has done nothing to dissipate this. It's worrying how fast the wagon collapsed -people on it must not have believed in it. Will re-read.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 12:16 am
by Svenskt Stål
In post 1355, ArcAngel9 wrote:am out till Monday morning.
will catch up on Monday.. sorry :(
Allright, monday it is... it better be good because I kinda want you dead.
In post 1356, The Goat wrote:My level of irritation with this game is to the point that I'm tunneling on certain people and not behaving pro-town. Gonna step back and reread from the beginning.
When can I expect a post on this reread?
In post 1357, Doctor C Niall DeMencha wrote:I need to be more active.

@Malcolm: top three players you'd lynch?
@Rate: explain why I'm scum and then put your vote where your mouth is.

Skull is playing like his town meta.
By the way, @whoever said I was one-way sniping, 100% right. I'm convinced Krabs slot is scum and Mutt has done nothing to dissipate this. It's worrying how fast the wagon collapsed -people on it must not have believed in it. Will re-read.
Will you be more active?
What is skulls town meta?
Why is the collapse of krabs wagon (which had one anti town player atleast in it) worrying?

C Niall is getting close to top tier suspect.
AA being AA
Goat talking big, will hopefully deliver.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 12:18 am
by Svenskt Stål
Can krabs/mutley be scum? sure.

Do I think he is the best lynch? hell to the no.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 12:39 am
by Svenskt Stål
I am just so happy that the scum took down gcbc, ubermegalol.

What did it get us?

[x] took out a suspicious player
[x] took out a anti town power role
[x] made people be towny and interracting
[ ] got town buthurt

Thanks scum.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 1:28 am
by ferretlover
Was #1360 partially sarcastic?

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 2:01 am
by Svenskt Stål
No, I am thankfull for that kill.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 2:35 am
by Svenskt Stål
And this is retarded but I will say it anyway.

The argument that scum was affraid of day vig gcbc holds more true if I am scum, like I would have a reason to kill him because if I belived he was dayvig i would also belive that he might be coming for me.

So whatever... thats a scum point to me.

What happened thou is probably stated by skulls, scum was just affraid or thought there was value in killing gcbc. I dont know how right gcbc was on his reads, but i tend to think that scum didnt care and just hoped to net a power role.

If I was scum I would in this instance have killed gcbc I think... I would have had reasons for it.

But I think overall that skill kill was horrible and just a gift to the village.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 2:39 am
by Svenskt Stål
Like... if I am scum and i know that player x is a town vig I dont auto kill him, I see where his reads are at because if he is way off then that will probably just be added town kills.


Dont know where I am going with this, but I guess its better that I bring it up than some other.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 3:15 am
by Ravenpaw
Urgh so much to catch up on.
Good to know we now have 2 mafias we're dealing with. It's weird that the Shield chose the Cops, they were pinging a lot of radars and had a good chance of being lynched. Wifom I guess.
In post 1208, Mutleyddmc wrote:Can people stop saying krabs is their scum read. I've replaced him now so I am your scumread
Why did this comment make me laugh so much?
...I guess we just enjoy talking about Krabs.
In post 1346, Skullduggery wrote: Uh...thanks, I guess. You do realize that my read on Krab/Mutley hasn't changed, though, right? It's just that the prospect of convincing people to lynch that slot and building that wagon back up from scratch sounds only slightly less unappealing than sticking a potato peeler up my nose and turning it counter-clockwise.
This comment also gave me a good laugh. It's so very true.
In post 1347, Amethyst Actor wrote:Ya'll should vote Sven, that post I quoted in that vote post shows him slipping. He stated that he knew that the game was multi-ball because there couldn't be a team of three against a town of 18. insinuating that he knew how many people were on the scum team.
Nah, I think he's very obvious town.

Vote: Mutleydd


Still also up for a Rated R lynch ftr.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 3:28 am
by Svenskt Stål
Raven we have 3 scum to deal with... and probably 2 neutrals/second scum faction.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 3:31 am
by Ravenpaw
What does neutral mean here?

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 3:50 am
by Svenskt Stål
It means that they are a faction (the heymans) that is neither scum nor town.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 3:58 am
by Nero Cain
heymans are scum.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 4:07 am
by Svenskt Stål
heymans are neutrals.

discussion has ended.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 4:14 am
by Svenskt Stål
this might seem like semantics(is that the word for it?) but it fills a function in that we seperate the groups. This is important because these groups act without the knowledge of eachother.

I will not stand for both of them being grouped as "scum". Thats is anti town.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 4:16 am
by Fuzzyman
Svenskt Stål wrote:heymans are neutrals.

discussion has ended.
What is the town motivation for saying this? And you're so wrong it hurts.

P-Edit: Then just call them Heymans and Shield, and say which you're hunting for when you post. It's not hard. It's not anti-town. That would actually be you right this instant.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 4:30 am
by Nero Cain
In post 1372, Fuzzyman wrote:and say which you're hunting for when you post
Why would town do that?

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 4:30 am
by Ravenpaw
Hmm, Shield or Heyman people, they're both enemies to me either way.
Can neutrals do night kills like scum?