Page 55 of 237

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:09 pm
by Varsoon
In post 1348, bubbajack8 wrote:
In post 1345, ActionDan wrote:I see Varsoon is still voting Bulba even though they both claimed early.

weak sauce
Varsoon STILL hasn't answered my question. And he completely avoided it. Makes me think he's scum.
What is your question? I missed it. Q_Q

I am also glad to come back and see GCBC still being a total Rainbow Wizard.

VOTE: GCBC

Keep strawman'ing me bro. It'll work one day, Gandalf the Gay.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:09 pm
by YuniChikako
*siiigggghhh*
Prod dodge.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:53 pm
by bubbajack8
I QUOTED IT FOR YOU VARSOON. YOU SCUM ASS.

VOTE: Varsoon

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:56 pm
by bubbajack8
In post 1309, bubbajack8 wrote:Not liking Varsoon's response to my posts.
In post 1201, bubbajack8 wrote:but Varsoon; What's your character name hmmm?
In post 1309, bubbajack8 wrote:Not liking Varsoon's response to my posts.
In post 1201, bubbajack8 wrote:but Varsoon; What's your character name hmmm?
In post 1309, bubbajack8 wrote:Not liking Varsoon's response to my posts.
In post 1201, bubbajack8 wrote:but Varsoon; What's your character name hmmm?
In post 1309, bubbajack8 wrote:Not liking Varsoon's response to my posts.
In post 1201, bubbajack8 wrote:but Varsoon; What's your character name hmmm?
In post 1309, bubbajack8 wrote:Not liking Varsoon's response to my posts.
In post 1201, bubbajack8 wrote:but Varsoon; What's your character name hmmm?

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:26 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
A man suddenly gets feels like he needs a long blistering my hot shower...

In post 897, YuniChikako wrote:
In post 790, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:
In post 769, YuniChikako wrote:No, I'm liking Kagami.
Why do you think Kagami is town?
Because she hasn't done anything that would give people a scum read on her (well, none than I can find), and all this suspicion she's getting is helping me to get reads on other people. Maybe I wouldn't quite vote Rememberance, but at least she gave some decent reasoning. For now, I don't see anything scummy about her.

And no, before someone says it, I know someone will, I'm not buddying her. Kagami was one of the few things I found in the three hours I had that I thought really needed some fixing.
---

@Kazekirimaru I was going through your ISO and I found, as one of your reasons for seeing Kagami leaning towards scum, was that it took so long for her to "start up". You've looked town to me so far, but I'm curious as to why that would influence your read in the slightest bit. Especially with the beginning-of-the-game craziness.
---
I really don't like one (or two?) of the people posting with Lush Life, but it's probably coming from town. In my experience, if a person
really
gets on your nerves
that
badly, they're probably town. It's unlikely someone would post like that as scum.
---
In post 826, zMuffinMan wrote:also, tsukasa could be scum. i briefly skimmed through that giant wall a few pages back and didn't like anything i saw
What, exactly, did you not like?
---
In post 822, zMuffinMan wrote:i really dislike the pbpa bubba did in #750. there's so little analysis there; it reads like hollow commentary
I don't know about that- it was annoying to read, but it certainly moved things along. Besides, there wasn't much to comment on at the time. You have to make use of what you have.
---
In post 840, zMuffinMan wrote:[quote="tsukasa"
because there's no actual content there. like none, whatsoever. it's a huge wall designed to look like you're doing something when you're not doing anything at all, really. and all the questions you were asking were meaningless. plus the tone of all your commentary feels really off to me
I was thinking similarly. It seemed rather innocent at first, but now she's kind of pushing the whole "Why do you hate me/Why did you forget me/Don't hate me" thing. As if it's somehow an excuse. Though, I wouldn't say there's no content at all. It could be better, yes, but she has been doing a little here and there.
---
In post 883, Varsoon wrote:@Mod: I don't mind posting gimmicks. I think it's a part of playing the game. :D

@Kaze: Or we could be scum together, fufufu. Honestly, if you're scum and you work with me, it'll expose you, so I could see your hesitance to not do so. :D
You think Bubba is scum? So do I. So does the wagon forming on him. Let's put votes there and let a better mouthpiece (looking at you, LushLife) do the talking.

VOTE: Bubba
Nope nope nope nope nope. I want reasons. This all very much looks like buddying and trying to get some good light. Nope nope nope. I agree with you on the wagon looking scum, though.
---
In post 893, Amaranth wrote:VOTE: Pieguyn
I wish you people would give some reasons before you voted.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:33 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
And rereading Kaze lets a man. Know he would probably be better off with no skin at all

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:59 pm
by Kazekirimaru
In post 1355, Jaqen Hghar wrote:And rereading Kaze lets a man. Know he would probably be better off with no skin at all
I like my skin. It helps me live. I don't desire to go to a dermatologist and get all doctored up from lack of skin.

Anyway, would a man explain what he means? Does a man have a problem with me?

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:03 pm
by Varsoon
I said it in my claim, Bubba.
Tewi Inabi.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:30 pm
by The Chamber of Kittens
I'm mostly caught up, skimmed some of the more recent stuff. Mala is still behind but we've still talked.
Vote Bubba


We think its highly unlikely that there is both a 1-shot bomb and a 1-shot redirector. Both are powerful volatile roles. Including both makes the setup far too swingy.
Evaluating their play and not the claims, I've found both to be pretty independently scummy. But why would someone actually claim a bomb like that? They wouldn't. So we think thats the lie between the 2.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:34 pm
by Kise
this 21 player tho

and im isoing the mod and dont see why we have 2 claims when no one was near l-1

is this game fun now or is there stil drama? I hope you guys playing nice now.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:43 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
Can we lynch Kise slot after?

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:46 pm
by GoodCop_BadCop
In post 1350, Varsoon wrote:Keep strawman'ing me bro. It'll work one day, Gandalf the Gay.
Keep using big words you actually don't know the definition of. One day it might get you a job, but not for long.

Kaze, it referrs to Varsoon's consistent contradictions.

~GC

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:03 pm
by bubbajack8
In post 1357, Varsoon wrote:I said it in my claim, Bubba.
Tewi Inabi.
Did I miss it? And it's spelled Inaba, according to Google.
In post 1110, Varsoon wrote: I'm one-shot redirector, Tewi Inabi, of the Good Girls.
Wow I'm a complete dumbass.

UNVOTE:

White Rabbit of good fortune... Interesting
In post 1358, The Chamber of Kittens wrote: But why would someone actually claim a bomb like that? They wouldn't.
Add to post upon flip

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:07 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
Spoiler:
In post 307, Lush Life wrote:VOTE: morph
In post 323, Lush Life wrote:
In post 318, bubbajack8 wrote:I also remember someone quoting it with earlier in the post saying Flavor has no aspect. So I had no clue as well.
also this argument would be utterly retarded if I was town reading you
In post 324, morph the cat wrote:So mollie, do you have any idea how much of a total bitch you are to ffery sometimes? She's townreading you but for fuck's sake girl; your antagonistic snipes at her in game after game are creating a toxic wasteland. Perhaps you think it's the best way for you to read her, but all you're achieving is pissing her off and ensuring I'm playing alone the next few IRL days.
In post 331, morph the cat wrote:
In post 329, Kazekirimaru wrote:
I'm confused as to the source of this tension.
Me too bro. Some shit from their mutual back history that they don't talk about. It happens pretty much every game ffery and mollie are in together. Either way though, I'm attached to ffery so I get to deal with it.
Didn't understand the tension as well until Cabd brought up the second part. It's all assumption on what was going on in their exchange then. But the lack of fftery after that was on you.


You do this thing where you disregard everything a person says and borderline insult/provoke them for not having the same POV or information that you think you have and quite frankly it's annoying. Your general reaction to those that disagree with you is "k. whatevs ur scum"

Not really a fan of attempting to interact with you again. But I have to.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:08 pm
by bubbajack8
Policy lynch Lush so we don't have to interact with them? :wink:

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:09 pm
by Kazekirimaru
Is that alignment indicative though, Kat?

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:16 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
In post 1365, Kazekirimaru wrote:Is that alignment indicative though, Kat?
You know, given the circumstances of the exchange between them and Cabd's reaction I understand where it comes from. The mad might be unwarranted but it was there and frlt pretty damn genuine to me. Hey, if it were some giant ruse, props to them but I can't really just ignore that.

I've been townreading both for some time now so I guess for me it is.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:26 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
In post 1358, The Chamber of Kittens wrote:I'm mostly caught up, skimmed some of the more recent stuff. Mala is still behind but we've still talked.
Vote Bubba


We think its highly unlikely that there is both a 1-shot bomb and a 1-shot redirector. Both are powerful volatile roles. Including both makes the setup far too swingy.
Evaluating their play and not the claims, I've found both to be pretty independently scummy. But why would someone actually claim a bomb like that? They wouldn't. So we think thats the lie between the 2.
Did you forget the IC?

Also why would they not claim, jw.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:35 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
Bubba* mot Varsoon. Varsoon's claim was p. dumb and uncalled for at all.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:42 pm
by Varsoon
GCBC, I actually do have a job for a college where I teach English--so, it is literally my job. Literally.
Just because your intelligence is insulted doesn't mean everyone who used uncommon or 'big' words don't know them either.
:P

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:43 pm
by Kise
In post 1360, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:Can we lynch Kise slot after?
stop

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:44 pm
by Varsoon
But, yeah, stop making this a pissing match of intent, agency, and intelligence--what's at stake here is that I've called you out for your play. You should focus a lot more on that, instead of insulting the people who've called you out. :D

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:45 pm
by Kazekirimaru
If we could continue on with either a bubba or pie lynch that'd be fantastic.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:51 pm
by GoodCop_BadCop
Then put up or shut up professor.

~GC

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:59 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 1363, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 307, Lush Life wrote:VOTE: morph
In post 323, Lush Life wrote:
In post 318, bubbajack8 wrote:I also remember someone quoting it with earlier in the post saying Flavor has no aspect. So I had no clue as well.
also this argument would be utterly retarded if I was town reading you
In post 324, morph the cat wrote:So mollie, do you have any idea how much of a total bitch you are to ffery sometimes? She's townreading you but for fuck's sake girl; your antagonistic snipes at her in game after game are creating a toxic wasteland. Perhaps you think it's the best way for you to read her, but all you're achieving is pissing her off and ensuring I'm playing alone the next few IRL days.
In post 331, morph the cat wrote:
In post 329, Kazekirimaru wrote:
I'm confused as to the source of this tension.
Me too bro. Some shit from their mutual back history that they don't talk about. It happens pretty much every game ffery and mollie are in together. Either way though, I'm attached to ffery so I get to deal with it.
Didn't understand the tension as well until Cabd brought up the second part. It's all assumption on what was going on in their exchange then. But the lack of fftery after that was on you.


You do this thing where you disregard everything a person says and borderline insult/provoke them for not having the same POV or information that you think you have and quite frankly it's annoying. Your general reaction to those that disagree with you is "k. whatevs ur scum"

Not really a fan of attempting to interact with you again. But I have to.
A man lols! A girl quotes three heads and admonishes Lady Lush for all!