Mafiascum.net

In post 499, Aegor wrote:

In post 493, Antihero wrote:i'm serious.

you don't get to join a game knowing full well there are hydras and then policy lynch.

we were first. replace out.

Your death is not mandated by your nature as a hydra.

In post 504, Aegor wrote:I am not pushing for a policy lynch; that is your own incorrect inference.

"I want to lynch you for 'reasons.' This is not a policy lynch."

In post 511, Aegor wrote:

In post 502, TiphaineDeath wrote:Alright Aegor I'll bite, why do you think Necro is scummy over Xay and Dry?

I think that the Necro hydra is more deserving of a lynch; that does not mean that I find it more scummy necessarily. I can believe player 1 is scummier than player 2 but still advocate for 2's lynch based on other factors, e.g. information generated by the lynch, general effect on the game, influence 2 has on other players, etc.

The hydra's posts in general are irrational, devoid of content, full of vague feelings, and extremely aggressive and defensive. One can verify this easily through an ISO.

Also why are Xay and dry scummy, in your own words.

I addressed dry in a post; ISO me and ask me again if you have questions or could not find my explanation.

Xay is gut. TBH, part of that is others' suspicions; had they not been expressed, I may not be subconsciously seeking some reason to find Xay's posts scummy. That read is definitely subject to change/solidification.

Necro is stated here as not being an alignment motivated lynch. This is by definition a policy lynch. There is no reason for Aegor to be pushing a policy lynch and refusing to call it as such. If he would have been honest about it, I would have taken this as a minor towntell. As it is, it shows a disturbing preoccupation with his own image in the thread that belongs to scum.

In post 555, Aegor wrote:

In post 524, Antihero wrote: OK,

before

we went down the rabbit hole of bullshit with SKOT and Fear in the last few pages, where did any of this happen?

i'm going to completely disengage from aegor before i really do say something to him that gets me banned.

Chillax, man. You are more than welcome to point me in the direction of your probing scumhunting. I would expect a bountiful supply given the percentage of this thread that consists of your hydra's spam.

In post 543, Antihero wrote:let me let you all in on something.

yes, i'm cranky. yes, i'm defensive. you know why? because the primary thing against us has been "no content" which is such a shitty accusation given our posting. and the most aggravating thing is that nobody is actually attempting to go to our posting and say "hey, these posts [link], [link], and [link] right here are scummy and you guys are scumfucks." the accusations have largely been "you guys suck, you're not posting content, you get in bad arguments. vote: necro" and that's it (see: fear's vote in post 390)

since there's no real substance, there's no argument to be made. the only thing i can do is go "nuh uh". and then everyone comes into the thread and wonders

why

my blood pressure shoots through the roof whenever i post in this thread.

Again, the easy counter is by pointing to the actual substance your hydra has provided. Maybe I missed it: although I have read the thread, there is a large amount of content produced each 20 mins, it seems.

Hypocrisy at its finest. I stand by hypocrisy in scumhunting as a scumtell. Further, he's not putting forward any reasons that mastinhero is a scumslot, and addresses them as if they're town, but is still voting them.

In post 736, Aegor wrote:Is anyone strongly townreading Dry-Fit?

This type of post always pings my scumdar pretty hard. This is sounding out support for a lynch without committing to it. He's leaving his options open, not commiting to anything.

In post 744, Aegor wrote:

In post 740, Dry-fit wrote:Not liking Aegor's push on me. He ust says my posts are bad but

doesn't give any reason to think they're scum motivated

.

Motivation is not always relevant to whether something is scummy.

This is insane. Scumhunting is all about motivation. The difference between scum and town is motivation. Aegor here is slipping and demonstrating that he's not scumhunting, but trying to portray things as scummy.

In post 784, Aegor wrote:

In post 776, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:I am also completely aware of the fact that, Mastin's stance on Talah is strong enough so that, arguing against it is probably futile, leaving her alive long enough will pretty much be a huge distraction to mastin, and him flipping town would probably serve as a strong enough catalyst in making a hard-reset D2 which will probably make mastin that much more useful as town

I hope you are aware of how terrible this reasoning is. First, it assumes that mastin is town. Second, you are essentially advocating lynching a player who may be town so that another obsessive player may be useful in the future. Really?

Hypocrisy on the PL front. Further, Aegor is expressing that he doesn't see Shiny's purpose here, but he also doesn't follow through. There's no evolution of reads from this. He doesn't push Shiny to figure out why they're thinking the way they are. He clearly has an opportunity to push and develop reads here, and he doesn't even try.

In post 829, Aegor wrote:

In post 812, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:Uhh... no? I take it you aren't a very guts/emotive/relationship type of player, because if you were you would know the difficulty behind making reads on players with said relationship, and how unlikely it is for a read on them to be change

Translation into English please?

VOTE: Necro if I am not already.

There is no reason here for SH's post to solidify his Necro read. He is already voting Necro, but clearly is not paying enough attention to his only tool in scumhunting to be able to know that he's voting for the lynch he's been pushing literally all day. He also continues to fail to give a good reason for his vote.

In post 837, Aegor wrote:Non-voters, (please) vote. No one is in danger of a lynch, so there really is no reason not to be voting someone.

An empty call to action to the town. This is scum pretending to contribute.

In post 1009, Aegor wrote:VOTE: MafiaSSK

In post 1011, Aegor wrote:VOTE: Xayzeck

In post 1012, Aegor wrote:

Here he is putting his vote wherever the fuck he thinks is more likely than his own lynch. He's not looking for scum, he's looking to live. This is not a town posting style.

In post 1316, Aegor wrote:VOTE: Jordan

The Aegor haters still have three days to mobilize.

And here, where he jumps onto us again, he still manages to show that his priority and thoughts are still revolving around himself. Where town is looking around them for scum, Aegor is looking at himself and saying "How can I not get lynched today?"