Mafiascum.net

In post 153, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 151, Robbnva wrote:

In post 149, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 147, Creature wrote:More votes on Smithereens would be good.

are you trying to start a wagon or just get more out of them? (seeing as they only have 2 posts and i frankly can't get enough from that to place a legitimate vote)

agree with this somewhat, however the post he made about creature I agreed with so I don't see what creature's issue is unless it's omgus.

yeah i didn't have a problem with Smithereens' thought on creature early. Creature did try to make a case on smithereens though so let me go back and read it

In post 155, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 130, Creature wrote:

In post 60, Smithereens wrote:First Thoughts: 'Damn 3 pages already this game is hella active'
*reads the game*
3 people engaged in small chat... :\


VOTE: Creature
Somewhat serious vote, not entirely RVS. There's absolutely no way you're getting a town read from the very first post a person makes in the game. If you could I'd just copy/paste that post everywhere I went as scum and you'd be none the wiser. Possible that Creature is buddying, I don't like how he talks about 'early town activity' or some shit like that as if he's trying to seem a part of it.

This post fits perfectly a scum being opportunistic. Robbnva is having problems with early townreads, so what would stop scum from supporting him and make stupid lynches?

if you're arguing that scum is supporting him when he's having trouble with early reads, that would make scum exposed and we could just look at people jumping onto wagons with no real information. also, they made a legitimate argument given how early we were in the game when they posted this.
And what would stop them from making stupid lynches? hopefully everyone else needing information before blindly jumping on wagons. i dunno man, your point feels forced

In post 156, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 154, Robbnva wrote:He did? Oh I missed that post somehow. I'll have to read it later

i didn't like the case he made

In post 1334, Creature wrote:

In post 11, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 5, Eggman wrote:Hello, everyone! General question: what's your favorite dessert?
VOTE: Creature (I won't lurk this time if you don't.)

I really like brownie bottom pie with vanilla ice cream and whipped cream

Bad.

In post 168, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 157, Dwlee99 wrote:I think the point creature is making is that scum were taking advantage of robbnva having issues with people having town reads and using it as an excuse to try to push a lynch through. (Which is a decent argument imo)

That makes more sense i was misunderstanding what creature originally meant by "problems with townreads". Either way I'm not sure that was Smithereens trying to jump on and push for a lynch. iirc creature didn't even have a vote on him that wasn't from rvs and robb didn't place a vote on him during that squabble. if there were more votes on creature i could see it as scum pushing for a lynch but being the first legitimate vote on creature doesn't convince me fully.
I would like to see what Smith has to say though considering we're now days in and they've only posted twice.

In post 1339, Creature wrote:^ I think mafia killed Dwlee99 because:

- SK would see Robbnva more as a threat to him rather than mafia who's just eliminating strong town reads and keeping WIFOM in the game.

- I don't think a vigilante would shoot Dwlee99, some showed paranoia but I don't see someone doing a hero vig here.

In post 175, Smithereens wrote:

In post 130, Creature wrote:

In post 60, Smithereens wrote:First Thoughts: 'Damn 3 pages already this game is hella active'
*reads the game*
3 people engaged in small chat... :\


VOTE: Creature
Somewhat serious vote, not entirely RVS. There's absolutely no way you're getting a town read from the very first post a person makes in the game. If you could I'd just copy/paste that post everywhere I went as scum and you'd be none the wiser. Possible that Creature is buddying, I don't like how he talks about 'early town activity' or some shit like that as if he's trying to seem a part of it.

This post fits perfectly a scum being opportunistic. Robbnva is having problems with early townreads, so what would stop scum from supporting him and make stupid lynches?

I believe this was the first non RVS vote of the game. How informed do you want it to be...? Read it in context please.

In post 1344, Creature wrote:

In post 117, F-oh-ex wrote:

In post 108, Robbnva wrote:

In post 105, F-oh-ex wrote:Aaaaaand they're mostly shitposting, w-w-wow.

Not sure how you can say it's mostly shit posting. Lots of game discussion has taken place in the past 2/3 pages.
What's your opinion on these discussions? The serious votes on me, the serious vote on creature, the refusal to give opinions on those 2 things by atm?

Any thoughts at all?

Let me read it 2-3 times and I'll present my opinion. I'd rather not form a serious opinion on spot after one read if I weren't there while the discussion was happening at all. When I am forced to catch up (and I often am due to time zones), I prefer to take a few horus to read everything carefully a few times.

"I'd rather not form a serious opinion on spot after one read" Scum
"When I am forced to catch up" Town

In post 177, Smithereens wrote:

In post 176, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 175, Smithereens wrote:I believe this was the first non RVS vote of the game.

well you're wrong

I'm not. However you missed my point, Creature reacted really poorly to a vote that was justified for that point in the game. With more material I wouldn't say that I should keep my vote there, however I didn't expect Creature to feel so threatened by it. A hit maybe? That would be damned interesting, however I'd preferably like to hear what he says for himself before we discuss meta on reactions vs innocuous posts. Sufficient to say that there's plenty to investigate here.

In post 1347, Creature wrote:

In post 148, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 128, stelo wrote:VOTE: Dragon

ayyeee he's here

Why am I getting the feeling Dragon overreacts when stelo/petroleumjelly mentions him?

In post 1349, Creature wrote:

In post 150, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 127, Smithereens wrote:I'll give Dwlee benefit of doubt and assume he's being antagonistic for the sake of arguments/activity. Not an ideal tact imo given all the activity, so take the hint.

he's gonna play that way regardless of what you say to him

Huh what?

In post 234, atm487 wrote:OK listen, so I have been inactive lately because I have had alot on my mind and some stuff happened, but listen. I know for a fact creature is town, his posts are very revealing and if he's playing scum, he very good, if not, then he is very good at town too, rooting out the obvious people that have been active, for now, I would like to re-review all the posts and wait a little before voting, because many of us have been active and I am having a hard time deciding who to vote for, my apologies

In post 235, atm487 wrote:personally, I just skimmed everything except stuff I was mentioned in, so I'll try to go over this later

In post 1358, Creature wrote:Robbnva looks more likely to screw the SK than Dwlee99 does, while mafia don't have to worry so much about Robbnva.

In post 1359, Creature wrote:Nvm, I think Robbnva got widely town read at the end of D1.