Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:29 am
VOTE: Buj
Follow me!
Page 55 of 152
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:30 am
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:32 am
To note: from 31 in my iso onwards I'm talking funny because a post restriction stopped me using the letter 'e'.
I will vote Buj today if people aren't happy with Moz.
I will vote Buj today if people aren't happy with Moz.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:33 am
unhappy with moz
im busy sorting bu rn
im busy sorting bu rn
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:38 am
this is the real deal. say meep and sheep me, sheep.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:43 am
149 Is where I first brought up Moz hadn’t played any games town-Hop. This was in response to 114 where he’d claimed to have played with town-Hop.In post 149, Hopkirk wrote:@Kat: Haven't caught up yet. Posting as I read.
I wonder why nobody’s really commented on me/NM. I like NM too.
I disagree with all three of these points.In post 114, mozamis wrote:and anHopkirk.
Played with twice when he was town and both times he was very active, proactive. it's early days but so far he has been lightweight.
Unless you're counting really old games (which either don't exist, or I've forgotten), we've only played one (completed) game together. I was third party playing protown and was more active because I had a succesful game breaking strategy that I needed to impliment. That required more words.
I disagree I didn't do anything in my first few posts. I got the UC wagon started which got us out of RVS and that/reactions to that are the cause of all the current wagons.
Also, I was the last post in thread as of when I went to sleep last night. I'm GMT.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:46 am
Since nobody else corrected Moz on this: Doyou isn't a replacement. It's UC playing under a different name.In post 1333, mozamis wrote:Doyou is a replacement, and time is ticking by. We lynch tonight.In post 1313, Rem wrote:Hammering before we get a replacement helps scum so lets not do that
We have so much info for day 1 - th eamount of content is huge! We are good fro alynch.
p:edit - shit, have i missed that? has someone replaced in?
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:54 am
In post 1329, Katyusha wrote:also this implies monkey town + im wondering how you would be able to differentiate between the two hereIn post 1327, Flubbernugget wrote:Thinking about monkey's suspicions of you buddying him, you might just be coming from weird angles to grab a hold of the game state instead of scum hunt.
help me out a little?
I've been easing up on monkey being scum because if someone is extremely loud about something you're doing and you don't change it in the slightest, you're probably standing behind a genuine belief.
Though more importantly, I don't hunt scum teams D1 and I've made it incredibly obvious I don't hunt scum teams D1. I'm working hard to respect the different ways people scumhunt and you should probably give me the same respect here.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:57 am
i mean i agree that game is a bad indicator of hop's meta but if anything that should show that moz is town here
and im also not really seeing how being wrong or right about someone's meta makes them scum
still eagerly waiting hop's scumcase on me
i was hoping you'd give insight though on how you would tell if i'm genuinely scumhunting vs looking for something to latch onto in the gamestate though
and im also not really seeing how being wrong or right about someone's meta makes them scum
still eagerly waiting hop's scumcase on me
thats fine? if you havent noticed ive been warming up to the idea you may be townFlubbernugget wrote:In post 1329, Katyusha wrote:also this implies monkey town + im wondering how you would be able to differentiate between the two hereIn post 1327, Flubbernugget wrote:Thinking about monkey's suspicions of you buddying him, you might just be coming from weird angles to grab a hold of the game state instead of scum hunt.
help me out a little?
I've been easing up on monkey being scum because if someone is extremely loud about something you're doing and you don't change it in the slightest, you're probably standing behind a genuine belief.
Though more importantly, I don't hunt scum teams D1 and I've made it incredibly obvious I don't hunt scum teams D1. I'm working hard to respect the different ways people scumhunt and you should probably give me the same respect here.
i was hoping you'd give insight though on how you would tell if i'm genuinely scumhunting vs looking for something to latch onto in the gamestate though
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:58 am
im here. it is almost lunch. i will post then
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:59 am
Also, I'm surprised you had a change of heart on the ucv wagon. The timing now that they're close to replacement seems as though you just wanted the wagon to muddle vca and waste time.
VOTE: buj
VOTE: buj
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:59 am
yeah i have the flu i cant do any of this shit rn
im psure flubb is town at this point
rem/kat/nm/moz still all likely town
ugh that prodge
im psure flubb is town at this point
rem/kat/nm/moz still all likely town
ugh that prodge
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:01 am
Okay DeWay you have until lunch because I am extremely impatient
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:01 am
looking forward to it then - please actually play the games you sign up for.In post 1359, Navigator wrote:im here. it is almost lunch. i will post then
he was like 1 hour from getting replaced - the point of the wagon is to emphasize that he's going to die if he doesn't post and if he's just getting replaced then it's mootFlubbernugget wrote:Also, I'm surprised you had a change of heart on the ucv wagon. The timing now that they're close to replacement seems as though you just wanted the wagon to muddle vca and waste time.
VOTE: buj
he's not getting replaced so i'm still very eager to lynch him
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:02 am
@1358: how does that make Moz more town to you? It's an intentionally (since he ignored the first time I refuted it) bad meta case. It's not a case of wrong/misguided- it's made with the intent of being misleading.
It is very unlikely I will be posting a scumcase on you before deadline as a.) time issues, b.) stronger lynch preferences c.) i don't see myself dying, so there's no urgency.
If you'd like to make a case on me as requested though, that would be nice.
It is very unlikely I will be posting a scumcase on you before deadline as a.) time issues, b.) stronger lynch preferences c.) i don't see myself dying, so there's no urgency.
If you'd like to make a case on me as requested though, that would be nice.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:03 am
kat, for your seph meta read, do you see the possibly of seph just having lack of motivation
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:03 am
A preview of what can happen if you don't post 6 hours from now.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:05 am
In post 1110, Katyusha wrote:He has been online and posting in other games.
He has a past precedent of replacing out of games when they get too fast as town.
Don't provide excuses for him if they're not there - if he has an issue with the game length then he can voice that but he still has shown that he's reading along in his subsequent posts.
DYKDW is a big boy, I'm sure he can defend himself on his own. Especially considering his lynch is for more than just inactivity.
'the point of the wagon is to emphasize he's going to die if he doesn't post...'In post 1363, Katyusha wrote:looking forward to it then - please actually play the games you sign up for.In post 1359, Navigator wrote:im here. it is almost lunch. i will post then
he was like 1 hour from getting replaced - the point of the wagon is to emphasize that he's going to die if he doesn't post and if he's just getting replaced then it's mootFlubbernugget wrote:Also, I'm surprised you had a change of heart on the ucv wagon. The timing now that they're close to replacement seems as though you just wanted the wagon to muddle vca and waste time.
VOTE: buj
he's not getting replaced so i'm still very eager to lynch him
'meta/general activity makes him likely to flip scum anyway.
can you pick one? These are mutually exclusive, and you denying the first when you said it wasn't a policy lynch.
Either you're happy to lynch him either way, or you aren't. You're saying conflicting things again.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:13 am
moz's gameplay in that game feels identical to this one was my point - i need to follow the conversation once more to see if it's a deliberate misrep myselfIn post 1364, Hopkirk wrote:@1358: how does that make Moz more town to you? It's an intentionally (since he ignored the first time I refuted it) bad meta case. It's not a case of wrong/misguided- it's made with the intent of being misleading.
It is very unlikely I will be posting a scumcase on you before deadline as a.) time issues, b.) stronger lynch preferences c.) i don't see myself dying, so there's no urgency.
If you'd like to make a case on me as requested though, that would be nice.
i've provided like preliminary thoughts on why i felt you were scum but i need to follow up with reading your scumgame in lycan's open
why pick one when i can articulate how they dont conflict owoHopkirk wrote:In post 1110, Katyusha wrote:He has been online and posting in other games.
He has a past precedent of replacing out of games when they get too fast as town.
Don't provide excuses for him if they're not there - if he has an issue with the game length then he can voice that but he still has shown that he's reading along in his subsequent posts.
DYKDW is a big boy, I'm sure he can defend himself on his own. Especially considering his lynch is for more than just inactivity.'the point of the wagon is to emphasize he's going to die if he doesn't post...'In post 1363, Katyusha wrote:looking forward to it then - please actually play the games you sign up for.In post 1359, Navigator wrote:im here. it is almost lunch. i will post then
he was like 1 hour from getting replaced - the point of the wagon is to emphasize that he's going to die if he doesn't post and if he's just getting replaced then it's mootFlubbernugget wrote:Also, I'm surprised you had a change of heart on the ucv wagon. The timing now that they're close to replacement seems as though you just wanted the wagon to muddle vca and waste time.
VOTE: buj
he's not getting replaced so i'm still very eager to lynch him
'meta/general activity makes him likely to flip scum anyway.
can you pick one? These are mutually exclusive, and you denying the first when you said it wasn't a policy lynch.
Either you're happy to lynch him either way, or you aren't. You're saying conflicting things again.
the point of the wagon is to emphasize he's going to die if he doesn't post, we're picking him specifically because his general activity is scummy in comparison to other lurkers so prod him first
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:18 am
you mgiht as well not have an opinion on Kat, Hop. lmao
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:20 am
You also said around the time of the first quote:
'He's ignoring the game deliberately.'
and that you're fine with the hammer.
That doesn't seem much like 'pushing a lurker'.
Either you think he's scummy enough to lynch, or you don't think he's scummy enough to lynch.
Can you confirm, based on 1368, that it is the second- that you do not think he is
'He's ignoring the game deliberately.'
and that you're fine with the hammer.
That doesn't seem much like 'pushing a lurker'.
Either you think he's scummy enough to lynch, or you don't think he's scummy enough to lynch.
Can you confirm, based on 1368, that it is the second- that you do not think he is
currently ]/i] scummy enough to be hammered right now, with caveats that this will change based on his posts, and when it gets closer to deadline.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:21 am
Eh, I mean there's no point posting a case at the moment since Kat isn't getting lynched today anyway.In post 1369, humaneatingmonkey wrote:you mgiht as well not have an opinion on Kat, Hop. lmao
Nobody's really commented on the inconsistencies I'm pointing out so they'd probably just skip high effort walls anyway.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:25 am
yes, he is not scummy enough to be hammered right now with caveats that this will change based on his posts and when it gets closer to deadline
also i ctrl-f'd just to make sure but the places where i said i was fine with a hammer i was generally playing along with a lolhammer in case ucv logged on and thought he was hammered
this isnt really a good reason to not out a controversial read
also i ctrl-f'd just to make sure but the places where i said i was fine with a hammer i was generally playing along with a lolhammer in case ucv logged on and thought he was hammered
people read my high effort walls so uhHopkirk wrote:Eh, I mean there's no point posting a case at the moment since Kat isn't getting lynched today anyway.In post 1369, humaneatingmonkey wrote:you mgiht as well not have an opinion on Kat, Hop. lmao
Nobody's really commented on the inconsistencies I'm pointing out so they'd probably just skip high effort walls anyway.
this isnt really a good reason to not out a controversial read
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:25 am
In post 1070, Not_Mafia wrote:Good decision
in context so it's clear i was responding to a lolhammer from monkeyIn post 1071, Katyusha wrote:UC continuing to ignore the game and Rem posting.In post 1068, Hopkirk wrote:What changed from it being a placeholder?
at this point though i'm fine with the hammer
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:27 am
If I die you'll be suspicious.
If I don't die, I can post it.
So it doesn't matter what happens at night.
I have two people (Moz/Bu) more likely to flip scum.
No point unless they both claim verifiable prs.
So it doesn't matter what happens today.
If I don't die, I can post it.
So it doesn't matter what happens at night.
I have two people (Moz/Bu) more likely to flip scum.
No point unless they both claim verifiable prs.
So it doesn't matter what happens today.