Mafiascum.net

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/burden_of_proof

"Generally, describes the standard that a party seeking to prove a fact in court must satisfy to have that fact legally established."

The fact that it is the accusing party who is burdened with proof in court is an example of a correlation where causation is not present, due to the fact that in court the accusing party is the claimant. The fact that you'd use this logical fallacy doesn't surprise me, considering you think mafia is not a game of logic.

I'm glad we had this talk

VOTE: Fractured

Me too.

VOTE: mbaki

This is the Enter head, BTW.

finally somebody votes me

granted probably the second worst slot in the game but anybody is better than nobody

1v1 me, please. I guarantee it won't turn out well for you.

I dont really care to 1v1 a bad player that might be town, but you can 1v1 empty air if you want

It's going to be so funny when you find out, too.

mbaki wrote:I dont really care to 1v1 a bad player that might be town, but you can 1v1 empty air if you want

I don't think empty air is capable of voting me.

Enter wtf was that 1v1

In post 1329, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:

In post 1328, Reality Check wrote:Has it been tested?

No, I'd rather not since it's once per game.

:THONK:

In post 1357, mbaki wrote:I dont really care to 1v1 a bad player that might be town, but you can 1v1 empty air if you want

Scum post from player who thinks he will lynch me.

In post 1359, Reality Check wrote:Enter wtf was that 1v1

Are you taking me at face value?

In post 1360, Reality Check wrote:

In post 1329, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:

In post 1328, Reality Check wrote:Has it been tested?

No, I'd rather not since it's once per game.

:THONK:

If you want to force me to parry a vote on someone else be my guest. That would be pretty bad though.

No I'm confused as to what that was about

I'm probably the most likely person here to pick up on what you're doing and I still don't

I think I'm going to break my rule and sub out, this game isnt even fun to shitpost and troll in

In post 1362, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:

In post 1360, Reality Check wrote:

In post 1329, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:

In post 1328, Reality Check wrote:Has it been tested?

No, I'd rather not since it's once per game.

:THONK:

If you want to force me to parry a vote on someone else be my guest. That would be pretty bad though.

I just find that very interesting

Continue

It's OK it will make sense in time it's not something you could have known about prior, honestly think we should have done this a while ago.

if you're asking for a hard 1v1 I will do it

but I've softed strong pr enough times now that if you're town it wont be a good plan regardless of who dies

and unless you have a day kill I will win rhetorically and you will die, keep that in mind

*shrugs* if you're right, maybe we're saving your life, then.

Sorry again, I haven't found time to catch up properly. Will do in a day.

:O

I wonder if I can make scum kill me tonight

Everything that was posted overnight is remarkably boring ):

In post 1049, Michael Scott wrote:there is higher town motivation to advance the game and post solid reads instead of mucking around, and is a fine reason (again) to townread them.

still skim catching up but I hope a few other people called this out

In post 1122, Varsoon wrote:oh, man, that sounds a lot like a scum tactic that would be used to suffocate outlying town voices that are right.

it could just as easily be a town tactic used to suffocate scum voices