In post 1350, zoraster wrote:I understand that this has benefited me somewhat and so I am loathe to point this out, but...
if we're just going to run every single person up to L-1 until they claim, let's just mass claim and get it over with.
Or maybe that's a
terrible
idea and we should pick someone to lynch. And that someone should be implosion.
o wow maybe i should have not unvoted u
Because I don't want to play like an idiot? okay, Bins.
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:13 pm
by xRECKONERx
okay welp i guess we wait
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:13 pm
by T-Bone
Yes Penguin, let's wagon the scummiest player in the game. That's how it works. May I remind you that for the town, we want to lynch scum, regardless of whether that lynch is "useful" or not.
Your claim and/or fakeclaim is between you and UT. Really has nothing to do with me (or anyone else for that matter).
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:14 pm
by the worst
does zor townpost ever? looking for spicy meta here
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:14 pm
by xRECKONERx
In post 1350, zoraster wrote:I understand that this has benefited me somewhat and so I am loathe to point this out, but...
if we're just going to run every single person up to L-1 until they claim, let's just mass claim and get it over with.
Or maybe that's a
terrible
idea and we should pick someone to lynch. And that someone should be implosion.
i mean do you think implosion claims VT at L-1 idfk
In post 1350, zoraster wrote:I understand that this has benefited me somewhat and so I am loathe to point this out, but...
if we're just going to run every single person up to L-1 until they claim, let's just mass claim and get it over with.
Or maybe that's a
terrible
idea and we should pick someone to lynch. And that someone should be implosion.
i mean do you think implosion claims VT at L-1 idfk
Yes.
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:16 pm
by xRECKONERx
i mean. alright. that's odd to me. i guess i could dig it. seems like a swing to be like "oh no im about to get lynched and need to save my ass, I'll claim VT and hope people fall for the bait instead of immediately hammering me"
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:19 pm
by T-Bone
to be honest, I am more surprised at all of the power roles that have revealed themselves so far, than I am of implosion claiming VT. Maybe scum!imp anticipates this and that's why he claims VT?
I feel like Zor is coming from a place of complaining that we didn't lynch his counterwagon...and that's bad
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:20 pm
by xRECKONERx
yeah honestly id probably swing back around for a zor lynch but i wanna see what happens with PP's vig
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:21 pm
by T-Bone
Wouldn't even consider PP if it's revealed to be fake and he tries to play it off as a reaction test?
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:21 pm
by the worst
if PP is fakeclaiming (or not, idk how UT would resolve anyway) we can just lynch zor...
In post 1363, xRECKONERx wrote:i mean. alright. that's odd to me. i guess i could dig it. seems like a swing to be like "oh no im about to get lynched and need to save my ass, I'll claim VT and hope people fall for the bait instead of immediately hammering me"
yes. and i think implosion is smart enough to know that claiming yet another power role would not have the "get off my wagon" effect.
But I
also
think that this is low stakes to lynch a vt and it's a really bad idea to keep turning over our cards until scum have a game plan.
Look, from a game-play standpoint, I'd have lynched
me
once I had to claim. Obviously I wasn't going to
fight
that, and I think implosion is the way to go. But good lord. Don't introduce yet another wagon. I don't get it.
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:24 pm
by zoraster
great.
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:28 pm
by T-Bone
OOC: For the record Penguin....UT STILL POSTED A VOTE COUNT /micdrop