Mafiascum.net

In post 1347, kuribo wrote:FL, you never addressed this:

In post 1322, Perry Pelican wrote:

In post 1193, Flavor Leaf wrote:I don’t believe I’ve been defending you. I’ve been thinking of passing on my Day 3 IC to you to see if you were really town or not.

In post 1195, Flavor Leaf wrote:Because essentially, that’s gonna be my role this game. I get to confirm one of the 3 of us as town, and if i pick someone who’s mafia, then they just don’t get confirmed.

I’m more than likely just gonna abuse it and get myself Towned. Just saying

This stopped being a vig claim and became a gunsmith claim. Possibly a loyal (X) role claim. Which made me think great, I can confirm myself with a vig shot, FL can do whatever it is he does to confirm or catch pops.

If I go through your iso I'm not gonna find you softing a bunch of shit am i

What am I supposed to address here...?

And nah, the only the I sorted were different iterations of Day 3 IC. I was trying to converse with RCE when I started vamping on it, but it’s obvious BS. Day 3 IC claim is obvious bs from the beginning, it was strictly to get my Vig claim across to RCE.

okay i've been wondering this for fifty pages now

who or what the fuck is RCE

In post 1351, kuribo wrote:okay i've been wondering this for fifty pages now

who or what the fuck is RCE

Oy mate.

and no, I didn't take the Day 3 IC thing seriously as I suspect no one did

my point is, he seems to be accusing you of softing GUNSMITH or loyal SOMETHING in your post 1195

In post 1352, Perry Pelican wrote:

In post 1351, kuribo wrote:okay i've been wondering this for fifty pages now

who or what the fuck is RCE

Oy mate.

what do you want from me i dont play league of legends or whatever

In post 1351, kuribo wrote:okay i've been wondering this for fifty pages now

who or what the fuck is RCE

Pelican’s an alt of RCEnigma

In post 1355, Flavor Leaf wrote:Pelican’s an alt of RCEnigma

ohhhhh







whos that

We played purge together. I was on Tet I think.

In post 1353, kuribo wrote:and no, I didn't take the Day 3 IC thing seriously as I suspect no one did

my point is, he seems to be accusing you of softing GUNSMITH or loyal SOMETHING in your post 1195

He’s just trying to cause WIFOM.

He knew I was Vig.

And if he didn’t, he was scum, who knew I was letting him think I was a Vig, but really was a gunsmiths

ScumHim worries about me actually being able to night kill him.

Him claiming Vig allowed him to confirm what I was because if I was actually a Vig, I counterclaim, he gets put into a favorable 1v1 that lets him live the day because he abuses players like Bingle, and if I was a Gunsmith, he gets a reliable excuse for having a gun.

FL knows I'm a braindead potato as scum and ofrhz can confirm this. So claiming I'm wifoming THE WHOLE PLAYERLIST is irrelevant. But it does warm my bird heart.

When I vig scum!FL I'm gonna write about it in my gtkas diary.

In post 1359, Perry Pelican wrote:FL knows I'm a braindead potato as scum and ofrhz can confirm this. So claiming I'm wifoming THE WHOLE PLAYERLIST is irrelevant. But it does warm my bird heart.

Braindead potato is a little mean

But yeah

In post 1359, Perry Pelican wrote:FL knows I'm a braindead potato as scum and ofrhz can confirm this. So claiming I'm wifoming THE WHOLE PLAYERLIST is irrelevant. But it does warm my bird heart.

To be fair, going for the Vig claim is literally what I gave as coaching advice to a newb scum partner (then years later she won best mafia performance)

And you also messed up with the role claim.

So I’m not claiming you’re next level scum play or anything.

However, I do see that you can be a solid scum player, but yeah.


And you’re hard exaggerating to defend yourself.

In post 1357, Perry Pelican wrote:We played purge together. I was on Tet I think.

Oh all I remember is DGB going on vacation, Carl intentionally pissing me off, then backing off* and then being surprised when I pointed out I always intended to shoot him and that I only calmed down because I knew I could sort him at night and die N1 too**


*see also: this game: Monger, Piss

**see also: this game: Monger, Piss

So one of the defenses for Pelican was that scum typically know exactly what is in their role PM and whatnot, right?

By Pelican’s own admittance, he’s a brain dead potato scum, which explains him legit slipping on a technicality, because I agree, it is a technicality, but it does prove him as scum the fact he confidently stated something contrary to both Pops and my role PM and that can only happen because of Freudian slip of his role PM not having to worry about knowing they investigate as mafia because he always investigates as mafia when he’s mafia.

He’s a good player, but unfortunately unlucky when scum.

So we have about 7-8 different strikes explaining why Pelican is scum.

Each of these strikes individually would high paint him as scum, but the fact they are all there proves he is scum.

way to go with 15 pages in 12 hours

And kuribo is still whinging around

In post 1366, Fish Monger wrote:way to go with 15 pages in 12 hours

And kuribo is still whinging around

Becauce Pelican is caught out scum and forced a 1v1 with me to save himself.

I actually think there’s a lot of good content in those pages.

In post 1362, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 1359, Perry Pelican wrote:FL knows I'm a braindead potato as scum and ofrhz can confirm this. So claiming I'm wifoming THE WHOLE PLAYERLIST is irrelevant. But it does warm my bird heart.

To be fair, going for the Vig claim is literally what I gave as coaching advice to a newb scum partner (then years later she won best mafia performance)

And you also messed up with the role claim.

So I’m not claiming you’re next level scum play or anything.

However, I do see that you can be a solid scum player, but yeah.


And you’re hard exaggerating to defend yourself.

Your claim is that i set up you to claim your shot and then derail it for a day 1 1v1 instead which should directly implicate pops because what do I care if you vig town!pops. It would have to be to save my partner. But I'm also a roleblocker so what's the point in hard connecting us when I can just stuff your shot. But I also set up the claim to manipulate a bunch of mechanical players that I don't know are mechanical players as I've never played with them before.

Even just that sounds convuluted in a way that I don't grasp.

In post 1363, kuribo wrote:*see also: this game: Monger, Piss

Except neither one of us will be shooting the other, so I have all game to comment upon your willful bile

Hey but have fun dying tonight since you claimed cop and all. Just go ninja that result into our hood - oh wait one result from you means fuckall hunh. oppps

stop scumplaining and just step into the noose already

In post 1369, Fish Monger wrote:Except neither one of us will be shooting the other, so I have all game to comment upon your willful bile

and you don't get to bitch about my attitude when you literally said you wanted to poke me

In post 1368, Perry Pelican wrote:

In post 1362, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 1359, Perry Pelican wrote:FL knows I'm a braindead potato as scum and ofrhz can confirm this. So claiming I'm wifoming THE WHOLE PLAYERLIST is irrelevant. But it does warm my bird heart.

To be fair, going for the Vig claim is literally what I gave as coaching advice to a newb scum partner (then years later she won best mafia performance)

And you also messed up with the role claim.

So I’m not claiming you’re next level scum play or anything.

However, I do see that you can be a solid scum player, but yeah.


And you’re hard exaggerating to defend yourself.

Your claim is that i set up you to claim your shot and then derail it for a day 1 1v1 instead which should directly implicate pops because what do I care if you vig town!pops. It would have to be to save my partner. But I'm also a roleblocker so what's the point in hard connecting us when I can just stuff your shot. But I also set up the claim to manipulate a bunch of mechanical players that I don't know are mechanical players as I've never played with them before.

Even just that sounds convuluted in a way that I don't grasp.

So this is a scum discredit pushing the things that I am right for the wrong reasons about.

There’s plenty here that I’ve stated for pushing a scum case that wasn’t brought up, a la the mismatched role pm.

I’m probably wrong about the role blocker.

Good thing I didn’t once use that as one of those strikes against you I’ve listed. That’s just hypothetical.

You broke down like 3 of my 15+ reasonings, 7-8 of which are damning on their own.

Agency of self, meet external locus