Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:34 pm
i'm townreading nibbui, actually
man this post makes very little sense. are you a 100 percent skitter readerIn post 1124, Almost50 wrote:skitter is blatantly town, Nibs. The mere fact that Bingle is semi-tunneling her proves it. If you want more, ISO Bingle in this very thread and see where he admits his reads are notoriously bad as town. So, town!Bingle SRing skitter = skitter is town. Scum!Bingle pushing skitter = skitter is town. And that doesn't even include my own read skitter which I had acquired by reading her posts and searching for her "scum tricks" and none were found.In post 663, Nibbui wrote:his norwegian interaction was pretty fine but his whiteknighting on skitt is icky
Only one way to find out (it's the latter)In post 1341, skitter30 wrote:the problem is that i can't tell if it's scum-indicative or playstyle-indicative
Ehhh still not really understanding what you mean here, sorry. ~beginning of game~ I started at nothing. Then *things* happened and I posted my readslist which was based on those *things*. That's how I got from A to B.skitter30 wrote:what i meant by that is more that i don't know how you got from ~beginning of game~ to ~readslist you posted~
i know my point is that i didnt' see the journey from a to b.In post 1356, Wickedestjr wrote:Then *things* happened and I posted my readslist which was based on those *things*. That's how I got from A to B.
In post 1130, Wickedestjr wrote:The other thing that feels strange to me is this post. You were asked hypothetically how you would approach skitter if you were scum. It feels a little weird to me that you claim you would have approached her completely differently from how you actually approached her in this game.Teachercan you expand on why you would approach skitter the way you described there?
Oh! My bad. half asleep already.In post 1350, skitter30 wrote:i'm townreading nibbui, actually
AFAIK, wicked hasn’t played in forever. Treat him like me when I first got back from hiatus and you’re probably close, although iirc he was less active and less manipulative than I am over all.In post 1349, Almost50 wrote:And a "side" problem is I have no experience with Nor or wicked, which means I can never be as confident on them either. But still, Nor looks town to me and wicked is "almost" a town read.
Having played two semi-recent games with Skit (since July), both times I saw her react poorly to open buddying/hero-worship. She is suspicious of that as town, and mimics suspicion of that as scum. If we were scum buddies, I might do it to allow her to distance, but as scum without her I would not try to buddy her. I would work in a reference to her (because we have recent experience, and it would be wierd of me not to), but otherwise put her on my suspect list because if that was ever a potential early lynch, I would want to be able to help it along.In post 1359, Wickedestjr wrote:teacher, please talk about this when you get the chance (if you haven't already)In post 1130, Wickedestjr wrote:The other thing that feels strange to me is this post. You were asked hypothetically how you would approach skitter if you were scum. It feels a little weird to me that you claim you would have approached her completely differently from how you actually approached her in this game.Teachercan you expand on why you would approach skitter the way you described there?
The stuff about me is NAI shadethrowing. He’s poking fun at me because it’s fun, but it’s something that would come from both town a50 and scum a50. Basically, he’s referring to the fact that I don’t trust my own reads and will try to solve a game through mechanics/gamestate over individual reads 9/10 times.In post 1354, skitter30 wrote:the stuff about jingle isn't meant to make much sense
he's p good at reading me
VOTE: uggly dogIn post 1240, Nibbui wrote:HI.
I'M THE MILITARY DICTATOR NIBBUI TAKING THIS THREAD HOSTAGE
TODAY WE'RE PLAYING "LYNCHING SCUMMY SLOTS FOR RED FLIPS". IT'S A NICE AND FAMILY FRIENDLY GAME.
FOR EMPHASIS WE START PLAYING BY VOTING EGIX.
VOTE: EGIX
YOU CAN ALSO VOTE "UGGLY DOG" FOR MEME REASONS
I had to think about this for a minute, but now I think I see what you're saying.In post 1358, skitter30 wrote:i know my point is that i didnt' see the journey from a to b.In post 1356, Wickedestjr wrote:Then *things* happened and I posted my readslist which was based on those *things*. That's how I got from A to B.
i just see you arriving at b
so i'm a little wary because i don't see how you got there
You generally think this. You generally are wrong.In post 1364, skitter30 wrote:teacher i think you may be scum