Mafiascum.net

stanley I've been pushing you since day 2, it surprises exactly no one that you would try to get me lynched today.

In post 1306, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Then scum knows when we target them. Nahdia claimed to visit hoctac even when it's extremely scummy to do so because she knew you tracked her for the kill.

Stanley knew I copped him last night too.

Oh you're referring to this. Yeah i don't see how the bolded part makes sense Albert.

My theory is that stanley has a scumbuddy watcher who alerted nahdia/stanley.

if we are in multiball here then maybe abr's faction has a rolecop and they are lynching scum from the other faction for towncred?

UNVOTE:
Theory:
Stan1ey’s claim is legit, and mafia tried to NK me tonight but failed because rolestop ability. Vig shot Gobbles.

Thoughts?

Because why would mafia shoot Gobbles? He wasn’t a threat, he wasn’t PR. He wasn’t widely townread.

If we could somehow confirm Gobble's wasn't a scum kill i would probably vote Albert instead of Stan1ey today.

And i mean... If scum would 'know' that i was a tracker like Albert suggests... Why TF would they kill Gobbledygook over me? They'd obviously try to kill me.

Something doesn't make sense about the NK on Gobbles, and i want you to explain your thoughts on it or i'm pushing for your lynch today Albert.

In post 1358, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Something doesn't make sense about the NK on Gobbles

EDIT: "The supposed nightkill" on Gobbles.

At work, this is a prodge, was thinking about the players not on bob's wagon.

i believe stan1ey and madonna are both scum.

In post 1332, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1331, farside22 wrote:Let me know if you want my hot take on it. It's my last offer for any game I will ever make.

Yeah, go ahead.
I'm starting to feel riled up by Albert's charisma. So i could definitely use some alternate viewpoints on this right now.

In post 1335, midwaybear wrote:lol it is pretty funny
idk why he would go so hard to get you lynched as scum though

Sorry I had some bad news so I didn't respond right away. I'm taking a few days off after this post.

Here is my hot take which is why I quoted Midway post as a reference.

See Abr before the claim was put under pressure. He already had a wagon and a case on him and now he has convoluted a storyline to use as a means to get his point across. The main question that midway asked is really simple. He was looking to be the player that most were looking to lynch today and as scum he saves himself one game day but creating this storyline.
So it's not a 1vs1 story that players are looking at it is what scum abr gains from doing this. He gains one more day and lynches another player instead of himself. He can also out a real CC in the process of doing all those actions.
I see more stan making a case, putting together idea's where I see Abr using manipulation to gain credit with the hopes that he will survive as scum one more day, because scum would love not only to see a now PR claim lynched but make sure they are not lynched back to back.


*drops mic*

Sorry to hear that mate hope all is well, take it easy

In post 1362, farside22 wrote:

In post 1332, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1331, farside22 wrote:Let me know if you want my hot take on it. It's my last offer for any game I will ever make.

Yeah, go ahead.
I'm starting to feel riled up by Albert's charisma. So i could definitely use some alternate viewpoints on this right now.

In post 1335, midwaybear wrote:lol it is pretty funny
idk why he would go so hard to get you lynched as scum though

Sorry I had some bad news so I didn't respond right away. I'm taking a few days off after this post.

Here is my hot take which is why I quoted Midway post as a reference.

See Abr before the claim was put under pressure. He already had a wagon and a case on him and now he has convoluted a storyline to use as a means to get his point across. The main question that midway asked is really simple. He was looking to be the player that most were looking to lynch today and as scum he saves himself one game day but creating this storyline.
So it's not a 1vs1 story that players are looking at it is what scum abr gains from doing this. He gains one more day and lynches another player instead of himself. He can also out a real CC in the process of doing all those actions.
I see more stan making a case, putting together idea's where I see Abr using manipulation to gain credit with the hopes that he will survive as scum one more day, because scum would love not only to see a now PR claim lynched but make sure they are not lynched back to back.


*drops mic*

mod: V/LA for 2-3 days

i think abr likely had other ways of surviving other than a fake-claim though. an abr lynch was certainly no sure thing.

gl farside, tomorrow is always better.

In post 1358, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Something doesn't make sense about the NK on Gobbles, and i want you to explain your thoughts on it or i'm pushing for your lynch today Albert.

Gobbles suspected me and scum killed him to frame me.

Take it easy farside, wishing you well.

In post 1267, Albert B. Rampage wrote:

In post 1150, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Nahdia should flip scum

I was aware Nahdia was scum dude

But if you were aware, why on earth would you fight against the lynch on Nahdia yesterday?

In post 1365, Albert B. Rampage wrote:

In post 1358, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Something doesn't make sense about the NK on Gobbles, and i want you to explain your thoughts on it or i'm pushing for your lynch today Albert.

Gobbles suspected me and scum killed him to frame me.

It's so obvious you're just making stuff up on the spot. If this was true why didnt I put this in my case on you ?

In post 1365, Albert B. Rampage wrote:

In post 1358, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Something doesn't make sense about the NK on Gobbles, and i want you to explain your thoughts on it or i'm pushing for your lynch today Albert.

Gobbles suspected me and scum killed him to frame me.

There were objectively so many better kills like me or Double Po Seven. The only reason i can think of is that they might have thought Gobbles was tracker based on his post 895.

Stan, what's your view on the things going on? And who do you think would be Albert's scum mates if he's faking his guilty on you?

In post 1367, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1267, Albert B. Rampage wrote:

In post 1150, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Nahdia should flip scum

I was aware Nahdia was scum dude

But if you were aware, why on earth would you fight against the lynch on Nahdia yesterday?

I needed to prolong the day to get better reads.

oh shit what have I woken up to

I thought Albert was a vig or some other pr from his play. It all makes sense if he is pr.

In post 1370, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Stan, what's your view on the things going on? And who do you think would be Albert's scum mates if he's faking his guilty on you?

My view is I dont understand why anyone would believe what ABR is saying as he is clearing just riffing on the spot but I guess thats just down to my bias as im the only one who know the truth

On scum buddies, midway has been kina wishy washy in the couple post he made, not really committing each way. Might just not have time to post yet but I wouldve expected him to post much more and have more solid opinion either way based on his play day 1 and 2. Votato hasnt even given me a fair chance, hes just considered me guilty from the start not even considering anything else. But idk if that's what scum would do here or if theyd bus me. It's hard to say cos I dont even know what I'd do if I was a scum buddy witnessing this tbh. But those are the two that stuck out to me. I'm also salty I listened to votato and claimed tbh