Mafiascum.net

In post 1346, notscience wrote:VOTE: nk15

Fight the power

In post 1347, notscience wrote:Call me scum for it I don’t give a fuck I’m not playing these reindeer games anymore I’m trying to lynch scum

In post 1348, notscience wrote:

In post 1347, notscience wrote:Call me scum for it I don’t give a fuck I’m not playing these reindeer games anymore I’m trying to clown scum

EBWOP

This looks quite emotionally loaded, especially with the L-word in it.
That`s town-indicative. notscience is in the group of three. If notscience is scum with Maki then two scum lynches are guranteed if we proceed as planned. In these situations, notscience has no other option but to desperately fight this situation.

I like this current gamestate because there is a lot of apathy for town and that makes it easy for me to lurk and then jump on the inevitable crap wagon on town when deadline starts appearing or people literally stop giving shits.

In post 1269, Alisae wrote:you only needed to counterclaim if you were 100% on NK15 being scum.

really really bad take

In post 1255, Alisae wrote:titus this game suxs

IK it’s hella boring when i’m not here. All these nerds talk way too much.

In post 1255, Alisae wrote:titus this game suxs

Now you see why T v A was hard despite "stomping" scum. I had to do things to hide my masons, manage my scumhunting and not turn into a dictator. Ico has one mason he must hide or town loses. It's stressful and hard on him. I'm sympathetic as there's no ideal approach but I feel dictator IC is the wrong one because it demotivates the voices needed to do well.

In post 1289, Iconeum wrote:Day 2 will be another matter entirely, and all of town will be needed to sort the information we have.
I think a 2-lynch option in which I may or may not veto sounds good.

This only looks like you aren't strongarming the game. If we get two wagons going and you veto them both, then what

In post 1339, username wrote:Like, I'm down with follow the leader in this case, mostly because what the fuck else am I doing with my life


But if umulat is that upset about it he sure doesn't seem to be putting any resistance toward killing what he says is gonna be a town flip


It just reeks of trying to absolve oneself of culpability

+1 my umlaut read just took a dive

In post 1350, Not Known 15 wrote:This looks quite emotionally loaded, especially with the L-word in it.
That`s not town-indicative. notscience is in the group of three. If notscience is scum with Maki then two scum lynches are guranteed if we proceed as planned. In these situations, notscience has no other option but to desperately fight this situation.

It is emotionally loaded because I hate seeing town forced into stupid ass lynched when scum can fake claim and get away Scott free

And then the person forcing everyone to follow on a lurker who hasn’t even done shit is belittling everyone for expressing their distaste in the wagon

And the person the wagon targets seems like defeatist town to take the cake?

And I accidentally used the l word because I’m still not used to the rule change yet and if that’s all you can say that’s hilarious

In post 1358, Titus wrote:

In post 1289, Iconeum wrote:Day 2 will be another matter entirely, and all of town will be needed to sort the information we have.
I think a 2-lynch option in which I may or may not veto sounds good.

This only looks like you aren't strongarming the game. If we get two wagons going and you veto them both, then what

I am only allowing myself 1 veto

You'll have to trust me on this I suppose

In post 1239, Menalque wrote:Idk, I enjoy a good mystery too or like a thriller but mostly I have a thing for magical realism stuff or just straight up literary fiction

ayyyy same

In post 1257, Umlaut wrote:Actually I don't even know if I want to execute notscience either, given he's one of the ones griping about this.

Siiiiigh

Umlaut

if I'm scum and I know the PA has chosen a lurky/NAI townie to execute on day 1

it is literally the easiest and most freebie LAMIST play to gripe about how we're executing somebody that you don't especially scumread, like if anything I think scum are likely to pretend to be convinced in the value of the elimination

why are you giving NS towncred for this??

In post 1299, Menalque wrote:Maybe it’s a wonderful choice and maki will flip scum and the pool will have tea and we’ll execute NK tomorrow and have a glorious win and ride off into the sunset, but it’s barely mafia and it’s certainly not mafia that I will have any fun playing and I think it makes it barely Mafia at all

you realize NK isn't in the pool right

this is kind of a weird mistake, please explain to me how you thought we'd execute NK if the pool has tea?

GL, you're right actually, it's not or shouldn't be a strong source of towncred (though not a source of anti-towncred because I don't actually think "scum are likely to pretend to be convinced in the value of the elimination").

I was just happy to see someone complaining about it and it made me have positive feelings toward them, I didn't think critically about how strong a tell it was.

In post 1364, GuiltyLion wrote:you realize NK isn't in the pool right

Oh hi Menalque.

Hi S_S

Is this yet another game where you’re going to fool me as scum?

I'm not going to fool you as scum...
*cough* sorry, what?

You know I think I have a worse read rate on you than literally anyone else on site?

Here you go, S_S:

I used to have a surefire tell on S_S where if he scumread me he was town, but that stopped working as of late when he townread me as scum

wait no I just read that back and I'm an idiot and I should have had him