Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:33 pm
don't confuse flavored charisma with being manipulative, that's not a button I can turn off.
The problem is it won’t. Town you knows this.In post 1346, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Mathblade - I will HAPPILY eliminate you here. Hold up, what are you talking about?
Does anyone in this game think I would not be 100% on board and helping push it further if a Mathblade wagon was happening?
Like, I'm holding back how hard I wanna push the mason thing right now because that's just not necessary. We are creating better discussion by where we are now on someone I think is likely to be scum as well, and isn't tinfoil.
This is literally the point I said I was making.In post 1344, MathBlade wrote:The more you talk the more I sort it.
Why would TownMe know that?In post 1353, MathBlade wrote:The problem is it won’t. Town you knows this.In post 1346, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Mathblade - I will HAPPILY eliminate you here. Hold up, what are you talking about?
Does anyone in this game think I would not be 100% on board and helping push it further if a Mathblade wagon was happening?
Like, I'm holding back how hard I wanna push the mason thing right now because that's just not necessary. We are creating better discussion by where we are now on someone I think is likely to be scum as well, and isn't tinfoil.
There is a guilty on the table. Yes, I am sure you probably would be on board and push it. Ignoring the guilty for a later day just ends up pushing things down the road here. If there wasn’t a guilty to sort, you’d be correct here and we would be at each other’s throats more than likely. However it’s not the right thing.
Pedit Outworld that’s impossible Ranny is my mason buddy
I had forgotten Ranny claimed the other Mason.In post 1353, MathBlade wrote:The problem is it won’t. Town you knows this.In post 1346, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Mathblade - I will HAPPILY eliminate you here. Hold up, what are you talking about?
Does anyone in this game think I would not be 100% on board and helping push it further if a Mathblade wagon was happening?
Like, I'm holding back how hard I wanna push the mason thing right now because that's just not necessary. We are creating better discussion by where we are now on someone I think is likely to be scum as well, and isn't tinfoil.
There is a guilty on the table. Yes, I am sure you probably would be on board and push it. Ignoring the guilty for a later day just ends up pushing things down the road here. If there wasn’t a guilty to sort, you’d be correct here and we would be at each other’s throats more than likely. However it’s not the right thing.
Pedit Outworld that’s impossible Ranny is my mason buddy
Got you confused with BM. He claimed vt when he claimed neighborized. That’s what I was thinking of.In post 1358, OutWorldER wrote:Alright. I'm still confused why he said I claimed VT when I never did but okay.
NPOM says outer is scum.In post 1356, Flavor Leaf wrote:There is not a guilty on the table? what?
I am not playing dumb anywhere. There is not a guilty. You claimed he's Not Vanilla. How is that a guilty?In post 1359, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Not liking leaf playing dumb
I don't want to claim because we already outed a shitton of info to scum.In post 1361, MathBlade wrote:Outer not claiming here makes them look like scum here.In post 1356, Flavor Leaf wrote:There is not a guilty on the table? what?
Assume NPOM and Outer are town.In post 1362, Flavor Leaf wrote:I am not playing dumb anywhere. There is not a guilty. You claimed he's Not Vanilla. How is that a guilty?In post 1359, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Not liking leaf playing dumb
Can you please not reference genitalia in games? Thanks!In post 1363, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm not gonna get into a dick waving contest with leaf. Leaf and Ower are partners
NPOM running with it instead of knowing if you were right or wrong is why they’re scum. You don’t just miss a claim from the one player whose claim you should be looking for.In post 1360, Rannygazoo wrote:Got you confused with BM. He claimed vt when he claimed neighborized. That’s what I was thinking of.In post 1358, OutWorldER wrote:Alright. I'm still confused why he said I claimed VT when I never did but okay.
Claim. You're obviously something, I think you're blatantly obvious townNewbie, in a good way?In post 1364, OutWorldER wrote:I don't want to claim because we already outed a shitton of info to scum.In post 1361, MathBlade wrote:Outer not claiming here makes them look like scum here.In post 1356, Flavor Leaf wrote:There is not a guilty on the table? what?
I'm very cagey with information as Town. If multiple people start screaming at me to claim I will but right now I don't see the point when the Nea claim is contested and it's not even any sort of guilty to begin with.
I feel like the answer should be obvious by now. He's actively not claiming even in this position. He's either an investigative or a protective. He's is a classic just past Newbie game level town player.In post 1365, MathBlade wrote:Assume NPOM and Outer are town.In post 1362, Flavor Leaf wrote:I am not playing dumb anywhere. There is not a guilty. You claimed he's Not Vanilla. How is that a guilty?In post 1359, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Not liking leaf playing dumb
Assume Ranny and I are scum incorrectly.
Balance the setup. NPOM would have to be an odd night Neo. What would Outer be? And if this was possible why hasn’t outer claimed?
If you and Ranny are scum that means there are no masons.MathBlade wrote:Assume NPOM and Outer are town.In post 1362, Flavor Leaf wrote:I am not playing dumb anywhere. There is not a guilty. You claimed he's Not Vanilla. How is that a guilty?In post 1359, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Not liking leaf playing dumb
Assume Ranny and I are scum incorrectly.
Balance the setup. NPOM would have to be an odd night Neo. What would Outer be? And if this was possible why hasn’t outer claimed?