Mini Normal 2181 | College Basketball Players | Game Over

petapan · Post Post #1350 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:57 pm

UNVOTE:

Cabd · Post Post #1351 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:59 pm

In post 1347, fferyllt wrote:Cabd don't leave me here sinking into a pool of self doubt.

But like, I'm here but I'm avoiding the thread because it got all high impact again and I'm only allowed during low impact zones.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1352 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:59 pm

In post 1349, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I was referring to it more as "I've never incorrectly scum-read you before" so I don't know where you would think "not this again" when it didn't happen before ?

Calling me scum before I start posting has become a new site tradition, hence the 'not again.'

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1353 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:00 pm

like I'm not saying "because I was right about DGB in death curse, i am right about her here..."

I'm saying, when she says "not this shit again" I don't know what she's referring to because I don't remember a time when I call her scum on D1? Tho I mean I could just be really silly and forgot about it.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1354 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:00 pm

In post 1352, DrippingGoofball wrote:Calling me scum before I start posting has become a new site tradition, hence the 'not again.'

ok that makes more sense.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1355 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:01 pm

In post 1351, Cabd wrote:
In post 1347, fferyllt wrote:Cabd don't leave me here sinking into a pool of self doubt.
But like, I'm here but I'm avoiding the thread because it got all high impact again and I'm only allowed during low impact zones.

Yeah true or not I don't see how this is AI. But a lot if the discussion in this fine game has nothing to do with alignment.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1356 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:02 pm

Dance with me DGB?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1357 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:05 pm

Let's set the dance floor on fire

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1358 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:06 pm

With our great dance moves, not like criminally insane pyromaniacs!

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1359 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:09 pm

Cabd · Post Post #1360 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:09 pm

Was gonna have more but my daughter is having night terrors. Guess I'll call it.

petapan · Post Post #1361 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:28 pm

In post 1355, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 1351, Cabd wrote:
In post 1347, fferyllt wrote:Cabd don't leave me here sinking into a pool of self doubt.
But like, I'm here but I'm avoiding the thread because it got all high impact again and I'm only allowed during low impact zones.
Yeah true or not I don't see how this is AI. But a lot if the discussion in this fine game has nothing to do with alignment.

hi, how's it going? just want to ask - earlier in the game you made a bet i was scum, presumably because i wasn't posting much at the time. that seems to have gone away in your recent posting. is that just because i said you were town, or what?

Elements · Post Post #1362 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:26 am

In post 1190, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1099, Elements wrote:Cabd - could go either way, willing to vote
your progression on cabd doesn't really square with u being willing to vote ffery on his say-so

I don't think I'll be able to read ffery this game so if someone makes a good case for why I should vote there I don't see why I wouldn't do so.

In post 1146, petapan wrote:okay. two more questions. why did ben go to scum for you, and why did cabd go from scum to unsure to a slight townlean for you?

ben - DGB's read list analysis and otherwise general lack of anything
cabd - as I kept reading I tried to think of why scum!cabd would play this way. Nothing ponged me as particularly scummy or fake so the read migrated.

In post 1334, Cabd wrote:
In post 1330, fferyllt wrote:Why is bork such a strong townread?
The elements rule is you have to passive aggressively quote this twice more for me to answer it.

boooooooooooo
bad joke
boooooooooooo

petapan · Post Post #1363 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:59 am

the more people post the more i wanna hear answers from ben that i suspect i'm never gonna get

skitter30 · Post Post #1364 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:24 am

Pooky is town i think

petapan · Post Post #1365 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:35 am

In post 533, Mod Pizza wrote:What do you think of skitter, peta?

In post 536, petapan wrote:
In post 533, Mod Pizza wrote:What do you think of skitter, peta?
i dunno. catchup post was meh everything after that i don't really have a problem with

in hindsight if i were actually reading the game critically at that point in time a lot of the arguments she was making against pizza man weren't good

skitter30 · Post Post #1366 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:47 am

Feel free to elaborate ...

petapan · Post Post #1367 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:49 am

oh wait just saw the elements thing was a typo that changes my view? (maybe?)

Mod Pizza · Post Post #1368 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:54 am

I'm not feeling v motivated for this game atm

did anything interesting happen?

skitter30 · Post Post #1369 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:55 am

In post 1367, petapan wrote:oh wait just saw the elements thing was a typo that changes my view? (maybe?)

It was, yes

Pizza can i interest u in voting ffery?

petapan · Post Post #1370 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:58 am

In post 1368, Mod Pizza wrote:I'm not feeling v motivated for this game atm

did anything interesting happen?

imo yes but you're gonna have to want to dig a little bit

Mod Pizza · Post Post #1371 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:02 am

VOTE: ffery

Mod Pizza · Post Post #1372 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:02 am

In post 1370, petapan wrote:
In post 1368, Mod Pizza wrote:I'm not feeling v motivated for this game atm

did anything interesting happen?
imo yes but you're gonna have to want to dig a little bit

can u not just tell me tho

petapan · Post Post #1373 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:09 am

is my take on things important

Prism · Post Post #1374 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:11 am

In post 1208, borkjerfkin wrote:I guess I assumed that 858 was one of the charitable posts I was ignoring. If that's not what you meant then whatever, disregard

It
should've
had a point though - a legitimate miscommunication did happen and instead you're basically framing it like it's just a lack of understanding on my end and now that you've clarified your position I should get on the same page as you instead of reevaluating the context of our entire conversation and really fucking undermines how clear you're apparently being.

I don't consider that sort of "I'm so confident in my worldview that i can't understand how you have the opinion you do" attitude to be inherently scummy, but every interaction you've had with me has been you immediately jumping up my ass about something and when I react in a way that states that I don't see things the way you do, much less getting combative in response, your response is pointing and saying "bork's being unreasonable because he's not acknowledging that he's trying to undermine my argument" and i don't think you legitimately believe that

I have spent the better part of ~12 hours trying to figure out a response to this that I think will be productive.

I feel there isn't one. You have confirmed my understanding of your viewpoint repeatedly. At no point have you convinced me of the same for mine.

I will not respond to or address you on this topic again, though I might others. I will backlink you 982 and 998 as general, non-specific parting gifts of reference should you wish to review my slot.