hey Hydra simulpost, DGB hedre, #1373 was from Elli.
I'm very sad that we're not lynching vezo.
Re: Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:51 pm
by hasdgfas
Benmage wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
Benmage wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
Benmage wrote:Cow why you against a dana lynch?
didn't say I am, I just think SSBF is scummier. Honestly, I'm iffy on dana's claim, as I said before, but I think SSBF is a higher priority,
and haven't seen anything to convince me otherwise
.
So you don't like Percy's case?
what a great strawman. I said SSBF is a higher priority,
not
that dana isn't scummy.
Mmm my mistake. So why do you think dana is scummy(Percy reasoning?), and why not as a high a priority as SSBF?
you could go with Percy reasoning, but that's not the entire thing. Doing a quick look-through, he seemed to be suspicious of a bunch of people who voted for him, and I always feel iffy about people who do that. He's not as high priority as SSBF IMO, because I don't think he's as scummy as SSBF. How is that so hard to believe? I'd vote for dana to get a lynch near deadline, but I'd prefer an SSBF lynch.
Re: Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 1:36 pm
by Benmage
hasdgfas wrote: How is that so hard to believe? I'd vote for dana to get a lynch near deadline, but I'd prefer an SSBF lynch.
Yes, I'm tired of beating this dead horse for now. My inquiries were largely because of the crappy bulleted case I was presented with. But we can move on.
Re: Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 1:49 pm
by Thor665
Benmage wrote:So it would be fair to say it ranges? Varying from instance to instance and being slight scummy?-To very scummy?
Lurking is a tell, like everything else in this game. They all have degrees that are adjusted for time, place, player, and feel of the game (and probably other variables I'm still learning). In short - yes.
Would you yield some scum points for Locke and diddin's lurkerness?
By 'yield' I presume you mean 'bestow'. I wouldn't particularly to diddin at the moment, since his low post count comes from predecessors who flaked, that seems null to me as I don't believe they flaked for scum reasons. For lurking to apply to him will take more game time to ascertain his posting habits. Locke seems okay on content when he does post, so I also wouldn't particularly try to peg him with a scummy lurking charge, though I do feel he's being a touch anti-town with how little he's commenting.
Well what occurred with this over posting scum? Were they flooding the game with small fluffy posts, were they of the top post counts, were they simply the most or more active people in game etc etc, some more details if you could.
One was Ythan, nuff said. The other was me - I was choosing to exploit my belief that people tend to overlook 'active' posters for at least the first few days of the game. I've also seen Fate do a high post content scum, but you seem upset when I cite him.
This is going somewhere eventually, yes? This seems like pointless chatter that is not helping us scumhunt, does not clarify either your or my own alignments, and is clogging the thread needlessly.
Benmage wrote:I didn't want to narrow your scope. Had I given direction you may have missed your suspicions on ML, or failed to confirm your locke/diddin sentiment. You also have new(or recollected) insight on dripp.
I'd already stated my suspicions of ML, all this post did was *maybe* give me some clarification of why I had those suspicions...it would have done this by me simply reading it. As for the rest...you're basically apparently listing how the post helped me sorta scumhunt. That doesn't actually reflect back on it being a functional post for you, nor does it explain why I was the player asked to comment upon the post (unless your inference is I'm muddled and lost and need help with organizing my scumreads)
Re: Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 1:51 pm
by Thor665
Mina wrote:Now that there's a day left and people are already going, "Gee, I'm not that sure that dana is scum, but you know, there's no time left, so guess there's no choice!", I'm trying my second suspect. Because I'm Smurfing tired of watching players whose cases I'm lukewarm on get lynched at deadline.
Just to clarify - who do you think is waffling on the dana lynch thus far? I might have missed it but I'm pretty sure most of the "I belive the claim" people are on other wagons at the moment.
Re: Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:00 pm
by hasdgfas
Benmage wrote:
hasdgfas wrote: How is that so hard to believe? I'd vote for dana to get a lynch near deadline, but I'd prefer an SSBF lynch.
Yes, I'm tired of beating this dead horse for now. My inquiries were largely because of the crappy bulleted case I was presented with. But we can move on.
you asked for bullets
Re: Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:03 pm
by Benmage
hasdgfas wrote:
Benmage wrote:
hasdgfas wrote: How is that so hard to believe? I'd vote for dana to get a lynch near deadline, but I'd prefer an SSBF lynch.
Yes, I'm tired of beating this dead horse for now. My inquiries were largely because of the crappy bulleted case I was presented with. But we can move on.
you asked for bullets
3 of which were nothing! And others weren't overly convincing.
Re: A Clash of Kings - Day 2 - A Restless City
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:20 pm
by Benmage
Thor665 wrote:1) That doesn't actually reflect back on it being a functional post for you, nor does it explain why I was the player asked to comment upon the post 2)(unless your inference is I'm muddled and lost and need help with organizing my scumreads)
1The post was not solely for you.
2Yes (to a degree)
And don't listen to slow ones like Mina, you have been a contrasting epitome of the all too often obstinate behavior I come in contact with. So kudos.
Here’s taken from that post of mine the people you find suspicious.
dannakillsu-----70
Hayker CSL -----4/34
Super Smash Bros. Fan-----75
Benmage----111
Drippereth----135
MacavityLock----28
Granted content is quite key here as well.
Now if you want feel free to rethink about who and why you find these people scummy, and how and why you even measure "scummyness"
Concluding, there were points to this interplay. I have successfully gotten a good read on you. So I have since wanted to move to two further steps. That is one to make you come to an epiphany, and 2 is more for me (and that is to measure your capacity as a scum-hunter). Our discussion for now can be complete, because I don’t want to open the pandora’s box yet(the list of those people less scummy than me). That said if at any moment you have an epiphany, please let me know.
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:19 pm
by Axelrod
Given how he's reacted to being stabbed, I could get up for a CSL lynch, though I doubt that could be arranged before deadline. If there is a vig out there in space I think he's a better choice than Vezo. Vezo's mind is hard to comprehend, but the idea that he simply screwed up his claim on day 1 (for no reason at all) and now is trying to back-track out of it (in a very bizarre way) doesn't feel right. What feels more right is that his mind simply works in a way that I don't understand. I do believe he is like 13 or something.
Re:
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:33 pm
by diddin
Locke Lamora wrote:Putting Vezo at L-8 with 30 hours to go? This is a viable wagon?
Magna: I stabbed Kinetic.
Diddin: so why exactly did you read town on Macavity earlier? It's not as though him avoiding the Raivann wagon is a new event.
I barely remembered anything about his content and just remembered a few people calling him town. It wasn't a solid read.
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:22 am
by Eddard Stark
14.5 hours remaining
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:51 am
by vezokpiraka
Drip hydra drives me nuts. One says I am town the other says I am scum.
Someone needs to hammer dana. We are half a day (RL) to no lynch.
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:09 am
by xvart
Wow. Benmage goes on a posting spree... Regardless, it's hammer time.
xvart.
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:38 am
by Rifka Viveka
Since days last weeks...I'd say 30 hours is a time crunch and that theres no time for a wagon switch. Noones even attempting to be persuasive enough. Everyones heard people's pieces on Vezo, SSBF, Dana, and CSL...and look where the votes are. Noone promoting the alternative lynches is going out of their way to pick at peoples cases/votes, so nothings going to change. Dana will hang.
I can only speak for myself, but im leaning scum on 3 of those now(csl im a little iffy on) so why would i or anyone that felt the same way attack those cases? If i want SSBF lynched over dana but i still think dana is scum, it doesnt really make sense to try to demolish a dana case.
card flip time
Unvote Vote Danakillsu
Re: A Clash of Kings - Day 2 - A Restless City
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:06 am
by Eddard Stark
Re: A Clash of Kings - Day 2 - A Restless City
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:30 am
by Eddard Stark
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:29 am
by Eddard Stark
I Doubt it -
Joffrey Baratheon
-
Lannister Aligned Goon
was hacked to pieces Night 2
LynchMePLs -
Barristan Selmy
-
Innocent Aligned
-'New' Kingsguard Recruiter was poisoned Night 2
Drippereth -
Stannis Baratheon
-
Innocent Aligned
- Vanilla Townie was drowned Night 2
Day 3 begins. With 18 alive it takes 10 to lynch.
Stand by. (Don't post yet)
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:12 pm
by Eddard Stark
With that out of the way, honour your gods, and get to lynching!
We can do this one of two ways. Percy, or someone we think is scum.
I think Percy should nominate himself to step forward.
(
@MOD
does everyone vote for most worthy or only those who step forward get to also vote?)
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:33 pm
by diddin
Vote: SSBF
He's still scum.
We should use this on someone we have a less certain read on instead of someone we could just lynch.
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:40 pm
by Benmage
Re-reading I doubt it, I find it nearly impossible for SSBF to be a Lannister.
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:41 pm
by Eddard Stark
Everyone may vote, not just those that step forward
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:47 pm
by Benmage
Moving right along. Here's the list of people soon be further examined, iso'd, and maybe even pbpa. Order decending in importance based on read(or lack thereof) as well as scumminess...Also gonna look into the lynches, wagons, and deaths yada yad etc etc.
MacavityLock
Locke Lamora
Rifka Viveka
Mina
Xvart
Axelrod
Unsight
Mikujin
In the meantime we can start wagoning up vezo.
Vote Vezopiraka
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:50 pm
by diddin
Benmage wrote:Re-reading I doubt it, I find it nearly impossible for SSBF to be a Lannister.
I think he's a Greyjoy, as shown by his reluctance to vote Raivann and just his overall scumminess.