Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 11:01 am
And yet you're following enough to respond within three minutes of being mentioned, having not posted for five days...
#1: Maggie was just a simple thought of a flavor role in this game. Of course, I did think she would be a killer because of that episode of when Mr.Burns wasConsigliere wrote:Why did you bold "Maggie" in one of your first posts?
I hate the bold thing....cuz I always see it as some sort of soft or fake claim deal....Just for emphasis I presume? I'll say this much, you doing that gives a player like me a reason to pause before voting you.
Also, you adding "fuuu" to your claim makes me wonder just what the hell you are doing as well. It is confusing as hell...IE: Are you playing the "Nah I was just jokin' guize!" deal?
Soup to nuts story on you (thus far): Confusing is not cool...especially intentional confusion creation....and my take is I wouldn't shed a tear at your lynching.
This is actually really funny. If you're bored, go read Wraith's ISO in Lord of the Rings Mafia.Consigliere wrote:Yes, I do think that dissecting a character can be beneficial. If somebody said they were Denethor/VT in a LOTR mafia, for example, the eyes would squint.
rolefishing again!Tragedy wrote:#1: Maggie was just a simple thought of a flavor role in this game. Of course, I did think she would be a killer because of that episode of when Mr.Burns wasConsigliere wrote:Why did you bold "Maggie" in one of your first posts?
I hate the bold thing....cuz I always see it as some sort of soft or fake claim deal....Just for emphasis I presume? I'll say this much, you doing that gives a player like me a reason to pause before voting you.
Also, you adding "fuuu" to your claim makes me wonder just what the hell you are doing as well. It is confusing as hell...IE: Are you playing the "Nah I was just jokin' guize!" deal?
Soup to nuts story on you (thus far): Confusing is not cool...especially intentional confusion creation....and my take is I wouldn't shed a tear at your lynching.accidentallyshot by Maggie, or was it not...
#2: Had to claim immediately since Iknewthere would be a large wagon against me, and it was during the night, though... TheFuuupart was just for quick boredom, mhm. Thus far, yes, I am aVanilla Townie. As the Comic Book Guy, I don't reallydoanything during the night. Doesn't seem scum, but any scum would claim him since no one would've really thought of claiming him anyways. I state no lies for being a VT. Phoo.
Hiraki was an early suspect of mine at the onset of this game. Constantly trying to keep my head above water made scum-hunting difficult as I was focusing on regaining a grip on things. As a result concentration on him faded. As D1 progressed I saw more things which raised eyebrows from other people like DBE, and Tragedy. I had a meta scum come to light in NC, and a strong suspicion of Kagelord. I had Jason as a rollercoaster of a read and yes I had my #1 town read post restricted calling for Jasons head, on the basis that he was attacking Jason for a majority of D1 and Jason would want him quite. That initial logic seemed sound.The Fonz wrote:Ben: at the start of day two, why was KageLord in your view a better vote than Hiraki? Why was Jason a better vote than either?
Everything that you didn't address. If that ISO was as terrible and minimal as you say, that shouldn't be a problem. Requoted below for your benefit/Benmage wrote:What did I miss that you want commented on?
I was expecting you to explain how that quote was preserving the integrity of the game.Nachomamma8 wrote:This doesn't sound like some martyr trying to preserve the integrity of the game to me. This just sounds like he's pissed off.
Should be obvious what I'm expecting.Nachomamma8 wrote:If you're voting to obtain information, what's the problem with removing the vote when you get the information you want?
Referring to the "mist have your siblings claim" post.Nachomamma8 wrote:Don't like this, obviously.
As has been mentioned,Wraith wrote:Are we set on lynching Tragedy today or not? I'm willing to hammer if it's definitely Tragedy, but TBH I'd rather lynch DBE.
Point.Mariyta wrote:As has been mentioned,Wraith wrote:Are we set on lynching Tragedy today or not? I'm willing to hammer if it's definitely Tragedy, but TBH I'd rather lynch DBE.repeatedly, odds are much higher of hitting scumoffthe wagon. If we're going to lynch anyoneonthe wagon, it damn well better be Hiraki.
By "strong suspicion of Kagelord" was that mostly due to the darla-rolefish event, some hypocrisy on game effort, and mist sheep vote? I really don't like any of the logic in this post.Benmage wrote:Hiraki was an early suspect of mine at the onset of this game. Constantly trying to keep my head above water made scum-hunting difficult as I was focusing on regaining a grip on things. As a result concentration on him faded. As D1 progressed I saw more things which raised eyebrows from other people like DBE, and Tragedy. I had a meta scum come to light in NC, and a strong suspicion of Kagelord. I had Jason as a rollercoaster of a read and yes I had my #1 town read post restricted calling for Jasons head, on the basis that he was attacking Jason for a majority of D1 and Jason would want him quite. That initial logic seemed sound.The Fonz wrote:Ben: at the start of day two, why was KageLord in your view a better vote than Hiraki? Why was Jason a better vote than either?
At the moment I’d probably have to do an iso read or skim of Hiraki to even really recall that players game. Have they been relatively quiet of late? I seem to remember (off the top of my head) things of non- consequence and it seemed like Hiraki was more of a noob than anything else. I have trouble reading the inexperienced and the village idiots.
L-2, for those not paying attention.Wraith wrote:Unvote Vote: Tragedy
What was illogical?Steven Hacking wrote: I really don't like any of the logic in this post.
Lack of content, and failure to answer questions.Steven Hacking wrote:
When you refer to Nacho's iso, is it just the amount of content, or is there something that is specifically scummy that I'm failing to see?
Wraith was already on the wagon at the time of the Vote Count. There are still only 9/12 votes on Tragedy.Mariyta wrote:L-2, for those not paying attention.Wraith wrote:Unvote Vote: Tragedy
P-edit: Waiting patiently. Feel better.
P-edit: Tragedy, weknowthere are two scum on the wagon. So yes, we will hit scum there, too. But right now, odds are better off the wagon.
Why just single me out there? lolTragedy wrote:Kk. Thanks for lynching a VT then!
I hope Town wins miraculously, then.
Enjoy your luck tonight <3, but you wouldn't really care for an idiot to be lynched anyways. Satisfied, JASON?
Bah. You're right. L-3 then.SensFan wrote:Wraith was already on the wagon at the time of the Vote Count. There are still only 9/12 votes on Tragedy.Mariyta wrote:L-2, for those not paying attention.Wraith wrote:Unvote Vote: Tragedy
P-edit: Waiting patiently. Feel better.
P-edit: Tragedy, weknowthere are two scum on the wagon. So yes, we will hit scum there, too. But right now, odds are better off the wagon.