Look dude, you're wrong about me, and I've even claimed intent to hammer, why are you still trying to "prove" that I am scum? Just say that you have nothing else to say and that you are going to wait for my self-hammer
This post wasn't even a case, it was more of a "best hits" review of my awesomeness, which includes great "analysis" from rainbowjake such as this:
In post 1248, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote: In post 1247, GoodCopBadCop wrote:Can you guys who are calling me suspicious actually provide evidence instead of just going "lulz, GCBC's ISO looks kinda scummy".
The Hapa kill makes the most sense from RainbowJake's pov. They're getting protected by CP so there's no need for them to kill him.
Don't end the day yet. Things have started to get interesting again.
- GC
This is a prime example of a scummy ass post.
Which is my partner literally informing you that we've done nothing scummy this game. If us telling you that we're not scum is a scumtell, then EVERYONE IS SCUM
In post 1379, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:
but here you go. explain this one
In post 1370, GoodCopBadCop wrote:I also wanna throw out there that I woulda lynched ac1983 fan despite the 1-shot doc claim, it was goodcop and rainbowjake that seemed to push the town onto random lynching a townie.
but YOU say this
That doesn't look like a person who wanted to vote AC despite the claim to me...
Really? Saying "I'm good" with a lynch reads to you like someone who REALLY wants to vote Nic over AC? Saying "I'm good" is my way of surrenduring to my partner
Seriously, read our interactions in this game:
In post 386, GoodCopBadCop wrote:^^I decided for you
VOTE: acfan1983
A chance to show off my p2 read being accurate? I'm in
-BadCop
but whatever, you've got your blinders on (which is obvious since you are still trying to pin a "case" on me
after I've claimed intent to hammer
), so good luck tomorrow
Still gonna wait for some more discussion so you guys can figure out who to lynch tomorrow