Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 3:30 pm
I just realized something.
We need to get Jon Doe and Sugar Cain to claim.
Can we run them up quickly?
We need to get Jon Doe and Sugar Cain to claim.
Can we run them up quickly?
DGB here.In post 1377, Sugar Cain wrote:Why should we claim, Mollie?
In post 1379, Ms Marangal wrote:DBG, we promise you we don't have any capability to kill, Period
~Sugar
If the post wasn't signed or having arrows to it having me claim it, my other head did it. I find it annoying when Hydras don't sign.In post 1346, Amrun wrote:And Jon doe, that answer grows old. Find out why one of you did something so stupid, explain why, and start signing your damn posts.
Try to describe why he's scummy.In post 1389, MattP wrote:If I was wrong to change my read on Jon Doe I'll be sadpanda
In post 1344, Sugar Cain wrote:Over the top reactions and general behavior? Way to be vague. Yes, Thor and Amrun calling us scum out the fucking blue with little or no reasoning was pretty derptastic. AJ selectively scumhunting us was pretty bad, too. I'm going to react but I don't think my reaction to ANYTHING has been over the top.In post 1312, Jon Doe wrote:Absolutely not. Wayne laid down the meta case against GiF. As for you, your over the top reactions and general behavior in the thread make me paranoid enough. Then, there is Thor's case which is decent but I don't fully trust Thor. I have bigger fish to fry than you. I might change my mind in the mean time.In post 1281, Sugar Cain wrote:WHAT is this?In post 1274, Jon Doe wrote:Sugar and OGML are both consistent with how the nightkills went down.
This is basically, after the Trust Fund flip, I would expect scum to start attacking us hard for no reason. Given the fact both of you have voted us, you being scum is consistent with my view of how the nightkills went down.
So that's the only reason you suspect us other than "Sugar and GIF being the most talked about in the thread"Sugar's voting pattern has been erratic at best.
Scum attack over the TF kill makes sense. The process goes as follows, kill a failed lynch train, claim the biggest player pushing the train is scum, find whatever reason you can to FoS that player and try to link the kill to them. I figured I'd preempt the scums by highlighting this is a likely play.In post 1357, Sugar Cain wrote:Also note, that our hydra was scumreading John Doe on day 1 as well. Their claim that they are being attacked over the Trust Fund kill is stupid stupid stupid.
Why you think that scum would attack you over the TF kill?
Who are your top 4 scum reads?
\In post 1393, Titus wrote:Scum attack over the TF kill makes sense. The process goes as follows, kill a failed lynch train, claim the biggest player pushing the train is scum, find whatever reason you can to FoS that player and try to link the kill to them. I figured I'd preempt the scums by highlighting this is a likely play.
Oh, I'm just calling you on your bullshit. I figured you might disagree but its nice that you agree that you of full of it.In post 1393, Titus wrote:This sounds like an opinion bordering on an discredit. If you have a question, please rephrase.In post 1344, Sugar Cain wrote:Over the top reactions and general behavior? Way to be vague. Yes, Thor and Amrun calling us scum out the fucking blue with little or no reasoning was pretty derptastic. AJ selectively scumhunting us was pretty bad, too. I'm going to react but I don't think my reaction to ANYTHING has been over the top.In post 1312, Jon Doe wrote:Absolutely not. Wayne laid down the meta case against GiF. As for you, your over the top reactions and general behavior in the thread make me paranoid enough. Then, there is Thor's case which is decent but I don't fully trust Thor. I have bigger fish to fry than you. I might change my mind in the mean time.In post 1281, Sugar Cain wrote:WHAT is this?In post 1274, Jon Doe wrote:Sugar and OGML are both consistent with how the nightkills went down.
This is basically, after the Trust Fund flip, I would expect scum to start attacking us hard for no reason. Given the fact both of you have voted us, you being scum is consistent with my view of how the nightkills went down.
So that's the only reason you suspect us other than "Sugar and GIF being the most talked about in the thread"Sugar's voting pattern has been erratic at best.
And again, I'm countering your point. We were already scumreading you on day 1 so your "oh woe is me, we're being attacked 'cause TF died" is nothing but a discredit.Scum attack over the TF kill makes sense. The process goes as follows, kill a failed lynch train, claim the biggest player pushing the train is scum, find whatever reason you can to FoS that player and try to link the kill to them. I figured I'd preempt the scums by highlighting this is a likely play.In post 1357, Sugar Cain wrote:Also note, that our hydra was scumreading John Doe on day 1 as well. Their claim that they are being attacked over the Trust Fund kill is stupid stupid stupid.
Why you think that scum would attack you over the TF kill?