Page 56 of 266

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:38 pm
by Eddard Stark
Day 1, Vc 37

PrideandJoy (1) -
Amrun
ooba (9) -
Alfred Borden, quadz08, PrideandJoy, AGar, Shadoweh, Tierce, Tammy, StupendousMan, Goat on a Raft
StupendousMan (1)-
Nautilius
Thor665 (4) -
Benmage, elleheathen, kanyeknowsbest, macmollie
Goat on a Raft (1) -
Zdenek
Zdenek (1) -
Messiah Complex
Garruk Relentless (2) -
SafetyDance, Cephrir
SafetyDance (2) -
Syryana, Garruk Relentless
Amrun (1) -
Thor665
Shadoweh (1) -
ooba

Not voting (1)
- displaced

With 24 alive it takes 13 votes to lynch
  • Deadline Date: 1st of October at 17:05 EDT
  • Deadline Countdown: (expired on 2013-10-01 17:05:01)
  • Thor and ooba are V/la


Prodding Messiah Complex.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:48 pm
by Nautilius
Why try to lynch this?
In post 999, Messiah Complex wrote:@ Nautilus: why are you resorting to Stup already after you said you wanted to give them some room?
My reach out was rejected.
In post 1014, Tammy wrote:Holy wall wars 2013!
Tammy please stop playing like this.
In post 1078, Tierce wrote:Also you made me realize that this game is far too long for me to not have read it thoroughly lately but now I'm having too much fun spiting Nacho~
Better not spite me too much or you'll be dead before you know it!
In post 1113, AGar wrote:15/45, I'm going to stab the next person who speaks directly to a head of a hydra.
mollie is macmollie.
In post 1133, Syryana wrote:he's very serious, almost formal.
??????
In post 1133, Syryana wrote:Hell, he's so profoundly literal this game that he latches onto my mollie troll, takes it seriously, and proceeds to agree with the dislike of lurking
Remember how Ceph thought ffery wasn't posting enough in Hard Boiled? Yeah.
In post 1153, macmollie wrote:
In post 812, Nautilius wrote: quadz vote = mac
DENIED

amrun vote = mac?
DENIED

#470 = mac
DENIED

#568 = mac
DENIED


I miss him :(
I wanna chat with him. Can you bring him out to play too?
DENIED
0/4 correct :( you cut me deep nacho
COME PLAY WITH ME
In post 1157, Shadoweh wrote:I think I know what it is about your posts that bugs me in general, spacing everything out to make the posts look bigger was something I did as scum, it doesn't make the post easier to read you know. <_< This is really confusing though, what are you talking about and what does it have to do with syr being scum? I don't mean him confusing your scumbuddy for being town, I mean the random line about 'someone was kind to me once' followed by you already giving up on lynching scum (even though your thor wagon is proceeding semi-decently?) I mean would you be convinced by your own posts to vote syr?
why aren't you getting married?
why are you so thoroughly ignoring me?
In post 1197, macmollie wrote:maybe bring death to these (but also: to be discussed):
i wanna kill sd/stup
can you help me accomplish this?
Why?
In post 1354, Alfred Borden wrote:Really? If anything, I found the replace out townish, especially the "Tierce is town though, I just wanted to be a bit more careful with things" bit -- mostly the fact that he felt the need to explain what he was doing there in his early interaction with Tierce and the result he got from it as he was leaving. I think as scum he'd have just left it at "my reads are the same as before" as that doesn't really give away much information considering the early game nature of the reads.
AGar looks town.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:45 pm
by macmollie
okay I had typed up a huge long post that was eaten by the ethers.

and that is all I am going to say about that.

but anyways, I have town as

naut
kanye
alfred
elle
messiah
syrlacious
I have tammy, mac isn't convinced.

I realised when I was looking at things earlier that agar replaced andrius and not pb. it changes things a bit.

if people are wondering why I am so paranoid of thor it is cos I have been on a cult team with him twice and was horrifyingly fascinated at how good he was persuading people to go against their better judgment. it was like watching a really good episode of the national geographic channel.

I may try to recompose my big long post but I make no promises.

would like to see naut/kanye interaction cos you are the strongest town reads.

@ naut

mac and (me too actually and I will put us v/la status) work on weekends he will be back on monday. I will be here intermittently.

will talk to mac about the ooba wagon but so far we are like :/ unsure cos he was slightly out of step but not completely I simply don't know.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:55 pm
by Thor665
In post 1355, AGar wrote:Also, Thor... I asked a preeeeetty specific question in #1252. And you didn't answer it. You give me a sad. (Yes, I re-read Ceph, no I don't like it for lynching. No, I haven't re-read Amrun just yet, yes that's next on the list.)
Yes, you asked me a question, I responded here;
In post 1269, Thor665 wrote:@AGar - a Day 1 lynchbait? Are you serious? Look at the player list, we don't need to be limiting ourself to culling at this stage and it seems silly to choose to do so. Neither of them are being pro town, which is the basic impetus of your Ooba push, but add in Amrun's awkward defense of me or Ceph's aggressive refusal to actually look at motivation and I think they both look worse objectively.
The other part of your question was "I refuse to lynch either of your scumreads (because I don't consider them lynchbait worthy on Day 1...which is a meaningless answer to their scumminess) - who else should we lynch?" Which...is not really a question I can answer functionally.
Hey, AGar, I refuse to lynch anyone you think is scum - who should we lynch? All that is going to get is you randomly picking some meh null read and...what, trying to act excited about that as a compromise lynch wagon of 2?
No.
Also, functionally, I had asked you to defend your position that I disagreed with, and you didn't - making *you* the one breaking the conversation chain (and, indeed, trying to go backwards in it) So...whut?
In post 1356, macmollie wrote:thor since when have you ever thought any of my logic was valid? name 1 other time in a game that you ever thought that something I said was valid or had anything to do with logic much less have any merit to it?
:roll:
In my very next sentence after the one you are freaking out about, I said you had no logic with what you were saying.
So I said you had a good setup, and then were trying to sell me on something with no logic.
And now I'm scum because I don't think you lack logic...even if that WAS a tell on me, I plainly didn't do it, so...?
In post 1373, quadz08 wrote:oh

oh my god

you
literally
just said "you don't think I'm a complete moron, therefore you are scum."
That is par for the course with her for cases - it's actually not really any worse than the logic she used to call Nacho scum "he's able to read Tierce, and Tierce is acting scummy towards him, ergo they are scum buddies...I will ignore that maybe he's acting neutral towards her because he doesn't think she is acting scummy...oh, look, he even clarified why he thinks I'm reading her play wrong...watch how I ignore that conversation as well...yay!"

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 11:52 pm
by StupendousMan
This post right here. What do you think of ooba?

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:13 am
by displaced
OK read up now, sorry it took so long but that was a lotalot of words to read

VOTE: goat

for voting a townread because 'flips are needed' when a null read of his also has a viable wagon

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:06 am
by ooba
Ok im here. Give me a sec to catch up on everything..

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:08 am
by Benmage
*yawn*

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:09 am
by Benmage
unvote vote ooba
bloooooood

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:10 am
by Benmage
oh wait,
unvote vote thor

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:15 am
by Thor665
Benmage actually seems to be playing worse than Mollie in this game.
That is sad.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:18 am
by quadz08
In post 1380, displaced wrote:OK read up now, sorry it took so long but that was a lotalot of words to read

VOTE: goat

for voting a townread because 'flips are needed' when a null read of his also has a viable wagon
you're kidding, right? that's all you've got after 50-odd pages?

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:18 am
by Benmage
^Says scum.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:18 am
by Benmage
errr there was no pdeit.. that was to thor.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:24 am
by Thor665
Brilliant rebuttal of my position.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:31 am
by macmollie
thor since when have you ever thought any of my logic was valid? name 1 other time in a game that you ever thought that something I said was valid or had anything to do with logic much less have any merit to it? in fact that is the whole reason as to why you always want to pl me and why we fight it is cos you say you can never understand a single thing I say. you're scum aren't you? oh god that is why you have been so civil isn't it?

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:33 am
by ooba
@Shadow: LvE was a game in hich i made a single "catching up soon" and then quit.

Agar's post makes some valid sounding points. However the post toally ignores playstyle. I play this way as town - i post reads, when they flip - i quote my own reads and say "Hey i tagged em as scum here". The difference in this game is that the pace has been unrelenting so ive never had time to do a complete reread that i usually do.

Not sure where elles getting the paranoia thing. I'm paranoid when i get to late game and setup speculation, not early game.

Also "reactive" is a function of how many people attack me - i always respond to cases.

I reverse my read on shadoweh.

Tierce is a scumread that wont get lynched today.
Garruks scum.
^ lynch either of them - they will flip scum

Let me look at the VC before voting.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:35 am
by Thor665
In post 1390, macmollie wrote:
thor since when have you ever thought any of my logic was valid? name 1 other time in a game that you ever thought that something I said was valid or had anything to do with logic much less have any merit to it? in fact that is the whole reason as to why you always want to pl me and why we fight it is cos you say you can never understand a single thing I say. you're scum aren't you? oh god that is why you have been so civil isn't it?
:neutral:
I already responded to this.
If you're derp enough to still think it is a scumtell than parade on, I don't care enough to bother looking through games for points I did or didn't mock your logic.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:36 am
by ooba
Thats easy. Thor is not someone i want lynched today. SafetyDance either.

unvote. Vote: Garruk


Those of you who think im town and are on single vote wagons would do well to consolidate.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:42 am
by Syryana
UNVOTE:
VOTE: ooba

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:51 am
by Goat on a Raft
In post 1380, displaced wrote:OK read up now, sorry it took so long but that was a lotalot of words to read

VOTE: goat

for voting a townread because 'flips are needed' when a null read of his also has a viable wagon
8 > 4

What do you think about ooba?
What do you think about Thor?
What do you think about ... you get the picture.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:06 am
by macmollie
In post 1395, Goat on a Raft wrote:
In post 1380, displaced wrote:OK read up now, sorry it took so long but that was a lotalot of words to read

VOTE: goat

for voting a townread because 'flips are needed' when a null read of his also has a viable wagon
8 > 4

What do you think about ooba?
What do you think about Thor?
What do you think about ... you get the picture.
the irony of this post is most astounding

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:10 am
by Goat on a Raft
In post 1396, macmollie wrote:the irony of this post is most astounding
Sure, it's a direct parallel.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:25 am
by Benmage
In post 1389, Thor665 wrote:Brilliant rebuttal of my position.
Rebutting some subjective undermining jive :lol: :lol: .

I could've said "blue" in response to your useless nonsense, and it would have been better than the mud you espouse.

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:28 am
by Benmage
In post 1393, ooba wrote: Thor is not someone i want lynched today.
Why?