Mafiascum.net

I think he's town. I read his posts and they seem like thoughts that I'm having. I don't see any scum motivation there.

And I feel like Nero's answers back to me were bad. He was oddly touchy. However it wasn't the kind of touchiness that I would expect from him when he was saying that he was habitually touchy. It was more like an immediate attempt to discredit me rather than discern an alignment there.

PEDIT:
Did he scum claim or something and I missed it? I've sorta tuned out these last couple pages of hydraspam.

Wow, Mhork. I was joking when I asked whether you were his buddy or not, but now I'm not so sure. Why do you keep deflecting?

Sorry I'm just really irritated with the spam. I try to get into a game, but the sheer volume is turning me off. I hate lurkering my way through games but it's really hard for me to not try to do that now.

My point still stands on Nero though.

Quit the pity party. I don't give a shit about Nero right now. I asked you your opinion on what I had to say about Voided and your reply is "I don't want to read your posts hey why don't we look at Nero instead"

Dude it wasn't a pity party. I thought the deflection comment was at the hydraspam part so I was explaining my distaste for the spam and why it was a big deal to me.

And no. I'm not going to sift through the tons of posts that you have been making because I don't have that kind of time or energy. If you had conclusive proof on Voided being totally caught scum, you'd be rubbing it in my face now. So until you give me that conclusive evidence, I'm going to stay on my Nero vote. I'm very comfortable with him being scum.

You're still refusing to read the last page?

Are you always this bad as scum?

That game was bullshit >.>

Yes I'm refusing to read the page. Sue me. If you have evidence, post it again. I'm not sifting through hydraspam.

I can't find any other scum games. I've found a few town ones, where you last until quite late so obviously you don't just get lynched early every game.

In post 1383, Lord Mhork wrote:That game was bullshit >.>

Yes I'm refusing to read the page. Sue me. If you have evidence, post it again. I'm not sifting through hydraspam.

Mhork, you are literally generating more of the same sort of spam you're complaining about.

In post 1384, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:I've found a few town ones, where you last until quite late so obviously you don't just get lynched early every game.

(for anyone else interested: I'm talking about http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=28756 and http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31030)

Well I haven't rolled scum since my minihiatus I don't think, and the couple scum games are part of the reason for the minihiatus. Unfortunately you can't meta my scum game until I get scum again.

But this isn't my scum game. If I were scum, I'd just coast by lurking and promising vague catch up posts.

PEDIT:
._.
Well this'll prolly be my last post for the night anyway.

Would you guys be angry if I replaced out

This game is just weighing me down, but I don't want to burden someone to read 50 pages while I only need to read 20

mhork wrote:dribble

drivel*

^V wrote:What's Nero done?

this is actually the point. what Nero done?

he's obviously following the thread, at least well enough that he can comment on minor things here and there sprinkled throughout the thread, yet he's managed to avoid commenting on every major event, and avoid mentioning most of the people who are playing this game. not only that, but when you look at the reasons for the few reads he's actually given, they're pretty fucking shit. nero's being a non-presence in this game. nothing to do with his post count and everything to do with him coasting on little content.

the argument he had with mhork is just the icing on the cake, here, and i don't know how people think Nero came out looking better from that. did any of you actually look at Nero's argument there?

the only good thing i can see in nero's iso is a voided vote, but i'm having second thoughts about voided atm so i'm not even sure that's a good thing.

In post 1363, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:<snip>
Hmm no that's not what you quoted at all.
<snip>
VOTE: Voided

was this the straw that broke the camel's back or is this the only reason you think voided is scum?

With 20 alive, it takes 11 to lynch.

VoidedMafia (5): morph the cat, BBmolla, 1baldeagle1, Klick, uʍop ǝpısdn
Lord Mhork (2): Nero Cain, Zdenek
Klick (2): Garuda, Seanald
Nero Cain (2): Lord Mhork, zMuffinMan
Seanald (1): PeregrineV
morph the cat (1): Pyrotechnics
1baldeagle1 (1): VoidedMafia
uʍop ǝpısdn (1): ProHawk

Not Voting (5): pieguyn, Lost Butterfly, Banakai, DoctorPepper, Harakiri

Deadline for Day 2 is Friday, November 1st, at 2:00pm EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:

hi o/
reading

In post 1290, zMuffinMan wrote:

nero wrote:Other good wagons are Mhork and Harakiri

if your reasons for thinking harakiri is scum are the same as they were at the end of yesterday, then meh. what are your other reads/thoughts?

I think you are playing like normal crappy Muffin.
Gotta re-read my old games with Tammy to see if Tammyscum is normally this whiney.
50/50 on Klick.
50/50 on Sean, atleast he's correctly reading me as town.
Hawk is prob town.
DP is active lurking, could be scum.
ZD is prob town.
PV, LB, Nacho hydra, cat, upside down are prob town as well.
Iffy on Bald.
Everyone else is null.

nero wrote:I felt like the reasoning used "oh you didn't use the word obv-town yesterday" was twisting.

that had nothing to do with why anyone thinks/thought prohawk is scum.

Oh really.

In post 915, Klick wrote:ProHawk's answer is pretty poor. He pretty clearly didn't think Hermy was obvious town.

I'd rather Voided not escape a lynch today, though. I'd support either.

In post 932, Harakiri wrote:Re: 927.

None of those seem to indicate you thought they were obvtown, just obvnewbie, the last one says you didnt think they were scum, but that's as good as saying they are null.

~Sakura Hana

In post 1325, BBmolla wrote:

In post 674, Nero Cain wrote:Sean/Mhork ain't gonna happen today. Harakiri is scum and we should kill it.

NC what happened to this dude

Still scum.

In post 1328, Pyrotechnics wrote:

In post 1270, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1265, Lord Mhork wrote:Hehehe... You're funny, Nero. Do you always flip out or just as scum?

I'm not flipping out just calling you on your shit.

Why aren't you yelling at people Nero?

You are clearly not reading. Why are you not reading?

In post 1330, Voidedmafia wrote:

In post 1263, Nero Cain wrote:I'm always "touchy" wich is why I make a good mislynch target for scum.

What I mean is that once mhork comments on how you posted after he voted, you immediately jump to the conclusion that he was implying that his vote brought you here when I don't feel like that was even the case. I guess I can understand that you might find that implication, but it feels like a big reach to me.

So what did you think was his point then? IIOA? He was just pointing out that my post came after his vote.

In post 1375, Lord Mhork wrote: And I feel like Nero's answers back to me were bad.

Are you the pot or the kettle?

In post 1377, Lord Mhork wrote:My point still stands on Nero though.

You have no point.

In post 1388, Banakai wrote:Would you guys be angry if I replaced out

This game is just weighing me down, but I don't want to burden someone to read 50 pages while I only need to read 20

I rather like this post.

lol @ Muffin. For a guy that normally calls me scum he'll be right one game but this is not that game.

nero wrote:I think you are playing like normal crappy Muffin.

flattery will get you nowhere

1264 was a horrible post. even by nero standards. especially the last line.

In post 1271, Lord Mhork wrote:So what happened to you liking me yesterday?

This has what to do with anything?

Lemme ask you a question Muffin. If you had not been on for awhile and in that time spam someone voted you and the next time you got on to post and then the person that voted was "I like how you posted after I voted you." What do you think that would mean?

I also advertised $3 on Love Potion and vote freezer

pro tip: If you are town then you should stop your derp tunnel and find scum. If you are scum feel free to carry on.

nero wrote:What do you think that would mean?

i dunno. that they think i'm scum who's lurking? i wouldn't think of it as anything significant, especially if someone did that to me when i'm town. and i certainly wouldn't be like, "omg you're a fucking liar, i totally didn't post after you voted me!" when that clearly was the case.

mhork is right. what he said . maybe not a significant fact, but a fact nonetheless. you overreacting to it is funny. the last line of 1264 is especially horrible because it implies you actually think voided is town.

wait you... advertised love potion and vote freezer?

In post 1397, zMuffinMan wrote:

nero wrote:What do you think that would mean?

i dunno. that they think i'm scum who's lurking? i wouldn't think of it as anything significant, especially if someone did that to me when i'm town. and i certainly wouldn't be like, "omg you're a fucking liar, i totally didn't post after you voted me!" when that clearly was the case.

mhork is right. what he said

is a fact

. maybe not a significant fact, but a fact nonetheless. you overreacting to it is funny. the last line of 1264 is especially horrible because it implies you actually think voided is town.

So.....you'd think it would mean they are calling you lurking scum but when I think the same thing its wrong? Mhork voting me had like 0 to do with me coming and posting the fact you think that is just fucking retarded. There's also no over reaction. I'm town, I don't know Mhork's alignment. I don't think there's any other explanation for "I like how posted after I voted you" other than implying that his vote made me post. The fact that he's denying this is straight up scum.

This also looks very similar to what you did in Lord of the Rings mafia so meh you can die too.