Mafiascum.net

Pleas tell me you know that guy in the picture.

LoL

In post 1376, Trekkie99 wrote:Pleas tell me you know that guy in the picture.

Kevin Costner in the bodyguard, yes. I thought you were just throwing a random pick

Who have you targeted?

In post 1369, NotMySpamAccount wrote:

In post 1368, TTTT wrote:

In post 1367, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I'm a troll, but I'm a lazy troll. Not a madly anti-town troll.

full claim cards plz

watcher, VT, parrot role. watcher for alignment, vt for role, discard parrot role. before you ask why I didn't take watcher, it was because I'm both lazy and a troll.

there's only one Town Watcher card so I'm kinda buying this claim

godfather is admittedly better than bg for a mafia
so trekkie prolly not mafia

In post 1380, TTTT wrote:

In post 1369, NotMySpamAccount wrote:

In post 1368, TTTT wrote:

In post 1367, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I'm a troll, but I'm a lazy troll. Not a madly anti-town troll.

full claim cards plz

watcher, VT, parrot role. watcher for alignment, vt for role, discard parrot role. before you ask why I didn't take watcher, it was because I'm both lazy and a troll.

there's only one Town Watcher card so I'm kinda buying this claim

could be scum watcher though

In post 1379, pinturicchio wrote:Who have you targeted?

Blooper never submitted a name for night one so I protected irrelephant night one and wisdom last night.

In post 1382, Wisdom wrote: could be scum watcher though

the claim is he used town watcher for
my point is that it's an unnecessarily risky claim
with only one town watcher card in the deck

In post 1385, TTTT wrote:

In post 1382, Wisdom wrote: could be scum watcher though

the claim is he used town watcher for

alignment

my point is that it's an unnecessarily risky claim
with only one town watcher card in the deck

But your saying hes probably town because of the risk for being cced?

But

HE could have had Parrot, Town Watcher, Scum X

Discard Parrot, Scum for alignment, Watcher for role?

In post 1385, TTTT wrote:

In post 1382, Wisdom wrote: could be scum watcher though

the claim is he used town watcher for

alignment

my point is that it's an unnecessarily risky claim
with only one town watcher card in the deck

Yeah and im saying, if he used it for role, he knows its safe

I don’t believe nmsa

In post 1384, Trekkie99 wrote:

In post 1379, pinturicchio wrote:Who have you targeted?

Blooper never submitted a name for night one so I protected irrelephant night one and wisdom last night.

Can you explain why you picked these targets

In post 1389, ofrhz wrote:

In post 1384, Trekkie99 wrote:

In post 1379, pinturicchio wrote:Who have you targeted?

Blooper never submitted a name for night one so I protected irrelephant night one and wisdom last night.

Can you explain why you picked these targets

Irrelephant was kind of a quick random name I picked cause I hadn't read the game yet and just wanted to get a action in, and wisdom cause I think he's town who might be a juicy target for scum.

In post 1386, Shadowlesscloud wrote: But your saying hes probably town because of the risk for being cced?

But

HE could have had Parrot, Town Watcher, Scum X

Discard Parrot, Scum for alignment, Watcher for role?

you are correct, sir

In post 1391, TTTT wrote:

In post 1386, Shadowlesscloud wrote: But your saying hes probably town because of the risk for being cced?

But

HE could have had Parrot, Town Watcher, Scum X

Discard Parrot, Scum for alignment, Watcher for role?

you are correct, sir

Then why do you believe his claim? Or do you just believe he had the watcher card?

I stand corrected
NMSA you should die for...
a) being scum
b) being town who chose VT over a PR

In post 1392, Shadowlesscloud wrote:Then why do you believe his claim? Or do you just believe he had the watcher card?

yeah I don't believe it
just needed you guys to explain it to me like I'm 6 years old

I'd kill to be able to see your faces irl when I flip town, they'll be priceless.

In post 1393, TTTT wrote:I stand corrected
NMSA you should die for...
a) being scum
b) being town who chose VT over a PR

Wisdom's point about scum watcher is pretty good, and your point of NMSA being town who chose VT over PR is right, but I think the best course of action is looking more players in depth for now. I think the big mistake we have commited since D1 is focusing in only one or two players instead of looking at the rest of the playerlist, and maybe that's because we got cocky for lynching Elsa D1.

I'm like, 80% not believing NMSA's claim with Wisdom's point, but that's not enough. I have counterpoints: NMSA's play on the previous GM was different and he chose a 3p that game; he was the first wagon and the first shot of the game by our vig, so discarding parrot to then claim VT is like calling attention all over again and not learning from his discards' mistakes from the previous game.

In post 1396, pinturicchio wrote:

In post 1393, TTTT wrote:I stand corrected
NMSA you should die for...
a) being scum
b) being town who chose VT over a PR

Wisdom's point about scum watcher is pretty good, and your point of NMSA being town who chose VT over PR is right, but I think the best course of action is looking more players in depth for now. I think the big mistake we have commited since D1 is focusing in only one or two players instead of looking at the rest of the playerlist, and maybe that's because we got cocky for lynching Elsa D1.

I'm like, 80% not believing NMSA's claim with Wisdom's point, but that's not enough. I have counterpoints: NMSA's play on the previous GM was different and he chose a 3p that game; he was the first wagon and the first shot of the game by our vig, so discarding parrot to then claim VT is like calling attention all over again and not learning from his discards' mistakes from the previous game.

yeah, I payed attention to discards this time, that's why I didn't discard watcher, it would look too scummy.

Sigh
I’m believing NMSA in spite of myself

In post 1397, NotMySpamAccount wrote:

In post 1396, pinturicchio wrote:

In post 1393, TTTT wrote:I stand corrected
NMSA you should die for...
a) being scum
b) being town who chose VT over a PR

Wisdom's point about scum watcher is pretty good, and your point of NMSA being town who chose VT over PR is right, but I think the best course of action is looking more players in depth for now. I think the big mistake we have commited since D1 is focusing in only one or two players instead of looking at the rest of the playerlist, and maybe that's because we got cocky for lynching Elsa D1.

I'm like, 80% not believing NMSA's claim with Wisdom's point, but that's not enough. I have counterpoints: NMSA's play on the previous GM was different and he chose a 3p that game; he was the first wagon and the first shot of the game by our vig, so discarding parrot to then claim VT is like calling attention all over again and not learning from his discards' mistakes from the previous game.

yeah, I payed attention to discards this time, that's why I didn't discard watcher, it would look too scummy.

You claim you had 3 town cards

and you didnt discard the "VT"

It looks scummy