Mafiascum.net

In post 1372, Blatant Scum wrote:Creature, use spoilers for the quotes, please.

Ah the spoiler supremacy

Kinda tired rn to continue. I already have a pile of sketchy players (in increasing order of postcount): Bingle, Calvin, votato and farside

I have yet to check the players above votato and farside. Some of them looked pretty sketchy too

Then vote fotahdo.

Have fun sorting Bingle.

In post 1374, PenguinPower wrote:Yeah...not seeing it.

Says "RVS" on the L-1 and a naked vote is confident how?

If you were unsure about your position in the game, balancing between scumlean and townlean, would you do it?

In post 1378, PenguinPower wrote:Then vote fotahdo.

No, he claims to be confirmable

He was mocking my claim.

He's not Town confirmable.

In post 1380, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 1374, PenguinPower wrote:Yeah...not seeing it.

Says "RVS" on the L-1 and a naked vote is confident how?

If you were unsure about your position in the game, balancing between scumlean and townlean, would you do it?

You are attributing way too much to his posts.

Also, I don't play anything like Dunn so what I would do doesn't really matter here (though, yes, I would definitely enter a game and put someone at L-1 and naked vote someone else).

In post 1352, Creature wrote:votato looks sketchy and so does his claim, but his insistence on being comfortable looks genuine and he also seems annoyed at being wagoned. Perhaps I'd leave him at the top of the not-so-town tier (votato > Bingle > Calvin)

I understand the genuine argument with his posting and would say that's probably his most townie quality content wise.

I disagree about being annoyed with the wagon though = town. I dont feel the frustration he displayed coming from town PoV with the example being the opening statement on his reads list where he accused people of not caring about his reads.

I feel town! Would be more aggressive with that thought and actively start questioning people about it to see if their accusers/the people judging their slot is town or scum. Votato didnt so that. He gave a passive comment about it and then proceeded to not follow up with that train of thought in a manner that indicates town. It does, however, make more sense coming from scum!votato. That passive style coupled with his reads from that post which are also quite passive (me being aggressive and optimistic yet no read. Pp being weird yet not directly calling him scum etc.) Leads me to feel its scum!votato

In post 1381, Creature wrote:

In post 1378, PenguinPower wrote:Then vote fotahdo.

No, he claims to be confirmable

Yes. If he AND April can predict where mafia strikes.

In post 1357, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 1342, HoldenGolden wrote:

In post 1262, April Ludgate wrote:We literally can confirm the role, votato votes are scummy.

And if a role block comes in somewhere then it’s confirmed roleblock and we can lynch votato tomorrow.

No we realistically cannot given his addtional information about his role.

Town votato would be a prime target to get roleblocked. Scum votato can just claim to be rbed. Thus votato claiming to be roleblocked day 2 would be NAI.

If we do somehow coordinate a town KP, you, and votato (who all have to be town for it to work) all on the same person without scum interference, then we all should laugh before beating the scum team for being incompetent.

Tldr: the only way town!votato can be confirmed given what we know is if the scum team makes a mistake (or they dont have a roleblocker/way to stop it). As such the plan to confirm him is far too risky since scum!votato can lie about the rb and then the town KP needed to set it all off kills the target. It can be minimized I guess by choosing a scummy person to kill theoretically, but then that's also going down the rabbit hole of further role speculation.

Wastling a vigi shot probably isn't worth confirming votato.

Also, depends on how you use it.

I think if the bullet confirms his dead unicorn corpse it wouldnt be wasted

I'm fine lynching votato/bird (I'm not feeling their reactions post wagon pile up)/PP (who seems more worried about telling people their scumread on him is wrong)

That pool can grow and shift quite a lot especially depending on how clover and JJ responses. Clover bugged me for pushing the DEB read before actually providing evidence of his claim that I asked for. JJ for his Pp read which effects both his and pps standings in the pool.

Dunn/chem are lurker lynches imo.

In post 1385, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 1381, Creature wrote:

In post 1378, PenguinPower wrote:Then vote fotahdo.

No, he claims to be confirmable

Yes. If he AND April can predict where mafia strikes.

I mean I could help as town's 1 shot mafia goon confused miller, but april has been mean to me

I'm telling people who scumread me they haven't read the game because I AM LITERALLY MOD CONFRIMABLE AS TOWN and have said this.

But sure, include the MOD CONFIRMABLE player in your lynchpool.

And you wonder why April has been mean to you.

why should we put weight in you saying you're mod confirmable without you actually being mod confirmed?

Got em coach.
-----
I got the message PP from the godfather post. Once it/if it happens, then you shall be removed. It's that simple.

Until the mod actually confirms you, it's a game of trust. Your hyper focus on proving to people about the confirm status bothers me. If you want me to trust you more, than use the fact you have the power to mod confirm yourself and push reads outside of Votato. The only one put forward so far by your own accord was the Dunn read. The rest have been in response to people calling you out.

So who's town? Who's your other scum reads? Answer BS question, what's your lynch pool?

In post 1391, votato wrote:why should we put weight in you saying you're mod confirmable without you actually being mod confirmed?

Even the unicorn gets it.

Because I can prove it through the moderator and it doesn't require any sort of coordination of activities? Wow...great question.

Target me tonight with any action and the mod tells you that I am town + you get a sick gif of my choosing.

In post 1392, HoldenGolden wrote:Your hyper focus on proving to people about the confirm status bothers me.

Uh....my focus is getting fotahdo lynched and I've literally only responded to one maybe two people about my town status but keep twisting your narrative to suit your needs.

also, it seems really strange to include a role that has the capacity to be mod-confirmed day 1, and has incentive do to it so easily that when theres even the slightest amount of pressure, with no wagon, the player claims.

wow...like innocent child is a role?

I mean - the purpose of mod confirmable roles is to get....mod confirmed? Given my is reflexive in nature it makes sense to try and....get mod confirmed?

Oh yeah - I'm a natural animal in case that affects targeting in some way.