Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 2:17 am
Adorable is another name that has gotten heat
This is probably scum.In post 550, VaultDweller wrote:Ok, I see the so-called fake townslip. My first thought was that it was a joke post, but nowhere did they state that it was a joke post. At least from what I could read. So yeah, that makes it kind of scummy, especially with the link Pooky gave: (viewtopic.php?p=12236870#p12236870). I will abstain from voting for now though, with the wagon so close to being hammered and the day only 24 hours old.
Yeah, you don't seem like a particularly fun person to play with based on this. I saw you had 200 posts, so hopefully they're not just all flinging abuse.In post 601, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Your inability to read me is tilting me off the face of the earth.
I don't even know what meta bullshit game you are referencing to get this weird "tell" on me that wouldn;'t work even if I WAS SCUM (you moron)
but let me make this fucking really simple for you.
I'm going to die this game you fucking dummy. There's a 0 percent chance I live to endgame.
Fuck's sakes, like. How are you this dense?
Or is it this was a distraction or something?
IDFK
The lack of follow up here is scummy/too scummy to be scummy hm.In post 605, Lapsa wrote:Frankly speaking - this game's a garbage so far.
To an extent of people openly claiming scum and getting away with that.
ok these are good readsIn post 1374, MURDERCAT wrote:Mush looks like town, I think fidget looks like town, hot take is that taylor seems like town
consensus-er?In post 1376, Vaxkiller wrote:LLD's posts do look pretty town, quick glance at her voting looks genuine.
isn't the pro scum play here to just. bus Noraa and get LLD and misdirect LLDIn post 1377, Hopkirk wrote:This is probably scum.
Numbers are something like this, I didn't check this so 1 might not add up right. If so just throw in a balancing β and we're fine.In post 685, Zdenek wrote:Made it to page 15.
Bell, I feel like I should be town reading you, after pages 7,8. Could you say something that will make be not be concerned by you?
I think Swift is probably town, and I think that Noraa-Swift scum buddies would be shocking.
What was your opinion of that game - it was one of the few that I looked at since signing up for this one. My own impression was that Noraa’s win really was quite lucky. Also, LLD, can you clarify what was said on the discord server? Preferrably in a way that town!Noraa would be bound to agree with.In post 265, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You don't get to use this excuse after you won that other scumgame against very competent players.
Hopkirk, what were those numbers anyway?
My top three scum reads are Noraa, Owen and Bell.
Nope.In post 688, Bell wrote:Are you for real with this and the flailing thing. I feel like you can’t be given the number of games you’ve played just from sheer blocks being knocked over after building them up.
Zdenek: I genuinely don’t know what you want me to say from that post. It just looks like you’re fence sitting.
In post 691, UNOwen wrote:What's this all about?In post 685, Zdenek wrote: My top three scum reads are Noraa, Owen and Bell.
This is the slot that needs flak for the Noraa scumread. Trying to give an image they've had that read from the start when I don't see anything I like on the progression post rvs. Scum Uno here can't unvote at that point and is locked in, but I haven't seen a sincere pivot or deepening of the read.In post 708, UNOwen wrote:I disagree my slot is content free. It has a juicy and filling Noraa scum read, I do not expect to vote elsewhere until she is cursed.In post 703, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:UNOwen is here! Quick, get 'em!
UNOwen, I would like your opinions. All of them (that are relevant to the game). I would like them soon, because right now your slot is /content free/. Zero calories. No fat, sugar, artificial flavors, natural flavors. 100% empty.
If there is something specific you'd like me to opine about, ask and I will provide.
ehhhhIn post 1383, Hopkirk wrote:A decent part of my Zdenek townread, looking to be one of my spicier reads atm, is that blatantly bad 'we should do this strategy' style posts come from newbtown from a good place (which I get in the tone of their follow ups to me in regard to it), not newbscum trying to fake content.
This is what I feel like is happening with Pooky tbh. But this exactly why I want to just do Noraa and work off that. Like I said, let LLD work and sorry through it all laterIn post 1381, shellyc wrote:isn't the pro scum play here to just. bus Noraa and get LLD and misdirect LLDIn post 1377, Hopkirk wrote:This is probably scum.
murder you're scum reading Pooky?In post 1386, MURDERCAT wrote:This is what I feel like is happening with Pooky tbh. But this exactly why I want to just do Noraa and work off that. Like I said, let LLD work and sorry through it all later
It's more like there's a lot of worlds where Pooky is scum here, and I can see motivation for Pooky trying to get in early with me and LLD. Like I can easily see how Pooky could be scum, if that makes sense.In post 1387, shellyc wrote:murder you're scum reading Pooky?
Im with Hopkirk, that was kinda scummy.In post 1381, shellyc wrote:isn't the pro scum play here to just. bus Noraa and get LLD and misdirect LLDIn post 1377, Hopkirk wrote:This is probably scum.
This is part of why I think Tayl0r is townIn post 1391, Vaxkiller wrote:As far as scum using LLD, If they were smart, they would steer clear of that
In post 735, shellyc wrote:UNO i would like these names arranged in order of town -> scum
shellyc
Mushagana
isis
pooky
LLD
hopkirk
In post 738, shellyc wrote:im getting major gut townvibes from hopkirk btw, based on the resistance to leashing, the pushing on noraa and reasonable TRs
Isn't this the exact order you wanted to hear though? You picked 4 people you thought were obvtown, one slight town, and one suspicious (all reads you'd said) then Uno's order didn't conflict with that at all. What was your logic behind those specific 6 being the listing?In post 756, shellyc wrote:The LLD read is a consensus read and not too out of place.In post 751, Bell wrote:Reeee why is this insightful.
The Mush read is well-reasoned and logical
The Pooky read is fine since pooky/isis s/s is possible
I would like you to elaborate on hopkirk tho
Ohno, hope you're feeling betty soonIn post 759, Bell wrote:They didn’t give a reason at the time of that post tho and no logic was provided.
Hopkirk I just have trouble reading through the rhymes because i’m not enjoying him like I usually would due to anhedonia.
No I agree with that, treating 2nd scroll holder as town is fairly clearly the way to go.In post 1235, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Nah, UNOwen, it improves town's chances. The values LLD put out are accurate: we kill scum once, twice, or not at all. There's only one possible world where we hit scum twice and only one possible world where we hit scum none. If we hit one scum every time we win before game over. So if we treat the middle player as conftown and work with them, there is no downside: we get to shape the final kill (because we hit town, maximizing chances of a hit on the third, which maximizes chances of hitting two scum if we were lucky with the first scroll-recipient) or we already hit scum (because only scum has no reason to work with us). The mechanics argument is good for improving best outcomes too, don't be too hard on it.
Reread that conversation then tell me if you still think I said what you appear to think I said.In post 1245, Noraa wrote: You really think Taylor is scum here? Taylor standing up for me I generally consider town indicative because she has no business getting herself in hot water for a random townie that's perfect limbait if she's scum. Y'all say the "she wouldn't do this as scum" argument is bad but it literally isn't. I cannot see a single reason for why scum!Taylor would pull this play out right here, right now.
a lot of people
scum would want to shade consensus TRs and I wanted to find that in UNOIn post 1394, Hopkirk wrote:Isn't this the exact order you wanted to hear though? You picked 4 people you thought were obvtown, one slight town, and one suspicious (all reads you'd said) then Uno's order didn't conflict with that at all. What was your logic behind those specific 6 being the listing?