Page 56 of 86

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 7:32 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 1374, Enchant wrote:Why you think Weak Doc is here, when he didn't even try to heal blatant target?
uh because doc probably thought we were in a setup without ninja? and didnt expect the ic to be killed -- a kill on kazyan / me / andre would have been better here (as frame kills // pr reads ) IF ic was not the mechanic kill (for scum i would assume it is) . so i would think doc was on either them

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 7:33 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 1374, Enchant wrote:Why you think Weak Doc is here, when he didn't even try to heal blatant target?
"when he didnt" this implies you are informed of the doc.

are you informed of doc or are you just referring the doc as the royal he?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 7:40 am
by Enchant
In post 1376, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 1374, Enchant wrote:Why you think Weak Doc is here, when he didn't even try to heal blatant target?
"when he didnt" this implies you are informed of the doc.

are you informed of doc or are you just referring the doc as the royal he?

Even if Strongman performed kill, i believe you could saw Doc visit on IC right?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 8:47 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 1377, Enchant wrote:
In post 1376, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 1374, Enchant wrote:Why you think Weak Doc is here, when he didn't even try to heal blatant target?
"when he didnt" this implies you are informed of the doc.

are you informed of doc or are you just referring the doc as the royal he?

Even if Strongman performed kill, i believe you could saw Doc visit on IC right?
i would believe so

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 10:24 am
by Enchant
Then why you think there's even protective?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 10:41 am
by Enchant
Ohhhhhhhhh.

Weak Doctor dies when target mafia. So he could use it as Cop check or so. Fine.

Still can't understand why you think we have exactly him.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 10:45 am
by Nathann
In post 1335, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 1323, Nathann wrote:Whoever Townreads Enchant (DGB I think? Anyone else?), can I get a tl;dr
It's the emotions he's projecting.
Alright, why are the emotions Townie? Scum also gets emotional.
In post 1338, GrandpaMo wrote:okay i claim watcher.

i watched IC and no one performed night actions on them
Why. Why are we now throwing out our claims for no reason?

I'm digging Kazyan's . While it makes sense and I like Kazyan's thought process, I am not sure I fully agree. I guess I just don't often see Scum claiming a TPR for no reason, while under no pressure. Especially since, if a non-Ninja Scum got flipped, that would implicate GrandpaMo, since Watchers in a 2v11 with an IC probably imply Ninjas.
In post 1372, GrandpaMo wrote:1 backup watcher, watcher, 1 ic, weak doc? is probably the setup here 1 ninja (+ mafia protective or 2 ninjas)
...Where is the idea of a Weak Doctor coming from, especially when we just had our IC die? Weak Doctor is basically a Cop, no way there's one in a 2v11. And why would Scum have a protective... Nothing here makes sense.
In post 1375, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 1374, Enchant wrote:Why you think Weak Doc is here, when he didn't even try to heal blatant target?
uh because doc probably thought we were in a setup without ninja? and didnt expect the ic to be killed -- a kill on kazyan / me / andre would have been better here (as frame kills // pr reads ) IF ic was not the mechanic kill (for scum i would assume it is) . so i would think doc was on either them
Nobody had claimed Watched on Day 1. The hypothetical Doctor thinking whether there's a Ninja is completely irrelevant.

I know that earlier in the post I wrote how I don't see Scum claiming Watcher for no reason, but the posts I've read since are making me question if I should trust myself there.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 10:48 am
by Nathann
In post 1324, Not Known 15 wrote:
Vote Count 2.3Titus
Nixie
(3)ssbm_Kyouko;Andresvmb;Nathann;
In post 1333, Kazyan wrote:Whatever, I'll deal with you later.

Hey Titus, how ya doin'? VOTE: Titus
In post 1354, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Titus
In post 1370, GrandpaMo wrote:im confused. i just die tonight lol

VOTE: Titus

both enchant, dgb, and titus all dont believe me.

literally all of the 3 summiest ppl in this game scumreading me kek

dgb if u think its me and titus, i can vote titus today . i dont see who im paired from town's pov if i was scum?

i miss alicek
Please tell me I'm miscounting this.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 10:52 am
by Nathann
I just rechecked, I don't think I am. And I was planning on unvoting because it seemed like the gamestate was happy with the wagon. Here's hoping I was wrong.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 11:43 am
by Titus
I was town. I never got my teeth in this one because it was active on weekends. Still bet scum are on here. Likely towards the back.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:02 pm
by Kazyan
[flips table]

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:27 pm
by Kazyan
I don't have any advice. There was some stuff with DGB and Enchant that makes me think this game is maybe still solvable, but I'll study it over the night phase.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:30 pm
by Titus
One scum on early one late.

11 v 2 mountainous is still crap btw.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:34 pm
by Dwlee99
Titus could be messing with us but she seems genuine and I'm annoyed that one of the only times I've correctly read Titus she gets limmed like this by accident.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:36 pm
by Dwlee99
In post 1387, Titus wrote:One scum on early one late.

11 v 2 mountainous is still crap btw.
I know you didn't really have an opportunity to get into the game but do you have reads beyond this?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:50 pm
by Ythan
Sup looks like the day is over?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:53 pm
by Kazyan
As soon as the mod notices, yeah.

We're about to be in 7 vs 2 mountainous-ish, so we're a little screwed, but I'll effort tonight. Assuming I don't die, anyway.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:56 pm
by Dwlee99
In post 1390, Ythan wrote:Sup looks like the day is over?
There's time if you still want to do something before mod comes back. Have you read?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:57 pm
by Ythan
Skimmed the day basically lemme grab a highlight or two in a second.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:59 pm
by Ythan
In post 1339, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:did i not post here dammit
this was actually my watcher crumb lol

"did i not post here dammit" because i was distracted watching something.
This seems implausible.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:15 pm
by GrandpaMo
In post 1380, Enchant wrote:Ohhhhhhhhh.

Weak Doctor dies when target mafia. So he could use it as Cop check or so. Fine.

Still can't understand why you think we have exactly him.
oh wait im not talking about the modifier "weak" LOL

i forgot there was a modifier of weak ---


in weak meaning a nerfed doc such as 1 shot, novice, etc any modifier that would nerf the ability of a normal doc

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:16 pm
by GrandpaMo
In post 1394, Ythan wrote:
In post 1339, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:did i not post here dammit
this was actually my watcher crumb lol

"did i not post here dammit" because i was distracted watching something.
This seems implausible.
why so?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:20 pm
by GrandpaMo
In post 1381, Nathann wrote:
In post 1335, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 1323, Nathann wrote:Whoever Townreads Enchant (DGB I think? Anyone else?), can I get a tl;dr
It's the emotions he's projecting.
Alright, why are the emotions Townie? Scum also gets emotional.
In post 1338, GrandpaMo wrote:okay i claim watcher.

i watched IC and no one performed night actions on them
Why. Why are we now throwing out our claims for no reason?

I'm digging Kazyan's . While it makes sense and I like Kazyan's thought process, I am not sure I fully agree. I guess I just don't often see Scum claiming a TPR for no reason, while under no pressure. Especially since, if a non-Ninja Scum got flipped, that would implicate GrandpaMo, since Watchers in a 2v11 with an IC probably imply Ninjas.
In post 1372, GrandpaMo wrote:1 backup watcher, watcher, 1 ic, weak doc? is probably the setup here 1 ninja (+ mafia protective or 2 ninjas)
...Where is the idea of a Weak Doctor coming from, especially when we just had our IC die? Weak Doctor is basically a Cop, no way there's one in a 2v11. And why would Scum have a protective... Nothing here makes sense.
In post 1375, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 1374, Enchant wrote:Why you think Weak Doc is here, when he didn't even try to heal blatant target?
uh because doc probably thought we were in a setup without ninja? and didnt expect the ic to be killed -- a kill on kazyan / me / andre would have been better here (as frame kills // pr reads ) IF ic was not the mechanic kill (for scum i would assume it is) . so i would think doc was on either them
Nobody had claimed Watched on Day 1. The hypothetical Doctor thinking whether there's a Ninja is completely irrelevant.

I know that earlier in the post I wrote how I don't see Scum claiming Watcher for no reason, but the posts I've read since are making me question if I should trust myself there.
it makes sense for me to claim here. it makes the dwlee confirmed and becomes almost auto here.

also not true -- if there is a protective somewhere then it would just lie somewhere towards them saving the ic i believe -- maybe roleblocker? who knows... hm actually thinking bout it -- that just makes doc not even likely in this setup? what other role would fit backup / normal / +vt? is it just 2 prs. who knows, it is my first time tryna setup solve and i feel good about it

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:21 pm
by GrandpaMo
In post 1384, Titus wrote:I was town. I never got my teeth in this one because it was active on weekends. Still bet scum are on here. Likely towards the back.
hm..

i hope u arent town

i think if ur town > then enchant is just the scum here

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:41 pm
by Ythan
In post 1396, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 1394, Ythan wrote:
In post 1339, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:did i not post here dammit
this was actually my watcher crumb lol

"did i not post here dammit" because i was distracted watching something.
This seems implausible.
why so?
It looks like that is not a crumb.