Mafiascum.net

And you don't like what I'm posting why?

ur tone sux

-GE

Oh, Bell, did you say something about boxes?

I did.
I opened one and got nada.

-Bell

In post 1378, Icebox wrote:I did.
I opened one and got nada.

-Bell

Were there 3?

gold silver and lead, perhaps?

There were 3.
They were not gold, silver and lead.
they were different types of wood, ironsand, rosewood, camp something.
I picked rosewood.

-Bell

In post 1381, Icebox wrote:There were 3.
They were not gold, silver and lead.
they were different types of wood, ironsand, rosewood, camp something.
I picked rosewood.

-Bell

Hmm.

That sounds like Portia's test from Merchant of Venice.

But the boxes are not the normal boxes. Maybe because it'd be too easy to guess?

Sounds like you guessed wrong? IDK. Maybe something happens when you guess wrong. There was a punishment in the story.

Oh yeah, yep. I definitely failed that test.
They were even called caskets.
Woops.

-Bell

In post 1333, Bowser Jr. wrote:Luckily this is not a court of law

~Spiffy

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is hard to achieve in mafia.

Even though I dislike the Galron claim, it suffices to create reasonable doubt.

In post 1343, Galron wrote:

In post 1333, Bowser Jr. wrote:Luckily this is not a court of law

~Spiffy

If this were a court of law, I'd Rule 56 you and get atty fees for it.

In post 1345, Galron wrote:Or 12(b)(6) you.

Rule 56 is better. It (oversimplifying) says that there's no disagreement as to important facts and the facts support my side. It's unlikely to get attorney's fees for this.

Rule 12(b)(6) applies to an initial complaint that doesn't detail a problem a court can resolve. That doesn't apply as we have the power to eliminate or not.

Rule 11 is the most likely rule that can be applied which is for frivolous motions. Even then you have to give opposing counsel time to withdraw.

I doubt that his gold coins would go towards upgrading his powerful claim further rather than negating his downside which he should have with such a powerful role.

You know, the sticks and stones part of our roles?

VOTE: Dunn

I feel Galron is probably scum, but I agree with the mechanical call more.

I still think that we should kill galron. If that is not happening, I would like to kill OTH

In post 1388, Lukewarm wrote:I still think that we should kill galron. If that is not happening, I would like to kill OTH

No.

In post 1352, Off The Hook wrote: Titus can u explain this for me bestie

-GE

Gamma are you picking up bestie from Marci? lol

In post 1389, Titus wrote:

In post 1388, Lukewarm wrote:I still think that we should kill galron. If that is not happening, I would like to kill OTH

No.

Okay, well my vote is almost certainly riding out on one of the two of them for the foreseeable future.

What are you against a OTH kill?

I think that Gamma's transition to "Dunn has been consistently scummy" when the slot has not expressed a scum read on them a single point before now, right when they likely need to transition away from the potential guilty on their buddy, and dunn is the person who most recently had some thread momentum in his direction is hella sus, and also looks partnery between OTH and the person that likely has a guilty on them now.

Like, here is the last time OTH has mentioned Dunn - and it was to question a scum read on them

In post 892, Off The Hook wrote:

In post 889, WhemeStar wrote:im wiling to vote skybird or dunn

why dunnstral?

~M★

But, when trying to flow with the momentum going in his direction, now they think he has been "consistently scummy" and have apparently just been keeping that to themselves.

In post 1364, Off The Hook wrote:i think having this mindset is not a good thing, i think sometimes coincidences do happen

I also don't think that this is a town thought.

This is not a mechanical "maybe we can eek out a result in case we are wrong" it looks more like,

"lets ignore this double track to two different people who had scum lead actions happen to them, because "coincidences happen""

And that quote is coming from marci, who just expressed a weak scum read on the slot BEFORE the track guilty came out.

I would also like to point out that Marci did the exact same with JC (who, regardless of what some of you want to say is 1000% scum). As soon as JC claimed, she chimed in to try and steer away from it. Marci had no expressed read on JC, Gamma had JC as "nullscum," but when push came to shove, she tried to steer away into skybird

I find it both comedic and bothersome Luke thinks me and marci would sync this poorly if we’re scum
He keeps bitching about our reads but consistently fails to keep track of which head is posting what stances. Atp it’s starting to come off as willful ignorance (read: scummy behavior)

-GE

In post 1397, Off The Hook wrote:I find it both comedic and bothersome Luke thinks me and marci would sync this poorly if we’re scum
He keeps bitching about our reads but consistently fails to keep track of which head is posting what stances. Atp it’s starting to come off as willful ignorance (read: scummy behavior)

-GE

Your excuses are lame and I dont think you really believe luke is scum here.

It is not words that shakes me thus! Pish!