Mafiascum.net

In post 1259, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm a little weirded out all i got was a "I don't fucking know," same with cephrir but maybe i can see that but i'm not sure how i'm floating in anyone's null space atm i can barely keep my damn mouth shut

i think my ultimate bears opinion is they could be scum but maybe not who i want to go after d1. noraa's list is a little problematic for me if fae's had no controversial takes maybe noraa's has too many i guess? maybe? i dunno somehow there's like 7 scum and they turn it into 3 and that's impressive

In post 1356, mastina wrote:Btw side-note, StD v Roden is pretty obviously TvT but I can't really go in as much depth as I'd prefer to there since I'm not sure I'll be able to get caught up yet alone be lucid. I'm running out of time tonight, both before I need sleep and in brain power.)

In post 1372, Roden wrote:Interesting that I have to ISO both of us, and in under two minutes I can find the answer you're looking for while proving your answer doesn't exist.

In post 1361, Val89 wrote:I've already explained that it isn't. I'm not going to explain yet again to you or anyone else.

In post 1276, Grendel wrote: *@Greeting*

In post 283, Greeting wrote:UNVOTE: MUSHSHAGANA

I want to vote

Ircher

, but I'd like a vote count first.

where exactly is your Mush read when you pivoted onto Icher?

In post 1276, Grendel wrote:
Mush stream of thought posts fell genuine enough that I don't really feel him being scum atp. Hope gut doesn't bite my ass on that one lol.

I still feel vuagely scummy vibes in Norwee's general direction.

Greeting feels most scumy to me rn.

In post 1278, Grendel wrote:

In post 547, Greeting wrote:

In post 522, Roden wrote:

In post 520, Arcade Pals wrote:Roden, why do you think Greeting is the best vote for today?

I hate the RVS analysis posts. They made my eyes glaze over and it just read as information-over-analysis to me. It's typically a town tell to me, but there's a thin line between actually town telling and just LAMIST serious analysis posts.

Additionally, I don't think Greeting and LLD are aligned, and since I town read LLD I have to give Greeting the boot.

So, I took the time to analyse two players who were under suspicion at the moment and tried to understand the arguments against them and that's bad?

Half of the votes this game have either been not explained at all, or were given three lines of text at most. At least that's my impression. Sorry for wanting to make a more informed choice as to whom I'm voting out.

I also think that

Lady Lambdadelta

is town but I don't see a shred of an explanation why her being town makes me scum.

Hmmm, do you come from a site meta where wall posts are the common practice?

In post 1301, Andante wrote: idk who this is:

Greeting

In post 1377, Val89 wrote:

In post 1372, Roden wrote:Interesting that I have to ISO both of us, and in under two minutes I can find the answer you're looking for while proving your answer doesn't exist.

In post 1361, Val89 wrote:I've already explained that it isn't. I'm not going to explain yet again to you or anyone else.

It took me

one

minute.

In post 1375, Greeting wrote:

In post 1259, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm a little weirded out all i got was a "I don't fucking know," same with cephrir but maybe i can see that but i'm not sure how i'm floating in anyone's null space atm i can barely keep my damn mouth shut

i think my ultimate bears opinion is they could be scum but maybe not who i want to go after d1. noraa's list is a little problematic for me if fae's had no controversial takes maybe noraa's has too many i guess? maybe? i dunno somehow there's like 7 scum and they turn it into 3 and that's impressive

They don't look very coordinated as a hydra. I think if

The Three Bears

were scum, their behaviour would be much closer to one another than it is.

In post 1382, Roden wrote:

In post 1377, Val89 wrote:

In post 1372, Roden wrote:Interesting that I have to ISO both of us, and in under two minutes I can find the answer you're looking for while proving your answer doesn't exist.

In post 1361, Val89 wrote:I've already explained that it isn't. I'm not going to explain yet again to you or anyone else.

It took me

one

minute.

To do what? You still haven't answered my question.

In post 1383, Val89 wrote:

In post 1375, Greeting wrote:

In post 1259, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm a little weirded out all i got was a "I don't fucking know," same with cephrir but maybe i can see that but i'm not sure how i'm floating in anyone's null space atm i can barely keep my damn mouth shut

i think my ultimate bears opinion is they could be scum but maybe not who i want to go after d1. noraa's list is a little problematic for me if fae's had no controversial takes maybe noraa's has too many i guess? maybe? i dunno somehow there's like 7 scum and they turn it into 3 and that's impressive

They don't look very coordinated as a hydra. I think if

The Three Bears

were scum, their behaviour would be much closer to one another than it is.

In post 1382, Roden wrote:

In post 1377, Val89 wrote:

In post 1372, Roden wrote:Interesting that I have to ISO both of us, and in under two minutes I can find the answer you're looking for while proving your answer doesn't exist.

In post 1361, Val89 wrote:I've already explained that it isn't. I'm not going to explain yet again to you or anyone else.

It took me

one

minute.

To do what? You still haven't answered my question.

I have. I'm not going explain again because I have.

In post 1384, Val89 wrote:At that's the last time we will have that discussion.
Call it scummy. Go on. I dare you.

In post 1362, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 1259, Save The Dragons wrote:i dunno somehow there's like 7 scum

been sitting on this one but screw it...

Anyone else think 7 scum is a weird thing to point out? Like unless I've missed a trick I can't find where the scum numbers are said anywhere and that seems really weighted

-Pinkie, NARF!

In post 1386, Roden wrote:and you said no.

In post 1373, Val89 wrote:

In post 1369, The Three Bears wrote:Val you had any luck interpreting any hydras yet?

-Kiepin

Something feels off with you bears, but I'm struggling to articulate what exactly it is, and I'm wondering if I simply struggling to get a handle on how to deal with a hyrda in general rather than evidence of scumminess on your part.

The fact that, for instance, I'm struggling to figure out which of the heads 'Kiepin' relates to, despite the earlier explanation, isn't helping matters.

In post 1388, Val89 wrote:

In post 1386, Roden wrote:and you said no.

That's such a misrep. Show me where I said no, Roden.

I said I had, and I wasn't going to into yet

again.

In post 1383, Val89 wrote:

In post 1375, Greeting wrote:

In post 1259, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm a little weirded out all i got was a "I don't fucking know," same with cephrir but maybe i can see that but i'm not sure how i'm floating in anyone's null space atm i can barely keep my damn mouth shut

i think my ultimate bears opinion is they could be scum but maybe not who i want to go after d1. noraa's list is a little problematic for me if fae's had no controversial takes maybe noraa's has too many i guess? maybe? i dunno somehow there's like 7 scum and they turn it into 3 and that's impressive

They don't look very coordinated as a hydra. I think if

The Three Bears

were scum, their behaviour would be much closer to one another than it is.

In post 1382, Roden wrote:

In post 1377, Val89 wrote:

In post 1372, Roden wrote:Interesting that I have to ISO both of us, and in under two minutes I can find the answer you're looking for while proving your answer doesn't exist.

In post 1361, Val89 wrote:I've already explained that it isn't. I'm not going to explain yet again to you or anyone else.

It took me

one

minute.

To do what? You still haven't answered my question.

I have. I'm not going explain again because I have.

In post 1357, mastina wrote:

In post 1252, Save The Dragons wrote:i think i slipped up too with noraa pronouns, i'm sorry

^

In post 1213, The Three Bears wrote:uhhh what is happening on this page?? If I'm reading this right and Mush is bullying the best faerie bear, HOW DARE YOU.

Mush v Flea is to me I'm not sure if it's hilarious or depressing as it's two plural people fighting each other when I'm pretty damn sure both are town now.

In post 1278, Grendel wrote:I think these early read lists of yours arent things you normally would elaborate on, but I'd really appreciate follow-up on Noree, and a range of confidence in that tr.

I have like a 66% ability to soulread Norwee.

As in, 2/3rds of the time, I can soulread Norwee--and even in the one third where I can't soulread Norwee, I can't get a read on Norwee.

So when I say Norwee is town here, without a doubt? It's the soulread in effect.

Why can I soulread Norwee? Fucked if I know, I legit have no clue why Norwee's the one player onsite that I have the soulread ability of in 2021-2022. But I can, and this is Norwee as town.

With very very high confidence.

I'll do my best to explain it when it's not 4 am and I have work the next day.

In post 1387, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1362, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 1259, Save The Dragons wrote:i dunno somehow there's like 7 scum

been sitting on this one but screw it...

Anyone else think 7 scum is a weird thing to point out? Like unless I've missed a trick I can't find where the scum numbers are said anywhere and that seems really weighted

-Pinkie, NARF!

my point is that noraa said there was a lot of scum

do you really think i slipped knowing how many scum there are and that there are 7 in this game? 1/3 of the player list is scum?

In post 1359, Roden wrote:I did explain it. I've explained it several times now. I'm not going to do it again.

In post 1386, Roden wrote:This is just a scum claim then