Mafiascum.net

Wait that's not a question at all

Meow.

Also am I ever gonna get an answer to why I'm near-conf town because you kiiiiinda seem to be completely ignoring that.

In post 1354, Elsa Jay wrote:Eh. This seems more fun anyway.

VOTE: Gibus

Also we're gonna need better from you than "vote Gibus and watch BBT and Crescent grill him".

"More fun" is not a pro-town reason for voting. Especially when two players are already voting each other.

I did say earlier I wanted to do something stupid. this seems suitable enough.

And frankly I don't think Vivax or Corwin is good anymore, Toffee is being useful, NotMaf feels like a cop out, and the rest are townie enough.

Gibus is my main choice besides Gera.

In post 1372, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Again, missing the point.

My problem is not whether your vote was random or not.

My problem is that from your vote (random or not) Crescent town read you. Scum!Gibus thinks 'Cool, an early town read, I'll take that' and town!Gibus thinks 'Why the hell did Crescent just town read me for a random vote?' You did the former.

The is explained in 47. I felt no need to "question" anything more. Nor would any other towny be compelled to.
The read is a logical consequence of a non random vote. If the vote is in fact random, the town read doesn't exist anymore.
I made it clear that vote was random, thereby nullifying said townread.

That should clear things up, no? Or am I being slow witted.

Not only did you do the former. You had a problem with somebody else throwing out an early town read that you felt was in 'bad faith'. Is this not exactly what Crescent did?

Not at all. There was no good follow up to elsa's read, unlike cres.

In post 1376, Crescent wrote:Also am I ever gonna get an answer to why I'm near-conf town because you kiiiiinda seem to be completely ignoring that.

You have a lot of game-solving posts that I think are hard to fake as scum.
Clidd(town) had a good townread on you which is a +

Ok, sorry thisnisngojng to be brief. Weekend and so time.is short and tomorrow is fathers day.

I quickly looked to see if anyone asked me any questions, and I didn't. If I missed something thrn say.

I liked toffee's progression as they read the game, at the start saying people were townie and then just going more and more "this person stinks" and catching up to where the rest of us are.

In post 1379, Elsa Jay wrote:And frankly I don't think Vivax or Corwin is good anymore, Toffee is being useful, NotMaf feels like a cop out, and the rest are townie enough.

Gibus is my main choice besides Gera.

Yep this is what was needed. NM is only ever a vote today if we just collectively have no idea who the hell to vote. Hopefully he just gets vigged tonight.

The problem is if he doesn't get vigged tonight, we basically have to decide when to policy him because he cannot be allowed to survive until endgame. He's either scum or he's just going to hand scum the game with his contentless posts.

In post 1357, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:

In post 1356, gibus wrote: I never townread gera fyi.

Aww man, I was hoping you'd say that...

In post 425, gibus wrote: No idea. GB I guess?
I don't want to sound like

I'm white knighting ger

, but his vote based on the 2 posts feels rushed and panicky.
It'd make sense for him to divert all that attention asap as scum. Just a feeling though.

because you can only white-knight someone you town read. Or was that a scum slip?

How long did you have this up your sleeve?

In post 1336, Crescent wrote:Oooh wait now I remember, it was Gera.

And Vivax quickly countervoted.

Yeah, it was me. And vivax just went off on me for it, even though I was like thr 4th person voting for them or something. Somehow my vote was the one they tried to get a counter wagon on but it didn't go anywhere so they quickly lost interest

In post 1340, Not_Mafia wrote:Vivax is still scum

I am assuming you must have something tucked up your sleeve to be like this. Because you are just being impossible.
This does fill me with some hope though

In post 1354, Elsa Jay wrote:Eh. This seems more fun anyway.

VOTE: Gibus

I have no idea what this is.

A 4th vote that comes out of nowhere has natural scum equity, though doesn't warrant a countervote on it's own. The biggest issue I had with Vivax's vote jumping is he was constructing a team that made absolutely no sense and refused to even try to make any sense of it.

In post 1356, gibus wrote:

In post 1348, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I wouldn't mind hearing how Gibus came to 180 on his Gera read, too. I just noticed he is voting him.

I never townread gera fyi.

I cannot remember why though, wasnit all from my random.vote at thr start of thr game that people went after me for?

In post 1386, geraintm wrote:

In post 1340, Not_Mafia wrote:Vivax is still scum

I am assuming you must have something tucked up your sleeve to be like this. Because you are just being impossible.
This does fill me with some hope though

Well, at least he got prodded this time.

It's a start~

In post 1388, Crescent wrote:A 4th vote that comes out of nowhere has natural scum equity, though doesn't warrant a countervote on it's own. The biggest issue I had with Vivax's vote jumping is he was constructing a team that made absolutely no sense and refused to even try to make any sense of it.

My vote did not come from nowhere, if you think that go back and look at my posts. Fromm post 45 onwards I am looking at vivax heavily before voting them

In post 1162, Vivax wrote:I'd cut crescent some slack, but I had my hand forced and had to find someone not Corwin or not_mafia. Pun intended. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Also I misread this post originally based on the first line.

This post is horrifyingly bad regardless of alignment wow.

"I was forced to actually be active and contribute to the game, so I'm voting the person who forced me to do it out of spite."

In post 1391, geraintm wrote:

In post 1388, Crescent wrote:A 4th vote that comes out of nowhere has natural scum equity, though doesn't warrant a countervote on it's own. The biggest issue I had with Vivax's vote jumping is he was constructing a team that made absolutely no sense and refused to even try to make any sense of it.

My vote did not come from nowhere, if you think that go back and look at my posts. Fromm post 45 onwards I am looking at vivax heavily before voting them

Oh yeah he's the guy you called "performative" like two seconds in the the game

I will note that you barely even mention the guy again until #980. I wouldn't really say there's an established pattern until that sequence of posts leading up to the vote.

Though my memory partially me - I remembered your vote coming on him quicker than it did.

...My memory partially failed me and my typing sure partially failed me there.

Gera, what's your read on Gibus?

To speak my current peace:

I still think Vivax and Corwin are TvT, but I concede that if there's scum there it's Vivax.

I would be okay with a NotMaf Elim but it's not a priority.

I want more from Alex and Toffee or they'll go back into the scum pile.

My elims today besides NotMaf would be possibly Vixax (though the one I'd probably fight about), Gibus, or Gera. The other 5 I don't wanna launch today at all.

So basically if I have to vote today my vote will be on (maybe) Vivax, NotMaf, Gera, and Gibus wagons.

I read gibus cluelesness in 885 & 886 as townie. Overall it's not an easy read as he asks a lot and writes little, I just don't think the tone and his entrance are likely to be come from mafia.