Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 11:15 pm
varsoon,
thoughts on gcbc?
thoughts on gcbc?
essentially, don't let it reach lylo. a little flexibility here depending on what happens between now and then (if this game even goes near lylo) and how strong my read on him isamaranth wrote:What does treating it like a PGO claim mean?
i don't like this post at all. it feels like it's just setting up lynchesthe cok wrote:We think its highly unlikely that there is both a 1-shot bomb and a 1-shot redirector. Both are powerful volatile roles. Including both makes the setup far too swingy.
Evaluating their play and not the claims, I've found both to be pretty independently scummy. But why would someone actually claim a bomb like that? They wouldn't. So we think thats the lie between the 2
You guys were also 2 of my strongest scum reads as I was reading through. Something I said earlier if you care to look back. If it was -only- the claims I doubt I'd have been so sure. Someone willingly claiming bomb at l-6 and sticking with it is a pretty good tiebreaker though. Me saying that I think its likely that exactly 1 of you is scum isn't setting up future lynches, its limiting them.In post 1407, Varsoon wrote:I noticed that post as well (about there being no chance of a 1-shot bomb and 1-shot redirect) and I think it relies on too much flimsy logic.
Ugggggggghhhhhhhhh. Kill me.In post 1410, pieguyn wrote:@Kaze:I'm well aware I suck at meta. if you wanna help me out and either give me some towngames where you ask the kinds of questions I was bringing up this whole game or explain the motivation behind the questions you were asking, plz do
In post 1412, UFO wrote:Hi there.
Can I sub out because I'm really busy in this new school? I have no time. Sorry. :[
Mebbe.In post 1360, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:Can we lynch Kise slot after?
Definitely bubba and not pie.In post 1372, Kazekirimaru wrote:If we could continue on with either a bubba or pie lynch that'd be fantastic.
so you saw you couldn't dodge my points any further and thus have to face me directly?
In post 267, Kazekirimaru wrote:Kagami! Come out and play! You're active elsewhere, and I'm pretty sure you're not the type to activelurk as town. Am I finally seeing scum!Kagami?
In post 413, Kazekirimaru wrote:You really haven't noted anything interesting yet? I find that difficult to believe. Have you not had a single read or "oh, that's odd!" twinge in all these pages?
In post 519, Kazekirimaru wrote:So, why not ask some probing questions instead of just watching the pages pass by?
In post 519, Kazekirimaru wrote:Why did you join this game if you're not willing to commit for a while?
In post 519, Kazekirimaru wrote:What an odd thing to say. Isn't it a bit early to start getting defensive?
In post 655, Kazekirimaru wrote:Can you quote a completed town game where you've made an assessment in this fashion? Thank you.
In post 917, Kazekirimaru wrote:Have you been reading the game or have you just been using it to yell at Jiffy?
just to be clear let me explain my point again since looking back I didn't fully explain itIn post 1330, Kazekirimaru wrote:I see this comment made a lot more from scum than town, by the way.
which fits with the "follow the IC" idea Varsoon put out there. kaze + GCBC team anyone?In post 655, Kazekirimaru wrote:The case on Cabd? fucking balls. I can't tell how many of you are just foolishly following the sewage Jaqen is spewing out and how many are scum taking the opportunity to build up on the wagon, but you're all definitely ridiculous and/or scum. I think a lot of the people on the wagon in question are actually both! Notice how quickly it moved?
I love how this has absolutely nothing to do with anything whatsoever. how does this have anything to do with my case on you? why does the fact that my vote isn't on you or that I prefer to lynch GCBC today make my case any less valid? this is a blatant deflectionIn post 1415, Kazekirimaru wrote:Why are you putting so much effort into making a case on someone who isn't even your preferred lynch/the recipient of your vote?