Page 57 of 85

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:51 pm
by Athenas Fury
PFR can you explain your thought process irt the hammer you laid out of NacDes yesterday? When I was catching up it seemed like you would be the last person to vote in that lynch, yet you hammered without allowing them to claim. In twilight you even say that you voted to spite Mollie, to prove a point. What point were you trying to prove, that you could vote for a person you thought was town?

And on a side note, can we please leave all the personal attack out of the game? I know that this player list plays a lot together, and we get to know each other on another level. The ad hom attacks, and flat out personal attacks have gone off the charts since I have started playing. This has become less a game where cases are built upon evidence and interactions and more about meta and personal shit. I know that most of you guys are high level players on this site, and one thing that high level players are able to do is keep people guessing about their activity. If each of us played to our meta each and every game then I doubt any of us would be considered high level players, because we would be read correctly each and every time. I'm off this soap box.

P-edit- I'm caught up.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:54 pm
by Athenas Fury
In post 1393, Si and Am wrote:
In post 1391, Generically Purple wrote:BTW

Athena is OBV town, and if Mala was actually town, who thought I was scum she would refute my case and she wouldn't have deviated away from me, yesterday
She is not obv town. Your logic is wrong. Mollie was tunneling as hell and I have seen her ping scum-Nacho before and I let myself believe she had scum-Nacho. I switched because a) you weren't getting lynched. b) my vote was doing nothing. c) I was sheeping Mollie.

There was at least one scum on that wagon which means:

PfR or Anthea.

Possibly SQ, but not really seeing that as of now~

You are also scummy as hell. Like really, really scummy. You need rope.

~Si.
If you really think that there is scum on the wagon why do you not have Stuffed Crust, Squirrel Girl, or Paranoia Fueled Rampage under your microscope? What clears them of being potential scum?

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:57 pm
by Athenas Fury
I see now you do see a possibility with SG, but what about the other two?

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:27 pm
by Rancid Broderick Drake
In post 1400, Athenas Fury wrote:PFR can you explain your thought process irt the hammer you laid out of NacDes yesterday? When I was catching up it seemed like you would be the last person to vote in that lynch, yet you hammered without allowing them to claim. In twilight you even say that you voted to spite Mollie, to prove a point. What point were you trying to prove, that you could vote for a person you thought was town?

And on a side note, can we please leave all the personal attack out of the game? I know that this player list plays a lot together, and we get to know each other on another level. The ad hom attacks, and flat out personal attacks have gone off the charts since I have started playing. This has become less a game where cases are built upon evidence and interactions and more about meta and personal shit. I know that most of you guys are high level players on this site, and one thing that high level players are able to do is keep people guessing about their activity. If each of us played to our meta each and every game then I doubt any of us would be considered high level players, because we would be read correctly each and every time. I'm off this soap box.

P-edit- I'm caught up.
Yaar, wench, ye case bee drowned and ye town 'pression be weak. One can nae fake such a visceral reaction as they be.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:29 pm
by Rancid Broderick Drake
In post 1399, Athenas Fury wrote:
In post 1393, Si and Am wrote: There was at least one scum on that wagon which means:

PfR or Anthea.

I would like for you to tell me how I would, as scum, go after Nacho the way I did.
Ye prayed on the squib'd inability to see beyon' her spyglass and changed the winds to'ard me first mate.

Ye know, as ye exactly did yesterday.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:30 pm
by Rancid Broderick Drake
In post 1391, Generically Purple wrote:BTW

Athena is OBV town, and if Mala was actually town, who thought I was scum she would refute my case and she wouldn't have deviated away from me, yesterday
I nae not know thee alignment, but if ye truly think the wench goddess be real, well, I have white whale to sell thee.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:49 pm
by Mhork and Mindy
In post 1394, Si and Am wrote:Also I want to talk to peng, please.
Anything in particular?
In post 1399, Athenas Fury wrote:
In post 1393, Si and Am wrote: There was at least one scum on that wagon which means:

PfR or Anthea.

I would like for you to tell me how I would, as scum, go after Nacho the way I did.
My impression was that Nacho went after Tammy first, which makes it less of an active choice on your part.

--PA

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:15 pm
by Athenas Fury
In post 1399, Athenas Fury wrote:
In post 1393, Si and Am wrote: There was at least one scum on that wagon which means:

PfR or Anthea.

I would like for you to tell me how I would, as scum, go after Nacho the way I did.
My impression was that Nacho went after Tammy first, which makes it less of an active choice on your part.

--PA[/quote]


Yeah, and if you think I would have done anything but crumble under a nacho attack on me as scum you're insane.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:17 pm
by Athenas Fury
In post 1404, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:
In post 1399, Athenas Fury wrote:
In post 1393, Si and Am wrote: There was at least one scum on that wagon which means:

PfR or Anthea.

I would like for you to tell me how I would, as scum, go after Nacho the way I did.
Ye prayed on the squib'd inability to see beyon' her spyglass and changed the winds to'ard me first mate.

Ye know, as ye exactly did yesterday.
I have no idea what this says.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:18 pm
by Athenas Fury
In post 1403, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:
In post 1400, Athenas Fury wrote:PFR can you explain your thought process irt the hammer you laid out of NacDes yesterday? When I was catching up it seemed like you would be the last person to vote in that lynch, yet you hammered without allowing them to claim. In twilight you even say that you voted to spite Mollie, to prove a point. What point were you trying to prove, that you could vote for a person you thought was town?

And on a side note, can we please leave all the personal attack out of the game? I know that this player list plays a lot together, and we get to know each other on another level. The ad hom attacks, and flat out personal attacks have gone off the charts since I have started playing. This has become less a game where cases are built upon evidence and interactions and more about meta and personal shit. I know that most of you guys are high level players on this site, and one thing that high level players are able to do is keep people guessing about their activity. If each of us played to our meta each and every game then I doubt any of us would be considered high level players, because we would be read correctly each and every time. I'm off this soap box.

P-edit- I'm caught up.
Yaar, wench, ye case bee drowned and ye town 'pression be weak. One can nae fake such a visceral reaction as they be.

You obviously don't know how to read former fish or tell the two of us apart mate.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:25 pm
by Athenas Fury
I'm bummed trolls are gone, I want to yell at that for weird meta on me. I've only been in 3p lylo twice and I wasn't confirmed because lol putting in effort. I'd really really love to know what game he was peddling.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:39 pm
by Rancid Broderick Drake
SG wrote:How come?
It was me other head that posted that, but I'll answer since we both be on the same wave length, here (HA, WAVE LENGTH, SEE WHAT I DID THAR? I BE A FUNNY PIRATE).

Neither me or me other half bought her reaction to being "hammered" yesterday (she was definitely not invested in the game enough to break down and cry in public about being lynched after putting almost zero energy into the game). Neither of us liked any of the reactions to the game that followed, either. Neither of us like the tone of her posts - she be very stiff, on edge, guarded. And I didn't like the way she was (or, rather, wasn't really) scum hunting yesterday - she latched onto the nacho thing (for terrible reasons, really - but hey, terrible reasoning seems to be the norm in this game... which reminds me, I want to thank mollie for getting herself modkilled and giving town a chance to win this game. You have my gratitude. It was, by far, the best thing you did in this game).

I'm also not liking her posts so far today, either. They're very mechanical. Formerfish's #1400 also pinged on a testing-the-waters-but-not-committing-to-anything level.
tammy wrote:I would like for you to tell me how I would, as scum, go after Nacho the way I did.
@SG, if you want an example of what I mean by "mechanical", this sort of thing looks like a prepared response for when someone mentions her involvement in the nacho lynch. Plus, really, in the case the she is scum against nacho-town, she'd pretty much be forced to change things up a bit. And this isn't even a big deal omg-cannot-see-that-possibly-coming-from-scum-Tammy! thing, it's something very basic she could change about her scum game.

So this looks mechanical and it's a silly request.
tammy wrote:If you really think that there is scum on the wagon why do you not have Stuffed Crust, Squirrel Girl, or Paranoia Fueled Rampage under your microscope? What clears them of being potential scum?
@SG, another example of a mechanical and somewhat silly line of questioning. It doesn't take a ship architect to figure out the answer here (hint: it has to do with their reads) so this question just seems like a question for the sake of asking a question. Or perhaps as a way of deflecting attention. Either way, poor line of questioning.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:40 pm
by Rancid Broderick Drake
In post 1388, Mhork and Mindy wrote:Paranoia Filled Rampage, can you explain the Generically Purple scum read more? Like, I looked over their ISO over the Night and, while it was mostly just filler fluff, I didn't see a lot of outright scummy stuff
What be your thoughts on the game?

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:50 am
by Paranoia Fueled Rampage
In post 1400, Athenas Fury wrote:PFR can you explain your thought process irt the hammer you laid out of NacDes yesterday?
I asked for a claim and then got bored so I hammered :shifty:
Then things got ugly with regard to our back and forward with Mollie.
~G

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 2:03 am
by Stuffed Crust
What the fuck is wrong with people that they can't shut up about ongoing games?

Vote: PFR


Dat hammer was a scumclaim, bro.

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 4:55 am
by Squirrel Girl
I like both the PFR and Athena wagons.

I guess I'll wait for one to get to L-1 and then call that person town and quickhammer.

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:47 am
by Rancid Broderick Drake
First pirate to point out SC be obv-scum gets town points.

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:16 am
by Majiffy
UHHHHHH

...Bah?

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:24 am
by Generically Purple
In post 1385, Paranoia Fueled Rampage wrote:I think the scumteam is Squirrel, Athena's, and Generically purple.

Im a little upset because I actually put effort into reading Clubhouse over the night and had them as town.

My hydra is more in favor of Athena today because we ALL agree on this read, but I made a bigass case on Generic in the hydra QT and I personally think they are the most likely scum.

VOTE: Athena

Oh please do share your case on me specifically. Because day 1 consisted of me popping in and fucking about while mara (bless her) carried our hydra with opinions, scumhunting and standing up to the game bullies who clearly know fuck all.

So your read of only me will be a joy to read.

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:43 am
by Squirrel Girl
In post 1416, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:First pirate to point out SC be obv-scum gets town points.
I still think he looks town.

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:52 am
by Paranoia Fueled Rampage
With the 2modkillings we'll prob be in mylo tomorrow if we mislynch again today. Mass claim today?
~G

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:09 am
by Athenas Fury
In post 1420, Paranoia Fueled Rampage wrote:With the 2modkillings we'll prob be in mylo tomorrow if we mislynch again today. Mass claim today?
~G

You're joking right?

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:12 am
by Paranoia Fueled Rampage
No I'm 100% genuine
~G

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:19 am
by Athenas Fury
In post 1411, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:
Neither me or me other half bought her reaction to being "hammered" yesterday (she was definitely not invested in the game enough to break down and cry in public about being lynched after putting almost zero energy into the game). Neither of us liked any of the reactions to the game that followed, either. Neither of us like the tone of her posts - she be very stiff, on edge, guarded. And I didn't like the way she was (or, rather, wasn't really) scum hunting yesterday - she latched onto the nacho thing (for terrible reasons, really - but hey, terrible reasoning seems to be the norm in this game... which reminds me, I want to thank mollie for getting herself modkilled and giving town a chance to win this game. You have my gratitude. It was, by far, the best thing you did in this game).
Yeah you don't know very much about me if you don't know that my mood heavily influences my game. Me not being invested has nothing to do with being frustrated and completely shocked about how that went down. Kim not guarded at all, either by the way.
rbd wrote:
tammy wrote:I would like for you to tell me how I would, as scum, go after Nacho the way I did.
@SG, if you want an example of what I mean by "mechanical", this sort of thing looks like a prepared response for when someone mentions her involvement in the nacho lynch. Plus, really, in the case the she is scum against nacho-town, she'd pretty much be forced to change things up a bit. And this isn't even a big deal omg-cannot-see-that-possibly-coming-from-scum-Tammy! thing, it's something very basic she could change about her scum game.

So this looks mechanical and it's a silly request.
Well that's just stupid. People don't prepare responses and especially when they can't know they'll be accused of that. I don't have a good read on Siam, and I want to know their thought process.

Do I sound mechanical? I'm trying really hard to right now.
rbd wrote:
tammy wrote:If you really think that there is scum on the wagon why do you not have Stuffed Crust, Squirrel Girl, or Paranoia Fueled Rampage under your microscope? What clears them of being potential scum?
@SG, another example of a mechanical and somewhat silly line of questioning. It doesn't take a ship architect to figure out the answer here (hint: it has to do with their reads) so this question just seems like a question for the sake of asking a question. Or perhaps as a way of deflecting attention. Either way, poor line of questioning.
That wasn't me, so if you're going to use pencil meta, you should probably get us right.

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:19 am
by Athenas Fury
In post 1422, Paranoia Fueled Rampage wrote:No I'm 100% genuine
~G
We are not mass claiming, not a chance.