- So, the two scum-reads you were pushing late D2 are now null reads?
Can you explain please?
i have already told you this before:
I JUST GO BY WHAT FEELS RIGHT MOST OF MY FUCKIGN SHIT GOES BUT GUTS AND WHAT I THINK THERE IS LIKE NO LOGICAL PROCESS BEHIND MY RATIONELS
im going to eat before i get pissed off again
I feel like my play style resembles this, sort of. I get the whole playing by gut mentality, but at some point you need to be able to give us a reason for thinking the way you do. Even if we don't understand it we can try to see why you think something is what it is. Not even giving us a general explanation at any point in time comes off as scum afraid to commit to a read.
Still waiting on Titus, but my vote may very easily land on Ika.
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:59 am
by Majiffy
Flames has requested replacement.
What the fuck are you people doing to scare off all our damn players?
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:07 am
by Formerfish
We are figuring out they are scum in ways they never imagined being found out for.
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:14 am
by ika
can you just vote me so i can self hammer to rid myself and move on with my life?
i think titus is going to be replaced, she has been awol for a while
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:14 am
by Majiffy
Doctor Who replaces Flames who replaces Spruce who replaced GrayFoxxxx.
and before you ask, no your not getting reasons. i wil repaeat this again if i must, i am a player that makes little to no sense, if you are going to apporach me with that kinda of meathod then you will just be even more frustrated then ever before
i give shit about logic and people making sense i go by what i think is right. about 99% of the time most of my stuff is on the fly not giving shit stuff
So your play is basically "X is scum don't ask for reasons" until it becomes "X is town don't ask for reasons"?
Like, in all your games?
I'm not keen on an ika vote, I just don't quite understand why you would play this way (and I suspect you don't, at least not the extreme you appear to be implying?). Even people with minimalist playstyles provide reasoning at some point in time, even if it's just "look at these posts and they look town/scum."
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:17 am
by Doctor Who
lol, that was quick.
thanks Majiffy.
Anything really important I should know about before I start reading?
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:20 am
by Green Crayons
↑Doctor Who wrote:Anything really important I should know about before I start reading?
Double Trouble is Titus and ??? (Titus eventually replaced the slot).
Perfect Chaos is Sonic and formerfish (formerfish eventually replaced the slot).
If my memory serves me correctly.
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:22 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
GC, you're all caught up?
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:22 am
by Doctor Who
↑BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Can the hydra put their names at the end of their post so we know who posted it please.
and before you ask, no your not getting reasons. i wil repaeat this again if i must, i am a player that makes little to no sense, if you are going to apporach me with that kinda of meathod then you will just be even more frustrated then ever before
i give shit about logic and people making sense i go by what i think is right. about 99% of the time most of my stuff is on the fly not giving shit stuff
So your play is basically "X is scum don't ask for reasons" until it becomes "X is town don't ask for reasons"?
Like, in all your games?
I'm not keen on an ika vote, I just don't quite understand why you would play this way (and I suspect you don't, at least not the extreme you appear to be implying?). Even people with minimalist playstyles provide reasoning at some point in time, even if it's just "look at these posts and they look town/scum."
a good chunck of the time. want to see my last game where i basicly did the same thing?
when i get run of for something stupid and shitty (oh nose i made a contridcition i must be scum) i have no indication to do jack b/c it often ends up being "lol nope" and get blaitently ignored.
lets look at the votes on me:
BBT: voting me for a contridiciton (stupid reasons)
shos: opertunistic voting
fish: i "scumsliped" when i went dealer,VT
you: im being anti-town and not giving shit about peoples opinions
so yes this lynch is shit, but i dont care and i fully endorse it
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:28 am
by Green Crayons
I'm not voting you, and thanks for just making stuff up about what I think about you.
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:29 am
by ika
↑Green Crayons wrote:I'm not voting you, and thanks for just making stuff up about what I think about you.
your welcome, i am merly stating what i see FMPOV.
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:31 am
by Green Crayons
Okay.
↑ika wrote:your not going to get more then that untill i take action tonight
I don't care that you later claimed VT. I'm just curious why you wrote this. Or is that also too much to ask?
↑ika wrote:your not going to get more then that untill i take action tonight
I don't care that you later claimed VT. I'm just curious why you wrote this. Or is that also too much to ask?
reactions. that is like the basis of almost every play i do. its also why i like never give reasons for anything
and if you are going to go the route of "reaction testing is stupid" or crap like that i will be done talking to you. i dont care how bad/weak/shit/whatever people think of it.
its what i do and what i live off of
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:35 am
by Doctor Who
Spoiler: So, the player I'd found most scummy so far is
"me" unfortunately. Doing all kinds of "analysis" during the RVS, and then being too chicken to vote.
↑GrayFoxxxx wrote:I'm not sure about the Prolapsed wagon. I cant see scum being so ballsy but why would a town post so oddly like that? He is kind of lurking and if he seems anymore scummy than he already has I will vote for him. I don't really have any strong reads so I'm going to do alot of ISOs and post reads TONIGHT.
↑GrayFoxxxx wrote:Guys I have plenty of energy for this. I am willing to do another round of these after more content is available, so dont worry.
↑GrayFoxxxx wrote:Not comfortable voting yet. Especially looking at Shos, and Prolapse to respond, as they are my top 2 scum.
Spoiler: So, the player I'd found most scummy so far is
"me" unfortunately. Doing all kinds of "analysis" during the RVS, and then being too chicken to vote.
↑GrayFoxxxx wrote:I'm not sure about the Prolapsed wagon. I cant see scum being so ballsy but why would a town post so oddly like that? He is kind of lurking and if he seems anymore scummy than he already has I will vote for him. I don't really have any strong reads so I'm going to do alot of ISOs and post reads TONIGHT.
↑GrayFoxxxx wrote:Guys I have plenty of energy for this. I am willing to do another round of these after more content is available, so dont worry.
↑GrayFoxxxx wrote:Not comfortable voting yet. Especially looking at Shos, and Prolapse to respond, as they are my top 2 scum.