Mafiascum.net

I'll read eventually.


Why are pignash and Espeonage not voting?

Pignash is an inactive slot for the most part. Espeonage just unvoted in the last two or three pages.

↑ Titus wrote:I quoted a few posts here that are symbolic of the bulk of AJ's posts. His focus has been more on attacking townblocks than catching scum. He's not pushing his own reads but focusing on defending himself.

So this is basically the summary of titus' entire current belief right now with me.

I've had a strong belief that Frozen_Angel, someone Titus thinks is town, has been scum. In general, their posting is fluff but some of the things FA said earlier in the thread pertaining to the Dwlee/Pistachio argument was really bad. She called it a TvS and never specified which part was scum, but was willing to go lynch to find out. That, on top of the fact that there's very little if any analysis or questioning or real advancement to the gamestate from that slot has me believing FA is scum.

So Titus is mad about that and the fact that I have dave wagon as bad, and have contested that the pistachio lynch is probably going to hang town (a fact that Dwlee is realizing now due to the questionable composition of the wagon). It isn't like I've solely devoted my time to going after FA (in fact, I've spent little time doing so) but Titus tunnels the fuck out of whatever she thinks is scummy.

@nero, my last three games I was spot on for my scum reads.

You might try listening to me for a change.

The try to wagon Titus box has even been checked to.

@Nero, I can provide links, or you can vote.

there's that lovely arrogance from Titus

Nero, stating I was right recently and can prove it isn't arrogance when you ask if I am ever right.

ok great, but you being right in previous games =//= right about AJ this game. Once I read if I agree with the AJ case I'll join, if I don't then I won't join. You've played with me a ton why do you think I'd ever blindly sheep?

Cuz deadline and nothing else is happening and you get to gloat at me if I am wrong.

I have like 20 hours, why are you in such a hurry?

↑ Nero Cain wrote:I have like 20 hours, why are you in such a hurry?

Because I live in the real world not in the Titus sucks world so I am only going to vote town.

Is there a reason you try to make everything about you?

↑ Nero Cain wrote:Is there a reason you try to make everything about you?

No. Is there a reason you always have to be contrary to me?

I mean we've had this same conversation before about each of us not trusting our reads, and for me its still the same thing, why should I trust your reads if you won't trust mine?

↑ Titus wrote:No. Is there a reason you always have to be contrary to me?

I don't think I am. I replaced in and you tried to strong arm a AJ lynch. I said no and then you got all pissy and said I was being mean to you.

So why not try to sell me on the merits of the AJ case?

↑ Nero Cain wrote:also major argument with Titus in

3...


2...

1...

I can tell the future.

The 7 for 7 though, titus.

???

↑ Titus wrote:@nero, my

last three games I was spot on for my scum reads

.

You might try listening to me for a change.

The try to wagon Titus box has even been checked to.

^

Hey, I have an idea. Let's use the extension to read the game instead of having a dumb argument.

Have to revise. History Mafia II I was not. But last 3 of 4.

@Grib, If I thought Nero looked at evidence, I would engage him on that level.

↑ Titus wrote:If I thought Nero looked at evidence, I would engage him on that level.

really? I don't oppose you 'cause you are wrong 3/4th of the time but 'cause your "cases" are filled with more wholes than Swiss cheese. Why do you feel the need to take pot shots at me?

or holes rather

↑ Nero Cain wrote:

↑ Titus wrote:If I thought Nero looked at evidence, I would engage him on that level.

really? I don't oppose you 'cause you are wrong 3/4th of the time but 'cause your "cases" are filled with more wholes than Swiss cheese. Why do you feel the need to take pot shots at me?

And that is why I don't bother engaging you. I literally just posted evidence to the contrary but rather than considering my reads could be right and sound, you post falsehoods like this.

My reads have been right 3/4th of the time.

says the person that just said I don't look at evidence.