Mafiascum.net

I think this might be the most fake scumread I have ever seen in the game of mafia.

I didn't think CDB was town until nom repped in. My read on Nom is weak and entirely meta based, and that's why I said Nom agreeing with me like that concerns me.

Aww...i wanted it

In post 1388, nomnomnom wrote:I was in your three possible pairings. Sorting me should be a priority for town!pikachu especially now that the slot was replaced with someone a bit more talkative. Yet that didn't happen at all. Why?

This post just happened when nom joined the game yesterday and cdb wasn't even in my top three

You're going to need to explain this meta read on nom. Does nom make scumreads that read fake af?

I can't atm.

I'd also rather Performer come back and do something.

Performer/nomnomnom looks great to me

Every single point Performer makes in his iso irt CDB is hedging, and he's constantly emphasizing he wants the replacement

Replacement gets here and Performer says nothing despite saying that's basically one of the things he was waiting on (although, it is the weekend, and nomnom has literally only been here for like a day)

And then nomnomnom pushes me with the word salad on the last page

Like, if I was town!nomnom, and I had a slot that had been basically saying "boy I really want to interact with that replacement" for almost the entire game, maybe I would... interact with that slot

but nomnomnom literally has not said Performer's name *until* it was presented in the context of my solve

and Performer, while he hasn't said almost anything since she replaced in, certainly hasn't even said nomnom's name to date or replied to any of her posts as far as I can tell

Actually we can go either way here, I think this is 2/2. If I'm right and it is nomnomnom/Performer, then nomnomnom is trying to find a way to push my wagon since Performer had actually become tied

Vs. nomnomnom wking Performer? But that feels less likely; she's basically been avoiding any mention of him until literally right now and exclusively focusing on her chenni tunnel to avoid committing to reads on anyone else

Some wise people told me not to do pre-flip associatives and all that stuff so.....
But let's see VOTE: Performer

In post 1405, Detective Pikachu wrote:Like, if I was town!nomnom, and I had a slot that had been basically saying "boy I really want to interact with that replacement" for almost the entire game, maybe I would... interact with that slot

Except you are not me.

You also can't accuse me of avoiding mentioning a slot when I've done the same with practically every slot in the game. That's selective argumentation.

Performer having a wagon literally happened because you did the same to him as you did to me, which is why I have no faith in a Perf wagon right now.
I'm going to take a guess and saw that schadd wouldn't take off so you needed to jump on something else.

In post 1396, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1376, Vorkuta wrote:

In post 1375, PenguinPower wrote:I don't believe there are any other good choices that are going to get lynched before EOD

We're being stonewalled/corralled and I don't even think it's by scum tbh

You do realize that you are contributing to the gamestate I just complained about...right?

Okay, but when I tried moving my vote around to lend support to Nomnom to help him do his thing, you didn't much like that either.

MJL what's your read on nomnom? You had CDB as null right?

The very fact that your entire game so far has been pushing people that had some sort of scumread on you, instantly trying to discredit them, then try to push them out of the game should be alarming to anyone paying remotely any attention to this game. You missed my points entirely and instantly decided it was a "fake" thought and an opportunistic push.

You are literally trying to pit people against me because of a concern I had in your slot.

In post 1409, nomnomnom wrote:You also can't accuse me of avoiding mentioning a slot when I've done the same with practically every slot in the game.

In post 1412, Detective Pikachu wrote:MJL what's your read on nomnom? You had CDB as null right?

I don't even remember CDB.

Meh. I really don't know.

keyword: one slot in particular

Perhaps town realizes what you are doing when it's the third time you try to use the tactic on someone this game. Just perhaps.

In post 1410, nomnomnom wrote:which is why I have no faith in a Perf wagon right now

right but you *selected* one wagon over another with no read on Performer, without even saying his name this game by the time you decided to vote me. You saw two equal wagons, Penguin presented me as a compromise lynch between the two, and then found an incredibly fake reason to l-2 me

What's more, 1410 makes me think that this is even more fake:

In post 1378, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 1365, GuyInFreezer wrote:Redemption:
Psyche:
Performer: Detective Pikachu, chennisden, MaryJoLisa
Not_Mafia:

Detective Pikachu: Not_Mafia, Redemption, schadd_

nomnomnom:
chennisden: nomnomnom, PenguinPower
LuckyOtter:
MaryJoLisa: LuckyOtter
Vorkuta:
Lil Uzi Vert:
PenguinPower:
schadd_: Vorkuta

Not Voting: Psyche, Lil Uzi Vert, Performer

This is the most awkward wagon out there.

In post 1379, nomnomnom wrote:Fuck I meant to highlight performer's wagon. I'm stupid lmao

In 1378 and 1379, you mean to imply that you don't like the Performer wagon. But you had just been saying:

In post 1371, nomnomnom wrote:Are you willing to get an UB claim out of this game?

which implies you were not strongly scumreading me, and indeed, 1380 and 1381 perform your apparent thought process:

In post 1380, nomnomnom wrote:Actually... Now that I think about it, one thing strikes me as strange when re-reading DP's iso really fast.

There's something that doesn't add up, and something should have happened, but it didn't.

In post 1381, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 1005, Detective Pikachu wrote:I don't think schadd and redemption are scum together, but schadd/performer/NM seems fine, schadd/performer/MJL seems fine, schadd/performer/CDB seems fine.

Pikachu hasn't interacted with my slot, while he should be sorting it since he believes I could be in one of the pairings.

That's scum indicative.

Now do I want to risk making this poor sod flip town UB? That's the question.

So you began by shading the Performer wagon, *before* you scumread me, but now in 1410 you're saying that you doubt the Performer wagon *because* of me, but then, why are you doubting the Performer wagon in 1378? That's the first time you even mention his name. You're reconstructing the narrative out of order to fit your new fake thought process lol

Vorkuta's slot worries me, I have to say.

In post 1415, MaryJoLisa wrote:

In post 1412, Detective Pikachu wrote:MJL what's your read on nomnom? You had CDB as null right?

I don't even remember CDB.

Meh. I really don't know.

You had CDB listed as null and you've been online. Do you think that nomnomnom therefore should be scumreading you since you haven't really been asking her questions or engaging her during the weekend?

@dp the amount of misrepping in that wall should be criminal

In post 1407, Vorkuta wrote:Some wise people told me not to do pre-flip associatives and all that stuff so.....
But let's see VOTE: Performer

Easty what's your read of nomnom rn?

The game is going to go nowhere if all you do is spam pages and pages and pages of "HEY SLOT X, WHAT'S YOUR READ ON NOMNOM (THEY ARE SCUM BY THE WAY)" then just continually individually flood every one of them with a reason not to trust me. That's just stupid.

Everyone knows you think you are scum, what you're doing is creating absolute garbage content.

You think I am scum*